The question isn't whether NVIDIA can do it. It’s whether they will. If you’re sitting there with a shiny RTX 4090 or even a modest 4060 Ti, you’ve probably heard the whispers about Blackwell and the inevitable arrival of DLSS 4. There’s this nagging anxiety in the PC gaming community that Jensen Huang might pull another "Frame Gen" move and lock the newest tech to the 50 series. Honestly, it’s a valid concern. When DLSS 3 launched with the 40 series, 3080 owners felt like they’d been left out in the rain despite having plenty of raw horsepower.
NVIDIA loves their hardware-level locks. They’ll tell you it’s about the Optical Flow Accelerator (OFA). They’ll say the previous generation just doesn't have the "math" to handle it. But the technical reality is often a bit more gray than the marketing slides suggest.
💡 You might also like: How to Upload PDFs to Kindle Without Ruining the Experience
What DLSS 4 on 40 series looks like in the Blackwell era
We have to look at what DLSS 4 is actually trying to solve. DLSS 1 was a mess of blurry edges. DLSS 2 perfected upscaling. DLSS 3 gave us Frame Generation. So, what’s left? The industry consensus, backed by recent NVIDIA research papers on neural texture compression and path tracing, suggests DLSS 4 is leaning heavily into AI-driven full-scene reconstruction. We aren't just talking about fake frames anymore; we are talking about AI actually "painting" the lighting and textures in real-time to bypass the massive performance hit of path tracing.
Can the 40 series handle that?
Probably. The Ada Lovelace architecture inside your 40 series card is actually incredibly capable. It features fourth-generation Tensor Cores and that aforementioned Optical Flow Accelerator which, let's be real, is significantly faster than what was in the 30 series. If DLSS 4 relies on improved temporal data or even a new version of Ray Reconstruction, the 40 series has the hardware "bones" to make it work. The real bottleneck isn't the silicon; it's the product segmentation strategy.
The hardware gap that isn't really a gap
Let’s get nerdy for a second. The 40 series cards use the TSMC 4N process. The upcoming 50 series (Blackwell) is moving to a more refined node, likely a custom version of TSMC's 3nm. This gives the 50 series more "area" to dedicated AI logic. However, the jump from 40 to 50 isn't as massive as the jump from the 20 series to the 30 series was in terms of raw architecture shifts.
If NVIDIA decides to keep DLSS 4 on 40 series as a feature, they’d likely have to "tier" it. Maybe the 50 series gets "Ultra Neural Reconstruction" while the 40 series gets a slightly stripped-down version. It’s happened before. Think about how DLSS 3.5 (Ray Reconstruction) actually did come to older cards. That was a huge olive branch. It proved that NVIDIA is willing to backport features when the hardware can actually handle the math without making the game feel like a slide show.
Why the "lockout" theory might be wrong this time
NVIDIA is facing a different market than they were two years ago. FSR 3 and 4 from AMD are getting better. Intel’s XeSS is surprisingly competent. If NVIDIA locks DLSS 4 to only the most expensive new cards, they risk alienating the massive 40 series install base that they just spent billions convincing to upgrade.
History is a funny teacher.
Remember when G-Sync required a proprietary module? Eventually, they opened it up because the market demanded it. If DLSS 4 is a foundational shift in how games are rendered—rather than just a "bonus" like frame gen—NVIDIA almost has to bring it to the 40 series to ensure game developers actually use it. Developers don't want to spend hundreds of hours implementing a feature that only 2% of the Steam Hardware Survey can actually toggle on.
Texture Compression and the VRAM problem
One of the biggest rumors surrounding DLSS 4 is AI Texture Compression. You know how games are taking up 150GB now? And how 8GB of VRAM is basically a death sentence for 440p gaming? If DLSS 4 can use AI to decompress textures on the fly, it would effectively make your VRAM "bigger."
