It was the middle of a high-stakes interview in late 2023, and the air in the room basically turned to ice. Andrew Ross Sorkin, the seasoned New York Times journalist, was digging into the reality of a massive advertiser exodus on X, the platform we all still mostly call Twitter. Elon Musk sat there, wearing a dog tag and looking remarkably unbothered for a man losing billions in brand deals. Then, he said it.
"If somebody's going to try to blackmail me with advertising, blackmail me with money, go fuck yourself."
He didn't just say it once. He repeated it for emphasis. "Go. Fuck. Yourself. Is that clear?" He even called out Bob Iger, the CEO of Disney, who was actually in the building that day. It was a moment of pure, unadulterated chaos that instantly became a part of internet history. But beneath the shock value, that "Elon Musk go fuck yourself" outburst was a turning point for how we think about the intersection of free speech, corporate power, and the survival of social media.
The Context Behind the Outburst
To understand why Musk snapped, you have to look at the weeks leading up to that November afternoon. X was in a freefall. Major brands like Apple, Disney, IBM, and Warner Bros. Discovery had already hit the pause button on their ad spend. Why? Because Musk had endorsed a post that many viewed as antisemitic, and watchdog groups like Media Matters were publishing reports showing ads appearing next to pro-Nazi content.
Musk did apologize for the specific post during the interview, calling it the "dumbest" thing he'd ever done on the platform. But the apology was short-lived. He shifted almost instantly from contrition to defiance. In his mind, the advertiser boycott wasn't a business decision based on "brand safety"—it was an attempt to control his speech.
👉 See also: Share Market Today Closed: Why the Benchmarks Slipped and What You Should Do Now
Honestly, it was a clash of two completely different worlds. On one side, you had the corporate "C-suite" mentality where you protect the brand at all costs. On the other, you had Musk’s "absolutist" vision where money shouldn't be able to dictate what a person can or cannot say.
Why It Wasn't Just "A Bad Day"
People often think this was just Musk losing his temper. It wasn't. It was a calculated, if risky, philosophical stance. Musk has long harbored a dislike for the traditional advertising model. Back in 2019, he famously tweeted, "I hate advertising." Tesla, until very recently, never even had an ad budget.
When he bought Twitter for $44 billion, he inherited a company that got 90% of its revenue from the very thing he despised. By telling advertisers to go fuck themselves, he was essentially trying to sever the umbilical cord. He wanted to prove that X could survive on subscriptions and "free speech" even if the big blue-chip companies walked away.
The Economic Aftermath: Did X Actually Die?
In the immediate wake of the comment, the predictions were dire. Analysts at the time suggested X could lose up to $75 million in revenue by the end of 2023 alone. Fast forward through 2024 and into 2025, and the numbers tell a fascinating, albeit messy, story.
✨ Don't miss: Where Did Dow Close Today: Why the Market is Stalling Near 50,000
- Valuation Drop: Fidelity, which helped fund the acquisition, has repeatedly marked down the value of X. By late 2024, estimates suggested the platform was worth less than 25% of what Musk paid for it.
- The Revenue Pivot: To make up for the lost billions, X leaned hard into its "Premium" subscriptions and attempted to court smaller, "performance-based" advertisers—the kind of brands you see on late-night TV or in the "weird" parts of Instagram.
- The Return of the Giants: Interestingly, by 2025 and 2026, we've seen some brands trickle back. Not because they suddenly love Musk’s rhetoric, but because the reach of the platform remains undeniable for certain demographics.
The "Elon Musk go fuck yourself" era also birthed a new legal strategy. Instead of just begging brands to come back, X started suing them. The company filed antitrust lawsuits against the World Federation of Advertisers and groups like GARM (Global Alliance for Responsible Media), accusing them of illegally conspiring to boycott the platform. It was a "sue them back to the table" approach that we’ve rarely seen in the history of media.
What Most People Get Wrong About the Incident
There’s a common misconception that Musk was trying to "bankrupt" the company on purpose. If you watch the full DealBook interview, he actually acknowledges the risk. He said that if the company fails because of the boycott, "the whole world will know the advertisers killed the company."
He was setting up a narrative. If X went under, he wouldn't be the villain who mismanaged a tech giant; he’d be the martyr who died for the First Amendment. It was a masterful, if expensive, bit of brand positioning.
The "Hey Bob" Factor
Singling out Bob Iger was particularly personal. Disney is the gold standard of "safe" corporate culture. By targeting Iger, Musk was drawing a line in the sand between the "woke" corporate establishment and his vision of a raw, unfiltered Town Square. It resonated deeply with his core fanbase, even as it terrified his CFO.
🔗 Read more: Reading a Crude Oil Barrel Price Chart Without Losing Your Mind
The Long-Term Lessons for Business Leaders
What can we actually learn from this, other than "don't swear during a live televised interview"?
First, the power of the advertiser has shifted. For decades, brands held all the cards. If they left, a network or a magazine died. Musk proved that a platform with a dedicated enough user base and a billionaire's bankroll can at least survive the initial blast.
Second, "Brand Safety" is a moving target. What was considered a toxic environment in 2023 started to look like "unfiltered engagement" by 2025 for some marketers. The industry is still debating whether it's better to be on a platform that everyone hates but everyone uses, or to stay "safe" and lose out on cultural relevance.
Moving Forward: Actionable Insights
If you're a business owner or a creator watching this saga unfold, don't just focus on the profanity. Focus on the underlying shift in the digital economy.
- Diversify your revenue: If your business relies on a single source of income—like X relied on big ads—you are vulnerable to "blackmail," as Musk put it. Always have a subscription or direct-to-consumer backup.
- Understand your audience's "Tolerance for Chaos": Musk’s fans loved the outburst. The general public was confused. Know who you are talking to before you go "scorched earth."
- Watch the legal precedents: The lawsuits filed by X against advertisers are currently reshaping how "boycotts" are defined in the digital age. This could change how brands interact with platforms forever.
The "Elon Musk go fuck yourself" moment wasn't just a meme. It was the sound of the old media world and the new tech world slamming into each other at 100 miles per hour. Whether X ultimately thrives or becomes a $44 billion cautionary tale, that one sentence changed the rules of the game for good.
To get a full picture of the fallout, you should look into the specific 2025 revenue reports for X, which show a surprising 10% hike in certain quarters, proving that the platform is far from a ghost town. You can also track the ongoing antitrust litigation in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, which will likely decide the future of organized advertising boycotts.