He isn’t exactly a household name for most people grabbing coffee in New York or London. But for about 300 million Orthodox Christians, Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew I is the "first among equals." He sits on a throne in the Phanar, a relatively small, tucked-away district in Istanbul, Turkey. It’s a position of immense historical weight and, honestly, a fair bit of modern political drama. He’s been in office since 1991. Think about that. He has outlasted multiple Popes, dozens of Prime Ministers, and the entire rise and fall of several geopolitical eras.
He’s 85 now.
Born Dimitrios Arhondonis on the island of Imbros, he isn't just a relic of Byzantine history. Most people know him as the "Green Patriarch." Long before it was trendy for global leaders to talk about carbon footprints, Bartholomew was arguing that destroying the natural world is, quite literally, a sin. He didn't just write a pamphlet about it; he organized massive floating symposia on the Black Sea and the Danube, bringing together scientists and theologians who usually don't share the same room.
The Power (and Limits) of the Ecumenical Patriarchate
You have to understand the job description to get why he’s so controversial in certain circles. The Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople Bartholomew I doesn't command an army. He doesn't even have a sovereign state like the Vatican. He lives in a country where his official title isn't even fully recognized by the state government, which prefers to see him only as the head of the local Greek community. Yet, he holds the "Tomos"—the power to grant independence to national churches.
That power is exactly what sparked the biggest schism in Christianity since 1054.
Back in 2018, Bartholomew made a move that changed everything. He granted autocephaly (basically, religious independence) to the Orthodox Church of Ukraine. Before this, the Ukrainian church was under the thumb of the Moscow Patriarchate. To say the Russian Orthodox Church was "upset" is an understatement. They broke communion with him. It was a massive, seismic shift in the religious landscape that mirrored the literal war that followed. He saw it as a matter of justice and historical precedent; Moscow saw it as an act of war.
It's complicated.
👉 See also: Who's the Next Pope: Why Most Predictions Are Basically Guesswork
Politics and prayer shouldn't mix, right? In the world of the Ecumenical Patriarchate, they are inseparable. Bartholomew has spent decades trying to bridge the gap between the East and the West. He’s tight with Pope Francis. They actually have a very real, very public friendship that has moved the needle on Catholic-Orthodox relations more than any pair in a thousand years.
Why they call him the Green Patriarch
Let's talk about the environment. It's his thing. It’s what he’ll be remembered for.
In the 1990s, when "climate change" was still a niche scientific concern, Bartholomew was already framing environmental degradation as a moral crisis. He famously said that for humans to cause species to become extinct and to destroy the biological diversity of God's creation... these are sins. That was a radical thing for a traditional religious leader to say. He’s not just talking about recycling. He’s talking about a fundamental shift in how we see our place in the world.
He pushed the idea that the way we treat the planet is a direct reflection of how we treat each other. If you’re polluting a river upstream, you’re hurting the person downstream. It’s social justice through the lens of ecology. He’s been a staple at COP summits and has consistently pressured world leaders to move faster on carbon transitions.
The internal struggle of the Orthodox world
It hasn't all been smooth sailing. Within his own backyard, Bartholomew faces a lot of pushback. There’s a very conservative wing of Orthodoxy that thinks he’s too "ecumenical"—meaning he’s too friendly with Catholics, Protestants, and even non-Christians. They see his efforts at dialogue as a watering down of the faith.
Then there’s the Holy and Great Council of 2016 in Crete. It was supposed to be the first time in over a millennium that all the Orthodox churches met. Bartholomew spent decades planning it. At the last minute, the Russian church and a few others pulled out. It was a heartbreak. It showed just how fractured the "equals" in the Orthodox world really are.
✨ Don't miss: Recent Obituaries in Charlottesville VA: What Most People Get Wrong
Despite the snubs, he kept going. He has a certain kind of "elder statesman" energy that makes him hard to ignore. He speaks seven languages: Greek, Turkish, Latin, French, English, Italian, and German. He’s an academic at heart, with a doctorate in Canon Law from the Pontifical Oriental Institute in Rome. He knows the rules of the game better than anyone else playing it.