This would be a godsend for the RTX 4060 and 4070. These cards are often criticized for their narrow memory buses and limited VRAM. If NVIDIA brings this specific part of DLSS 4 to the 40 series, they solve their own PR problem. They turn "under-spec'd" cards into long-term champions. It’s a brilliant move, if they have the guts to do it.
The technical hurdles of Blackwell's new Tensor Cores
We have to be honest about the limitations. Each generation of Tensor Cores adds new instructions. If DLSS 4 uses a specific FP8 or FP4 data format that is physically absent from the Ada architecture, then DLSS 4 on 40 series becomes a massive headache for engineers. They’d have to write two separate code paths.
- One for Blackwell that is hyper-efficient.
- One for Ada that "emulates" or works around the missing instructions.
Is it possible? Yes. Is it cost-effective for NVIDIA? That depends on how much they want to sell 5090s.
Look at the 30 series. It has Tensor cores. It has an OFA. But NVIDIA claimed the OFA in the 30 series was too slow for Frame Gen to feel "good." They preferred to give users nothing rather than a sub-par experience. We might see a repeat of that logic. "Oh, the 40 series can do DLSS 4, but the latency is 10ms higher, so we disabled it for your own protection." Users hate that. It feels like planned obsolescence, even if the math supports the decision.
Real-world performance expectations
If we actually get the tech, don't expect miracles.
If you're running Cyberpunk 2077 or Alan Wake 2 with full path tracing, a 4070 is already sweating. DLSS 4 isn't going to suddenly make a 40 series card twice as fast as a 50 series card. What it will do is stabilize frame times. The goal of modern AI upscaling has shifted from "more FPS" to "better pixels." We are reaching a point of diminishing returns with raw frame counts. 120 FPS vs 140 FPS doesn't matter much. But 120 FPS with zero shimmering and perfect motion blur? That’s the dream.
What about the "Modding" scene?
Let's not forget the community. Within weeks of DLSS 3 launching, modders were already trying to force it onto older cards. We eventually saw AMD’s FSR 3 frame gen modded into NVIDIA cards. If NVIDIA doesn't officially support the 40 series, the community will try to hack it in.
But there's a catch.
DLSS is closed source. Unlike FSR, you can't just peek at the code and port it over. If NVIDIA puts a hard check in the DLL file for the GPU ID, you're stuck. This puts a lot of pressure on NVIDIA to be the "good guy" this cycle.
Actionable steps for 40 series owners
Don't panic-sell your 4080 just yet. The 40 series remains an incredible piece of engineering. Here is how you should actually handle the next few months as the 50 series and DLSS 4 announcements loom:
✨ Don't miss: When Did Life Begin on Earth? The Messy Truth Behind Our Origins
- Watch the DLSS 3.5 updates: NVIDIA is still actively improving Ray Reconstruction. If your card gets better at this over the next six months, it's a good sign that the "neural" path is still open for your hardware.
- Don't ignore FSR: Even if NVIDIA locks you out, AMD’s FSR 4 is rumored to be fully AI-based and hardware-agnostic. You might end up using AMD tech on your NVIDIA card to get DLSS 4-like features.
- Monitor VRAM usage: If DLSS 4 really does focus on texture compression, pay attention to which games are hitting your VRAM ceiling. This will be the first place you'll notice the "value" of a potential upgrade.
- Ignore the hype cycles: Every "leaker" on Twitter/X wants you to think your current card is garbage so you'll click their links. The 40 series has plenty of life left, with or without a version 4.0 sticker.
The 40 series was a massive leap in efficiency. Even if NVIDIA decides to gate-keep the latest software, the raw power of the Ada architecture ensures these cards will be viable for 1440p and 4K gaming for years. The most likely scenario? We get a "DLSS 4 Lite" or a continued expansion of DLSS 3.5 features that bridge the gap. NVIDIA knows they can't leave 20 million customers behind without a fight. Keep your drivers updated, stay cynical about marketing slides, and enjoy the high-end performance you already have.
---