Edward Furlong and Jacqueline Domac: The Scandal That Hollywood Tried to Ignore

Edward Furlong and Jacqueline Domac: The Scandal That Hollywood Tried to Ignore

If you grew up in the 90s, Edward Furlong was the face of cool. The bowl cut, the voice cracking, the "Eat Me" attitude—he was John Connor. But while Furlong was saving the world from Skynet on screen, his real life was spiraling into a situation that would be headline news for months if it happened today. At the center of that storm was Edward Furlong and Jacqueline Domac, a relationship that basically redefined "problematic" before the internet even had a word for it.

Honestly, looking back at the timeline, it’s wild how much of this played out in the open.

How It All Started: The Terminator 2 Connection

Most people don’t realize that Jacqueline Domac wasn't just some random person Furlong met at a party. They met on the set of Terminator 2: Judgment Day in 1990. At the time, Eddie was just 13 years old. Domac was 26. She was working as his stand-in.

Think about that for a second.

By the time Furlong was 15 or 16, they weren't just working together anymore. They were a couple. By 16, he had moved into her Los Angeles home. While other kids his age were worrying about prom or getting their driver’s licenses, Furlong was living with a woman twice his age who had transitioned from his "stand-in" to his tutor, and then to his live-in girlfriend and manager.

It wasn't exactly a secret, either. You can find dozens of archival photos of Edward Furlong and Jacqueline Domac walking red carpets together for movies like A Home of Our Own and Pecker. They looked like a normal Hollywood couple, except for the fact that one of them was legally a child and the other was nearly 30.

💡 You might also like: Dale Mercer Net Worth: Why the RHONY Star is Richer Than You Think

Furlong’s family didn't just sit back and watch. His uncle, Sean Furlong, actually filed a statutory rape complaint against Domac. He tried to have her prosecuted, but it didn't go anywhere. Eddie was reportedly estranged from his mother and under the guardianship of his aunt and uncle, but once he started making millions, the power dynamic shifted.

He basically chose Domac over his family.

The relationship lasted about six or seven years, which is a lifetime in Hollywood years. But when it ended in 1999, it didn't just fizzle out. It exploded. Domac sued Furlong for domestic violence, claiming he had been physically and verbally abusive. She also wanted a massive payday—15 percent of his earnings from the previous three years.

Her argument? She claimed she was his manager and they had a "quasi-spousal" agreement.

The lawsuit, Jacqueline L. Domac v. Edward Furlong, was eventually dismissed in late 1999, but the damage to Furlong's reputation and mental state was already deep. People close to the set of his films back then, like on the movie Brainscan, reportedly saw the friction. There were stories of Eddie punching holes in trailers and missing rehearsals because of the drama at home.

📖 Related: Jaden Newman Leaked OnlyFans: What Most People Get Wrong

The Venice High School Censorship Scandal

Here’s a weird footnote you probably haven't heard. Years after the breakup, in 2003, two high school journalists at Venice High School tried to write about Domac. Why? Because she was teaching sex education and health there.

The students, Naldy Estrada and Julio Robles, found the old court documents while researching an article. They thought it was newsworthy that their sex ed teacher had been in a well-documented relationship with a minor. The school principal killed the story, claiming it was an invasion of privacy.

It turned into a whole First Amendment battle involving the Los Angeles Times and the Student Press Law Center. Domac even threatened to sue the kids for libel. It just goes to show how long the shadow of the Edward Furlong and Jacqueline Domac era lingered, even after both had moved on to completely different lives.

Why This Still Matters for Hollywood History

We talk a lot about "nepo babies" and "child star curses" now, but the Furlong story is a specific kind of tragedy. It wasn't just drugs—though those came later—it was a total lack of boundaries.

Furlong was a kid with no stable parental figure, thrust into a world of millions of dollars, and the person hired to "tutor" him became his romantic partner. It’s a textbook case of what happens when the adults in the room fail.

👉 See also: The Fifth Wheel Kim Kardashian: What Really Happened with the Netflix Comedy

Furlong’s career cooled off significantly after the late 90s. While American History X showed he had incredible range, the personal baggage seemed to catch up. He’s been open in recent years about his struggles with addiction and his journey toward sobriety, but you can’t help but wonder how things would have been different if he’d had a more typical adolescence.

What We Can Learn From the Furlong/Domac Saga

  • Guardianship isn't foolproof: Even when family tries to intervene, the legal system and the "money machine" of Hollywood often side with whoever the star wants to be with.
  • The "Manager" Trap: It was common in the 90s for romantic partners of young stars to also act as their managers, creating a messy overlap of personal and professional interests.
  • Public Perception Changes: In 1994, people saw them on red carpets and mostly shrugged. In 2026, that relationship would likely result in immediate legal intervention and a social media firestorm.

If you’re looking into the history of child actors, it’s worth researching the Labor Laws and Coogan Accounts that are supposed to protect these kids. While those laws protect the money, they don't always protect the kid from the people who enter their inner circle.

The best thing to do if you want to understand the impact of this era is to look at the work of advocates like Paul Petersen and his organization A Minor Consideration, which works to give child actors the support Furlong clearly lacked.

To get a full picture of how the industry has changed, compare Furlong's experience with the modern strictness of on-set tutoring and the roles of "intimacy coordinators" and youth advocates used today. The shift in "industry standards" is the only thing that prevents more stories like this from becoming the norm.