A day in the life at the Phanar
If you ever visit the Patriarchate in Istanbul, it’s not what you’d expect. It’s not a palace. It’s a walled-in compound with a relatively modest church (St. George’s). There’s a quietness there, even though it’s in the middle of a bustling, chaotic city. Bartholomew’s life is a mix of intense liturgical prayer—services that can last for hours—and high-level diplomacy.
One minute he’s blessing a local congregation, the next he’s on a call with a head of state about the plight of refugees in the Mediterranean. He’s been a vocal advocate for religious freedom, especially for the reopening of the Halki Seminary, which was closed by the Turkish government in 1971. That’s been a 50-year-plus battle that he still hasn't won.
The Ukrainian Schism: A Deeper Look
We need to circle back to Ukraine because it’s the defining moment of his later years. The decision to recognize the Orthodox Church of Ukraine (OCU) wasn't just about religion. It was about identity. For centuries, the religious narrative of the region was controlled by Moscow. By granting that Tomos, Bartholomew effectively said that Ukraine has its own spiritual destiny.
The fallout was immediate:
- The Russian Orthodox Church removed Bartholomew's name from their "Diptychs" (the list of leaders they pray for).
- Mount Athos, the monastic heart of Orthodoxy, became a bit of a proxy battleground between pro-Constantinople and pro-Moscow monks.
- The rift has complicated inter-faith dialogues globally, as organizations have to choose which side to invite to the table.
Bartholomew’s stance has been clear: he believes he has the historical right to grant this independence, citing canons that go back to the Council of Chalcedon in 451. His critics say he’s overstepping. It’s a classic "states' rights vs. federal power" argument, but with ancient scrolls and icons instead of a constitution.
🔗 Read more: Trump New Gun Laws: What Most People Get Wrong
What’s next for the Patriarchate?
Bartholomew isn't getting any younger. The question of succession is always whispered about in the hallways of the Phanar and the halls of the State Department. Whoever follows him will inherit a church that is more globally visible but more internally divided than it has been in centuries.
He has spent his life trying to prove that an ancient institution can be relevant in a digital, melting world. He’s navigated the fall of the Soviet Union, the rise of globalism, and the current retreat into nationalism. Through it all, he’s remained a weirdly consistent voice.
Actionable Insights for Following His Work
If you want to actually keep up with what Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople Bartholomew I is doing, don't just look at religious news. Look at environmental policy and Eastern European geopolitics. Here is how to actually engage with his legacy:
- Read the "Common Declarations": Look at the joint statements issued by Bartholomew and Pope Francis. They are surprisingly readable and focus heavily on modern ethics, migration, and poverty.
- Track the Halki Seminary status: This is the barometer for religious freedom in Turkey. If that school ever reopens, it’s a massive win for his diplomatic legacy.
- Follow the environmental symposia: The Patriarchate still sponsors high-level talks on the environment. They often bridge the gap between "hard science" and "human values" in a way secular organizations struggle to do.
- Understand the "First Without Equals" debate: If you’re interested in church history, look into the "primus sine paribus" vs. "primus inter pares" debate. It’s the core of the tension between Constantinople and Moscow.
Bartholomew’s tenure is a lesson in soft power. He has no territory, no tax base, and no police force. All he has is a title from the 4th century and a very loud, very persistent moral bullhorn. Whether he’s talking about the melting of the Arctic ice or the sovereignty of a church in Kyiv, he’s proved that you don't need a massive footprint to leave a massive mark on the world.
The story of the 270th successor to the Apostle Andrew is far from over, but the foundations he’s laid—especially on the environment—are likely to outlast the current political squabbles of the day. He’s played the long game. In a world of 24-hour news cycles, that might be his most impressive feat.