You probably saw the videos. Big, oversized cardboard checks, cheering crowds, and Elon Musk on stage looking like he was hosting a high-stakes version of The Price is Right. It started in late 2024 as a daily lottery for swing-state voters who signed a petition for his America PAC. Then, fast forward to early 2025, and he was at it again in Wisconsin. Honestly, the whole Elon Musk 1 million dollar giveaway became one of the weirdest legal puzzles in modern political history.
People were confused. Was it a lottery? A bribe? Or just a very expensive marketing campaign?
The reality is way more "legal loophole" than "random luck." While Musk’s social media posts used the word "randomly" and told people they had a "daily chance" to win, his lawyers eventually had to sing a different tune when the courts got involved. If you thought you had a statistical shot based on nothing but a signature, you might want to sit down for this one.
The Truth About Those Random Winners
When Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner sued to shut the giveaway down in November 2024, he called it a "grift." He argued it was an illegal lottery. But during the hearing, Musk’s team dropped a bombshell.
They admitted the winners weren't chosen by chance.
👉 See also: Can a Felon Vote in Georgia: What Most People Get Wrong
Wait, what?
Yeah. According to Chris Gober, a lawyer for America PAC, the "winners" were actually hand-picked. They were selected to be paid "spokespeople" for the PAC. They weren't picked out of a hat; they were vetted. The team looked for people with personal stories that aligned with their political messaging. They even had to sign contracts. Essentially, the $1 million wasn't a prize—it was a salary for a very short, very lucrative job as a face for the campaign.
This was a massive pivot. On X (formerly Twitter), the messaging made it sound like a sweepstakes. In the courtroom, it was a "fee-for-service" arrangement. It’s a subtle distinction that kept Musk out of hot water with Pennsylvania Judge Angelo Foglietta, who allowed the giveaway to continue through Election Day.
The 2025 Wisconsin "Cheesehead" Encore
If you thought he’d stop after the presidential election, you don’t know Elon. In March 2025, Musk brought the same tactic to Green Bay, Wisconsin. This time, it was for a high-stakes State Supreme Court race.
📖 Related: What Really Happened With Trump Withdraws From WHO: The 2026 Reality
He literally wore a yellow cheesehead hat on stage.
He handed out $1 million checks to voters like Nicholas Jacobs and Ekaterina Diesler. Again, the legal drama followed. Wisconsin’s Attorney General, Josh Kaul, tried to block it, arguing that state law prohibits offering anything of value to induce someone to vote. But once again, the Wisconsin Supreme Court refused to step in at the last second.
Musk’s legal team argued the payments were meant to spark a "grassroots movement" against activist judges, not to buy votes. It’s the same playbook: call it a giveaway to the public, call it a contract to the judge.
Is the Elon Musk 1 Million Dollar Giveaway Actually Legal?
The short answer: It depends on which lawyer you ask and which day of the week it is.
Under federal law (52 U.S.C. § 10307(c)), it is a crime to pay or offer to pay someone to register to vote. This is where things got hairy. The America PAC petition was only open to registered voters in specific states. Critics, and even some folks at the Department of Justice who sent a warning letter in October 2024, argued that making registration a prerequisite for a $1 million "chance" was basically paying for registration.
Musk’s side-step was clever. They argued they weren't paying people to register; they were paying registered people to sign a petition.
- The Petition: It was about supporting the First and Second Amendments.
- The Referral Fee: They also offered $47 (and later $100) just for referring other voters to sign.
- The Defense: Since you didn't have to vote for a specific person—or vote at all—to get the money, they claimed it wasn't "vote-buying."
Most legal experts are still split. Some see it as a brilliant exploitation of vague campaign finance laws. Others see it as a dangerous precedent that turns elections into an auction.
What Most People Get Wrong
A lot of people think the government eventually stopped him. They didn't. In both the 2024 general election and the 2025 Wisconsin judicial race, the giveaways finished exactly when Musk intended them to.
Another misconception? That anyone who signed had an equal shot. As we learned in the Philly courtroom, if your social media profile didn't "fit the vibe" or your story wasn't compelling enough to be a spokesperson, your chance was effectively zero.
It was political casting, not a Powerball drawing.
Practical Takeaways from the Chaos
If we see this happen again in the 2026 midterms—and honestly, why wouldn't we?—here is what you need to keep in mind:
💡 You might also like: Is Trump Closing National Parks? What Most People Get Wrong
- Read the Fine Print: In these "giveaways," you are often signing away your data. DA Larry Krasner pointed out that America PAC now has a massive database of over a million names, addresses, and phone numbers with "almost unlimited use" for future political targeting.
- Understand the Contract: If you ever find yourself on a stage with a billionaire and a giant check, you aren't just a winner; you're an employee. You’ll likely be signing a non-disclosure agreement (NDA) and a spokesperson contract.
- Watch the Courts: These cases are rarely settled quickly. The 2024 lawsuits in Pennsylvania and the 2025 challenges in Wisconsin show that judges are often hesitant to interfere with "political speech" right before an election, even when the tactics are controversial.
The Elon Musk 1 million dollar giveaway changed the rules of the game. It proved that if you have enough capital and a creative enough legal team, you can push the boundaries of election law further than anyone thought possible. Whether that’s a win for the First Amendment or a loss for election integrity is something voters are still debating.
One thing is for sure: the era of the "Billionaire Sweepstakes" is probably just getting started. If you're following these stories, keep a close eye on the Federal Election Commission (FEC) filings for America PAC to see where the money actually went and who else might be trying the same stunt next cycle.