It started as a joke. At least, that’s what most of the world thought back in 2019 when Donald Trump first floated the idea of the United States buying Greenland. People laughed. Late-night hosts had a field day with Photoshopped images of Trump Tower looming over colorful Arctic shacks. But for Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen, it wasn't funny. It was "absurd."
Now, in January 2026, the joke has curdled into a full-blown geopolitical crisis.
Fast forward to today, and we aren't just talking about real estate anymore. We are talking about rare earth minerals, melting ice caps, and a "new Cold War" that has moved from the history books directly into the freezing waters of the North Atlantic. If you thought the original spat between Donald Trump and Greenland was a weird one-off, you haven't been paying attention to the Arctic lately.
The 2019 "Absurdity" That Wouldn’t Die
To understand why things are so tense right now, you have to look back at that first collision. In August 2019, Trump essentially treated the world's largest island like a fixer-upper in Atlantic City. He canceled a state visit to Denmark after Mette Frederiksen made it clear the island wasn't for sale. Trump called her comments "nasty."
Honestly, the diplomatic fallout was staggering for two NATO allies.
But why Greenland? It’s basically 80% ice. Well, it's about what is under that ice. As the climate shifts, the "high north" is opening up. We are seeing new shipping routes that could cut travel time between Asia and Europe by 30%. More importantly, Greenland sits on some of the largest deposits of rare earth minerals outside of China.
💡 You might also like: Percentage of Women That Voted for Trump: What Really Happened
If you want to build an F-35 fighter jet or a smartphone battery, you need what Greenland has. Trump knows this. China knows this. And Mette Frederiksen knows that Denmark is caught right in the middle.
2026: The Rhetoric Hits a Breaking Point
This month has been particularly wild. On January 12, 2026, the Greenlandic government issued a blunt statement: they will "not under any circumstances" accept US demands to become part of America. This came after Trump, back in the White House for his second term, reportedly ramped up the pressure during what diplomats described as a "horrendous" phone call with Frederiksen.
Trump isn't just asking to buy it anymore. He’s talking about national security. He’s talking about "taking action" to prevent Russia or China from seizing the territory.
"Anything less than the Arctic island being in U.S. hands is unacceptable," Trump reportedly said just a few days ago.
He’s even threatened tariffs on any country that doesn't back the US move. It’s aggressive. It’s "America First" on steroids. While a bipartisan group of US lawmakers—including Senator Lisa Murkowski—visited Copenhagen this week to try and smooth things over, the damage is real. Murkowski was clear: 75% of Americans don't even want this. But the executive branch is moving at a different speed.
📖 Related: What Category Was Harvey? The Surprising Truth Behind the Number
Why the Arctic is the New Chessboard
The Arctic used to be a place of "high latitudes, low tensions." Not anymore.
- China's "Polar Silk Road": Beijing has been trying to fund airports and mines in Greenland for years. The US has successfully blocked most of these moves, but the pressure is constant.
- The Rare Earth Race: The Tanbreez mine in Southern Greenland is a monster. It’s estimated to hold 28.2 million metric tons of rare earth elements.
- Military Presence: The Pituffik Space Base (formerly Thule) is the northernmost US military installation. It’s the early warning system for incoming missiles. In Trump’s view, leasing a base isn't enough when you could own the ground it sits on.
Mette Frederiksen's position has remained remarkably consistent since 2019. She insists that Greenland belongs to the Kingdom of Denmark, but more importantly, it belongs to the Greenlandic people. Under the 2009 Act on Greenland Self-Government, the people of Greenland have the right to self-determination. They aren't a commodity to be traded between empires.
Is This About a Deal or a Distraction?
Critics often argue that Trump uses the Greenland issue to distract from domestic problems. Maybe. But look at the numbers. The US Export-Import Bank recently signaled interest in a $120 million loan for the Tanbreez mine. That’s a "boots on the ground" financial commitment.
The strategy seems to be: if we can't buy the land, we’ll buy the industry.
However, the local population in Nuuk is pushing back hard. 2025 saw massive protests with people carrying signs that read "No Means No" and "Yankee Go Home." There is a deep-seated fear that becoming the 51st state—or a US territory—would strip away the social safety nets and cultural identity the Greenlandic people have fought for decades to protect.
👉 See also: When Does Joe Biden's Term End: What Actually Happened
What Happens Next: The Actionable Reality
So, where does this leave us? We are at a stalemate that feels like it’s vibrating. The diplomatic "temperature-lowering" mission by US senators is a start, but it doesn't change the fact that the White House is eyeing the Arctic with predatory interest.
If you are following this, here is what to watch for in the coming months:
- The March Visit: US Special Envoy Jeff Landry is scheduled to visit Greenland in March 2026. This will be the first major test of how "open for business" the locals actually are.
- The "Arctic Sentinel" Initiative: Watch for Germany and other NATO allies to propose a joint task force. They want to secure the Arctic without handing total control to Washington.
- The Tanbreez Mine Approval: If the exploitation license for this massive project moves forward with US backing, it signals a shift from "territorial purchase" to "economic integration."
The reality is that Donald Trump and Greenland are going to be in the headlines for the foreseeable future. Mette Frederiksen has the unenviable task of defending Danish sovereignty while keeping the US as a security partner. It's a tightrope walk over very cold water.
For the rest of us, it's a reminder that geography still matters. The map is being redrawn, and the Arctic is no longer just a place for polar bears—it's the center of the world's next big power struggle.
Next Steps for Following the Greenland Crisis:
- Monitor the Arctic Council: Watch for any shifts in participation from Russia or the US, as this usually signals a breakdown in regional cooperation.
- Track Rare Earth Prices: Any movement on the Kvanefjeld or Tanbreez mining licenses will immediately impact global markets and likely trigger a fresh round of rhetoric from the White House.
- Keep an eye on Danish Elections: Public sentiment in Denmark regarding the US alliance is at a modern low; any shift in the governing coalition could change how Frederiksen handles the "Greenland Question."