If you’ve been scrolling through your feed lately, you probably noticed the political temperature is already spiking. It’s only mid-January 2026, and yet the "election results so far" aren’t just about 2024 or 2025 anymore. We’re staring down the barrel of a midterm cycle that looks absolutely nothing like the textbooks predicted.
Basically, the "red tide" everyone expected for 2026? It’s hitting a massive blue wall of recent local data.
💡 You might also like: Florida Man Feb 4: The Wildest Headlines and Why We Can't Stop Looking
The 2025 Hangover: Why Last Year Changed Everything
Honestly, you can't talk about where we are today without looking at the 2025 "off-year" results. Those races were a bloodbath for the GOP. Democrats didn't just win; they swept.
In Virginia, Abigail Spanberger didn't just "win" the governor's mansion; she crushed it with a 14.6% margin. That’s double what Kamala Harris did in the state back in 2024. Then you’ve got Mikie Sherrill in New Jersey, who took the governorship by a solid 13 points. These weren't fluke wins. They were a systematic reclamation of suburban voters who seem to be prioritizing stability over chaos.
New York's Shock Wave: The Mamdani Era
Perhaps the most "wait, what?" moment for anyone tracking election results so far was the New York City mayoral race. Zohran Mamdani, a democratic socialist, beat out a moderate heavyweight like Andrew Cuomo. Think about that. A city that usually leans toward "pragmatic" moderates chose a guy who quoted Eugene Debs in his victory speech.
Mamdani’s win tells us a lot about the 2026 vibe. Young voters—those under 45—voted for him by a 44-point margin. That’s a generational shift, not just a policy preference. If you're a candidate in 2026 and you aren't talking about housing and immigrant rights, you're basically invisible to half the electorate.
The Congressional Exodus of 2026
Right now, as we sit in January, the biggest "results" aren't votes—they're retirements. The House is in a state of absolute attrition.
Just this month, we’ve seen high-profile exits:
- Julia Brownley (D-CA) called it quits on Jan 8.
- Steny Hoyer (D-MD), a literal fixture of the House, announced his retirement on Jan 7.
- Neal Dunn (R-FL) joined the list on Jan 13.
Why does this matter? Because open seats are much harder to defend. When an incumbent leaves, the "incumbency advantage" evaporates. Republicans are currently holding a razor-thin majority in the 119th Congress (218 to 213), and with 21 members already choosing to walk away rather than fight for re-election, that majority is on life support.
Global Context: It's Not Just Us
If you look past our borders, the 2026 election results so far are showing a global "anti-incumbent" streak.
In Uganda, the presidency was decided just yesterday (Jan 15), and the results are still rippling through East Africa. Germany is heading into a new era with Friedrich Merz, and even Canada’s political landscape is being reshaped by—wait for it—U.S. trade rhetoric.
Portugal is up next on Jan 18. Keep an eye on that one. If the right-wing trend there continues, it might signal a different wind than what we’re seeing in the U.S. suburbs.
What People Get Wrong About the 2026 Map
Most people think 2026 is just about "the party in power loses." That’s the historical rule. But historical rules have been getting punched in the face lately.
🔗 Read more: The MSNBC Rachel Maddow Podcast Everyone Is Finally Talking About
Look at California’s Proposition 50. It passed late last year, allowing the state to redistrict now rather than waiting. That single move could flip five seats from Red to Blue before a single 2026 ballot is even printed. This is "lawfare" at its most effective, and it’s why the GOP's structural advantage is melting away.
The SCOTUS Factor: Bost v. Illinois State Board of Elections
The Supreme Court just dropped a bomb on Wednesday (Jan 14). In Bost v. Illinois, Chief Justice Roberts led a 7-2 majority that gives candidates a "categorical right" to sue over election rules.
Basically, if a candidate doesn't like how mail-in ballots are being counted—even if they can't prove it will make them lose—they have "standing" to sue. Expect the 2026 election results so far to be tied up in courts for months. We are moving from an era of "counting votes" to an era of "litigating the count."
Actionable Insights for the 2026 Cycle
So, what do you actually do with this info? If you're trying to stay ahead of the curve, here’s the play:
- Watch the "Retirement Tracker": Every time a Republican in a swing district (like those in New York or California) retires, the odds of a Democratic House takeover in 2026 jump significantly.
- Focus on the "Affordability Narrative": The data shows voters don't care about "democracy" as much as they care about the price of eggs and rent. Candidates who win in 2026 will be the ones who stop talking about January 6th and start talking about grocery bills.
- Check Local Special Elections: Look at the special election results in places like Virginia and Florida. These are the true "canaries in the coal mine." If a Democrat wins a state house seat in a +5 Republican district, that’s your sign.
The "election results so far" show a country that is restless, tired of the old guard, and increasingly willing to try something radical—whether that’s a socialist mayor in NYC or a complete overhaul of redistricting in California. The 2026 midterms aren't just coming; they're already being decided by the retirements and court rulings happening this week.
✨ Don't miss: DOGE Access Social Security Data: What Most People Get Wrong
Stay tuned to local state board of election sites. Don't just wait for the big networks to tell you what's happening in November. The real movement is happening in the specialized courts and the "quiet" retirement announcements in D.C. right now.