Honestly, the conversation around eliminating the Department of Education is usually a mess of shouting matches and slogans. People treat it like a light switch. Flip it off, and suddenly schools vanish; keep it on, and everything is fine. Neither is true. Education in America is a weird, fragmented beast where the federal government actually does very little of the teaching but holds a massive, controversial checkbook.
You’ve probably heard politicians on the campaign trail promise to shutter the doors at 400 Maryland Avenue. It sounds simple. It isn't. To understand what happens if we actually get rid of it, you have to look at what the agency actually does all day, which mostly involves moving money around and enforcing civil rights laws that were written decades ago.
Why the Department of Education exists (and why people want it gone)
The U.S. Department of Education is a baby compared to things like the Treasury or State Department. Jimmy Carter created it in 1979 as a thank-you to teachers' unions. Before that, education was just a small part of the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
Critics like Representative Thomas Massie or former Secretary Betsy DeVos argue that the federal government has no constitutional authority to be in the classroom. They're basically right about the Constitution—education isn't mentioned there. Because of the 10th Amendment, power is supposed to stay with the states. But over forty years, the agency has grown into a $200 billion-plus behemoth.
Most of that money isn't for "teaching." It’s for loans.
If you wiped the agency out tomorrow, the biggest shock wouldn't be in your local 3rd-grade classroom. It would be in the financial aid office of every college in the country. The Department manages a $1.6 trillion student loan portfolio. That is a staggering amount of debt. You can't just delete a trillion dollars with an executive order without the entire banking system having a collective heart attack.
The civil rights factor
Then there’s the legal side. The Office for Civil Rights (OCR) is tucked inside the department. This is the group that investigates when a school isn't following Title IX or when kids with disabilities aren't getting the help they need under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA).
Some folks think this is "federal overreach." Others think it's the only thing keeping local school boards from ignoring marginalized kids. If you're eliminating the Department of Education, you have to decide where those investigators go. Do they move to the Justice Department? Do they just stop existing? That’s where the policy gets really thorny and where most "abolish the department" plans start to get vague.
💡 You might also like: Air Pollution Index Delhi: What Most People Get Wrong
Following the money to your local school
Here is a reality check: the federal government only provides about 8% to 10% of the funding for K-12 schools. The rest comes from your property taxes and state coffers.
If the department vanished, your local high school wouldn't lose 90% of its budget. It would lose about a dime for every dollar. But—and this is a big "but"—that federal dime is usually earmarked for the poorest students (Title I) and special education.
Rich suburban schools would barely feel a breeze.
Poor rural or inner-city schools? They’d be hit with a sledgehammer.
What about the "Red Tape"?
The argument for getting rid of the agency often centers on "local control." Teachers spend hours filling out federal forms to prove they spent "Title I" money exactly how Washington wants. It’s a lot of paperwork. Boring, soul-crushing paperwork.
Many governors argue that if the federal government just gave the money directly to the states as a "block grant" with no strings attached, they could use it more efficiently. No more "Common Core" style pressure. No more federal mandates on testing. Just "here’s your money, teach the kids."
The Student Loan Elephant in the Room
We have to talk about the FAFSA. If you've ever applied for college, you know the nightmare of the Free Application for Federal Student Aid. The Department of Education runs that.
If the department is eliminated, the entire infrastructure for Pell Grants and Stafford Loans has to go somewhere. There are basically three options:
📖 Related: Why Trump's West Point Speech Still Matters Years Later
- Move it to the Treasury: This makes the most sense if you view loans as just a financial transaction.
- Privatize it: Hand the loans back to big banks like it was before 2010. This usually means higher interest rates for students.
- End it: This is the "nuclear option." If the federal government stops guaranteeing loans, college tuition would likely crash because nobody could afford the current prices, but the transition would be absolute chaos for anyone currently in school.
Common Misconceptions about Federal Education Power
People think the Secretary of Education is a national school principal. They aren't. They can't legally dictate a national curriculum. The "General Education Provisions Act" actually forbids the federal government from exercising any direction or control over the curriculum or personnel of any educational institution.
Now, they find ways around this. They use "incentives."
Remember "Race to the Top" under the Obama administration? It wasn't a law that forced states to change. It was a contest. "Change your standards, and we might give you a billion dollars." States are usually so desperate for cash that they play along. This "soft power" is what many people actually want to eliminate when they talk about eliminating the Department of Education.
The 10th Amendment Argument
Constitutional originalists, like those at the Heritage Foundation or the Cato Institute, argue that the very existence of the department is a "soft" violation of state sovereignty. They believe that even if the federal government is just "helping," that help comes with a price tag of autonomy.
If a state wants to focus entirely on vocational training and skip standardized testing, the Department of Education makes that very difficult. Without the department, we would likely see 50 very different education experiments happening at once. Some states would probably thrive. Others might see their education systems crumble without federal oversight.
What actually happens next?
If a move to dismantle the agency actually gained steam in 2026 or beyond, it wouldn't happen overnight. It’s a legislative mountain. You’d need an act of Congress to repeal the Department of Education Organization Act of 1979.
Most realistic proposals involve "devolution." This is a fancy policy word for "giving it back."
👉 See also: Johnny Somali AI Deepfake: What Really Happened in South Korea
- Step One: Transfer the loan portfolio to the Treasury.
- Step Two: Convert K-12 funding into block grants for states.
- Step Three: Move the Office for Civil Rights to the Department of Justice.
- Step Four: Turn the remaining data-gathering wings (like the National Center for Education Statistics) into an independent agency.
Actionable Insights for the Future
Whether you're a parent, a student, or just an interested voter, the debate over eliminating the Department of Education affects your wallet and your community's future.
Watch state legislation. Since the federal role is technically limited, the real power has always been at the state level. If federal funding were to shift to block grants, your state governor would suddenly become the most important person in your child's education.
Evaluate the debt structure. If you are a student, keep a close eye on who manages your loans. Changes to the department often lead to changes in income-driven repayment plans or forgiveness programs.
Understand the "Strings Attached." If you're a teacher or administrator, look at how much of your daily "compliance" work stems from federal vs. state mandates. Often, "local" bureaucracy is just as thick as the federal version.
Check the Civil Rights protections. If you have a child with an IEP (Individualized Education Program), any change to the federal department's structure could change your legal recourse for services. You'd need to know your state’s specific laws on disability rights in education, as they would become your primary shield.
The department isn't just a building; it's a massive web of contracts, laws, and debts. Cutting it out is more like surgery than demolition. It requires a scalpel, not a wrecking ball, or the patient—the American student—might not survive the procedure.