Donald Trump Says He Believes the US Will Acquire Greenland: What Really Happened

Donald Trump Says He Believes the US Will Acquire Greenland: What Really Happened

If you thought the "Greenland is not for sale" saga ended in 2019, you haven't been paying attention to the White House lately. It’s back. And honestly, it’s weirder and more intense than the first time around. President Donald Trump has spent the last few weeks doubling down on the idea, recently telling reporters that he basically believes it's an "absolute necessity" for national security.

He isn't just flirting with the idea of a real estate deal anymore. It’s shifted into something much more aggressive. On January 5, 2026, Trump affirmed that "we need Greenland from the standpoint of national security," and since then, the rhetoric has hit a fever pitch. We’re talking about "the easy way or the hard way" kind of talk.

Why Donald Trump says he believes the US will acquire Greenland now

So, why the sudden rush? It’s not just about more land or a fancy new 51st state. The administration is looking at a map that looks very different than it did fifty years ago. The ice is melting, the Northwest Passage is opening up, and suddenly, this massive frozen island is the most valuable piece of real estate in the Arctic.

The President has been pretty blunt about his reasoning:

👉 See also: Who's the Next Pope: Why Most Predictions Are Basically Guesswork

  • The China-Russia Factor: Trump is convinced that if the U.S. doesn't "acquire" Greenland, Russia or China will. He even mocked Greenland’s current defenses, saying they consist of "two dog sleds" while Russian and Chinese destroyers are "all over the place."
  • The Mineral Goldmine: Greenland is sitting on a ridiculous amount of rare earth minerals—think lithium, graphite, and neodymium. These are the things we need for everything from iPhones to F-35 fighter jets. Right now, China controls the lion's share of that market, and Trump wants to break that grip.
  • The Golden Dome: There's also the "Golden Dome" missile defense program. Greenland's Pituffik Space Base (formerly Thule) is the northernmost U.S. military installation. It’s the early warning system for any missiles coming over the pole.

The "Hard Way" vs. The "Easy Way"

The most startling part of this renewed push is the tone. During a White House meeting with oil executives in early January 2026, Trump said, “We are going to do something on Greenland whether they like it or not.” He followed that up by saying he’d prefer a deal, but if it doesn't happen, he's ready to do it the "hard way."

What does "the hard way" mean? People are spooked. In Greenland, the Minister for Business and Mineral Resources, Naaja Nathanielsen, said the talk is "unfathomable" and that children in Nuuk are actually afraid of an invasion. It sounds like a spy movie plot, but for the people living there, it’s a daily headline.

The Danish Response (It’s a Hard No)

Denmark’s Prime Minister, Mette Frederiksen, hasn't budged. She’s been consistent: Greenland is not for sale, and it belongs to Greenland. In a show of solidarity, the Danish parliament recently announced they would fly the Greenlandic flag, the Erfalasorput, to signal they aren't backing down under U.S. pressure.

✨ Don't miss: Recent Obituaries in Charlottesville VA: What Most People Get Wrong

But Trump is trying to squeeze them. On January 16, 2026, he suggested he might slap tariffs on countries that don’t "go along" with the acquisition. He’s basically using the U.S. economy as a lever to pry Greenland away from the Danish Kingdom.

Can the U.S. actually buy a country?

Technically, yes. We’ve done it before. We bought Louisiana from the French, Florida from the Spanish, and Alaska from the Russians. But that was a different era of international law. Today, there’s this thing called "self-determination."

Most experts agree that for the U.S. to acquire Greenland legally, three things would have to happen:

🔗 Read more: Trump New Gun Laws: What Most People Get Wrong

  1. Denmark has to agree to sell. (Currently: No.)
  2. Greenland’s parliament has to agree. (Currently: Definitely no.)
  3. The people of Greenland have to vote for it. A recent poll showed only about 6% of Greenlanders actually want to become part of the United States. Most of them would rather be independent or stay with Denmark. The Danish government gives Greenland a "block grant" of about $600 million a year to keep their economy afloat. Trump’s argument is that the U.S. could easily handle that cost, but for the locals, it’s not just about the money. It’s about identity.

What happens next?

The tension is high, but there’s a lot of "running down the clock" happening. Danish and Greenlandic leaders are hoping to hold out until the 2026 U.S. midterm elections, betting that a change in Congress might reel in the President’s ambitions.

Meanwhile, a bipartisan group of U.S. Senators—including Lisa Murkowski and Jeanne Shaheen—has introduced legislation to block any funds from being used to forcefully annex Greenland. They’re trying to tell the world that the President’s "hard way" isn't the official stance of the entire U.S. government.

Key takeaways for the coming months:

  • Watch the Tariffs: If Trump actually moves forward with "Greenland tariffs," expect a massive trade war with the EU.
  • Military Presence: Even if a sale doesn't happen, the U.S. is likely to push for more troops and better equipment at the Pituffik Space Base.
  • The Rare Earth Race: Look for the U.S. Export-Import Bank to start funding mining projects in Greenland, regardless of who "owns" the land.

The bottom line? Donald Trump says he believes the US will acquire Greenland because he views it as the ultimate strategic "win" in a world where the Arctic is the new front line. Whether he can actually close that deal is a whole other story.


Actionable Next Steps:

  • Monitor Trade News: Keep an eye on any formal Department of Commerce announcements regarding "national security tariffs" aimed at European allies.
  • Follow the Arctic Council: Watch for upcoming summits where the U.S. and Denmark will have to face each other. The tension there will tell you if a diplomatic "face-saving" deal (like increased military cooperation without a title transfer) is on the table.
  • Mineral Market Trends: If you're an investor, track companies like Critical Metals Corp that are already operating in Greenland; they are the "boots on the ground" for the resource battle.