You probably remember the internet collective gasp back in 2020 when Zac Efron showed up on Netflix with a beard, a slightly more rugged physique, and a sudden obsession with sustainable water sources. It felt like a weird pivot for the High School Musical star. But honestly, the Down to Earth tv series wasn’t just a vanity project for a celebrity trying to find himself. It actually became a blueprint for how we talk about the environment without feeling like we're being lectured by a textbook.
Efron and his co-host, Darin Olien, traveled the world to find "healthy, sustainable ways to live." That sounds like a marketing tagline, but the show was messier than that. It was curious. It was sometimes scientifically questionable. Yet, it stuck.
What People Still Get Wrong About the Down to Earth TV Series
Most viewers go into the show expecting a high-production travelogue where a rich guy eats expensive vegan food. That's not really what happens. The core of the Down to Earth tv series is actually a weirdly intense look at resource management and longevity.
A lot of critics at the time—specifically writers at Insider and various science blogs—rightfully pointed out that Darin Olien pushes some "pseudoscience" vibes. He talks about "structured water" and "superfoods" with a level of certainty that makes actual biologists wince. If you’re watching this for a PhD-level masterclass in hydrology, you're going to be frustrated. You have to take the "wellness" claims with a massive grain of salt.
The real value? It’s the infrastructure.
When they go to Iceland, they aren't just looking at volcanoes. They’re looking at how a tiny island nation manages to power almost everything via geothermal energy. They’re standing inside the Resource Park in Reykjanes, showing how "waste" from a power plant becomes the heating source for the Blue Lagoon. That’s the stuff that matters. It’s practical. It’s real. It’s not just about Zac Efron’s "dad bod" phase, even though that’s what dominated Twitter for three months.
💡 You might also like: Ashley My 600 Pound Life Now: What Really Happened to the Show’s Most Memorable Ashleys
Season 1 vs. Season 2: A Shift in Tone
The first season was a whirlwind. Iceland, France, Costa Rica, Sardinia, Lima, Puerto Rico, London, and Iquitos. It was fast. It was global. Then, the world stopped, and Season 2 had to pivot.
Down to Earth with Zac Efron: Down Under focused entirely on Australia.
This change actually made the show better. Instead of hopping across oceans, the team stayed in one massive, ecologically diverse country. They looked at the devastating aftermath of the 2019-2020 bushfires. They talked to Indigenous land managers about traditional fire practices—something that Western science is finally, belatedly, starting to value.
In the Australian season, the Down to Earth tv series felt more grounded. It stopped being a "best of" list of eco-vacations and started looking at how a specific landscape survives human-led climate change. The episode on "The Great Barrier Reef" isn't just pretty fish; it's about the grueling, slow-motion work of coral restoration. It’s depressing and hopeful at the same time.
The Darin Olien Factor
Darin Olien is the "Wellness Guru" archetype. Sometimes he’s the perfect foil to Zac’s wide-eyed wonder, and other times he’s the guy telling you that tap water is basically poison.
📖 Related: Album Hopes and Fears: Why We Obsess Over Music That Doesn't Exist Yet
Olien’s house burned down in the Woolsey Fire during the filming of the first season. That moment in the show is raw. It’s one of the few times the "celebrity travel" veneer cracks completely. You see a man who has spent his life talking about nature lose everything to a natural disaster. It gives the series a layer of empathy it wouldn’t have if it were just two bros drinking expensive smoothies.
Why We Are Still Talking About It
Sustainability can be boring. Or terrifying.
Most documentaries about the environment are designed to make you feel like the world is ending in exactly five minutes. The Down to Earth tv series avoids that by focusing on the "fixers."
Take the Paris episode. They don't go to the Eiffel Tower. They go to the city’s water system. They talk about Eau de Paris and the public water fountains that provide chilled, sparkling water to citizens for free to reduce plastic bottle waste. It’s a simple solution. It’s boring infrastructure made interesting because Zac Efron is genuinely stoked about a public drinking fountain.
Notable Locations and Their Real Impact
- Sardinia, Italy: This is the "Blue Zone" episode. They look at why people live to be 100. It’s not just the wine (though the wine helps). It’s the low-protein diet, the walking, and the social structure. It’s a lesson in longevity that isn't about expensive supplements.
- Iquitos, Peru: They dive into the Amazon and explore "biopiracy." This is a heavy topic for a Netflix show. It’s about how big pharmaceutical companies take traditional medicinal plants from Indigenous communities without giving anything back.
- London, UK: They look at urban bees and "pollution-eating" walls. This was probably the most relatable episode for anyone living in a concrete jungle.
The Scientific Controversy
It would be irresponsible to talk about the Down to Earth tv series without mentioning the "woo-woo" factor.
👉 See also: The Name of This Band Is Talking Heads: Why This Live Album Still Beats the Studio Records
Several scientists, including those from the McGill Office for Science and Society, criticized the show for platforming unproven health claims. For example, the idea that "alkaline water" is a miracle cure is largely debunked; your body regulates its own pH quite well without a $5 bottle of fancy water.
Does this ruin the show? Not necessarily. But it does mean the viewer needs to be a critical consumer. The show is at its best when it talks about engineering and community. It’s at its weakest when it tries to sell a specific lifestyle or dietary "hack."
How to Actually Apply What You See
Watching Zac Efron travel isn't going to save the planet. But the series does offer some actual, actionable insights if you look past the celebrity glitter:
- Localization is key. The most successful eco-solutions in the show are always local. What works in Iceland (geothermal) won't work in the Australian outback. The lesson is to look at what your specific environment offers.
- Question your waste. After seeing the recycling centers in the show, you realize how much of our "recycling" is a lie. Reducing consumption is always better than trying to recycle your way out of a problem.
- The Power of "Blue Zones." You don't need a gym membership to be healthy. Moving naturally and staying connected to your neighbors (as seen in Sardinia) are the strongest predictors of a long life.
The Future of Down to Earth
While there hasn't been a formal Season 3 announcement for 2026 yet, the impact of the show is visible in the wave of "eco-tainment" that followed. Efron’s transition from "teen heartthrob" to "conscientious traveler" mirrored a shift in how we want our celebrities to behave. We want them to be useful.
The Down to Earth tv series succeeded because it wasn't perfect. It was a guy who knew he didn't know everything, asking questions that we often feel too embarrassed to ask.
If you're going to rewatch it or dive in for the first time, ignore the "superfood" hype. Focus on the people who are actually on the ground, planting the trees and building the water filters. That’s where the real story is.
Practical Next Steps for Fans of the Series
- Audit your water usage: The Paris and Iceland episodes show how much we take water for granted. Check for leaks and consider a high-quality filter over bottled water.
- Research your local "Blue Zone" habits: You don't have to live in Italy to eat more legumes and walk to the store. Small lifestyle shifts are the core takeaway of the Sardinia episode.
- Support Indigenous-led conservation: Following the themes of Season 2, look for organizations in your area that prioritize traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) for land management.