It happened fast. One minute Janet Jackson is doing a standard press run for her tour, and the next, she’s at the center of a massive political firestorm that had half of the internet scratching their heads. If you missed it, the legendary pop icon sat down for an interview with The Guardian in late 2024 and basically repeated a debunked conspiracy theory about Kamala Harris’s heritage. She claimed she "heard" that the Vice President wasn't actually Black and that her father was white.
Social media didn't just react; it exploded. But nobody went harder than comedian DL Hughley.
Hughley has never been one to bite his tongue. He’s built a whole career on being the guy who says the "too-honest" thing. When he saw Janet’s comments, he didn't just disagree—he went for the jugular. Honestly, it was one of those moments where you realize how deeply divided even the celebrity world is when it comes to identity politics.
The Irony That Started the Feud
DL Hughley’s response wasn't just a political correction. It was a personal, scorched-earth takedown. He took to X (formerly Twitter) and didn't hold back, calling Janet’s interview a "Trump rally" in disguise. But the part that really set the timeline on fire was when he pointed out what he called the "irony" of the situation.
Hughley's argument was basically this: How can you question someone’s racial identity when you’ve spent decades altering your own physical features?
He made some pretty sharp jabs about the Jackson family’s history with plastic surgery. He famously tweeted that it was ironic to question someone’s Blackness while "breathing through the nose of a white woman." It was harsh. It was visceral. And for many people, it felt like a low blow, even if they disagreed with Janet’s original comments.
✨ Don't miss: What Really Happened With the Brittany Snow Divorce
The Kamala Harris Connection
To understand why DL was so heated, you have to look at his own journey. Just a few weeks before this blew up, Hughley had a very public "come to Jesus" moment at the Democratic National Convention.
He actually apologized on stage.
For years, DL had been a vocal critic of Kamala Harris’s record as a prosecutor. He’d repeated many of the same talking points you hear in barbershops—that she was "a cop" or "anti-Black." But after sitting down with her and doing his own research, he admitted he was wrong. So, when Janet Jackson—someone with a massive platform—stepped out and repeated misinformation that he had just spent weeks trying to debunk, he saw it as a personal affront to the progress he was trying to make.
Why Janet’s Comments Sting So Much
Janet isn't just a singer. She’s royalty. When she speaks, people listen. By echoing the sentiment that Harris "turned Black" for political gain, she was validating a specific brand of disinformation that has been used to marginalize biracial people for a long time.
Kamala Harris is the daughter of a Jamaican father and an Indian mother. That’s a fact. But in the interview, Janet seemed genuinely confused, saying, "I was told that they discovered her father was white."
🔗 Read more: Danny DeVito Wife Height: What Most People Get Wrong
The backlash was swift because it felt like Janet was out of touch. She admitted in the same interview that she hadn't "watched the news in a few days," yet she was willing to pass on hearsay about the most powerful woman in the country. It’s that lack of due diligence that really rubbed people the wrong way.
The "Manager" Fiasco
Things got even weirder after the interview went live. A man named Mo Elmasri, claiming to be Janet’s manager, issued a formal apology to several news outlets. He said Janet’s comments were based on "misinformation" and that she had great respect for the Vice President.
Problem is? He wasn't her manager.
Janet’s actual team, led by her brother Randy Jackson, quickly clarified that Elmasri was not authorized to speak for her. They didn't actually issue a new apology, though. They just focused on firing the guy who tried to fix it. This left a sour taste in the mouths of many fans who were waiting for a "my bad" from the star herself.
The Different Viewpoints
Now, not everyone was on "Team DL." While many people thought Janet was wrong, they also thought Hughley’s response was misogynistic and unnecessarily cruel.
💡 You might also like: Mara Wilson and Ben Shapiro: The Family Feud Most People Get Wrong
- The Supporters: Some felt Hughley was right to call out the hypocrisy. They argued that if you’re going to use your platform to spread lies about race, you should expect people to look at your own history with race and identity.
- The Critics: Many fans argued that attacking a Black woman’s physical appearance—especially someone as beloved as Janet—is never the answer. They felt DL was "bullying" an icon who might just be misinformed rather than malicious.
- The Neutral Ground: A smaller group just felt sad. Sad that two giants of Black culture were trading insults over a political narrative that was designed to divide them in the first place.
Why This Still Matters in 2026
We're still talking about this because it highlights a massive problem in our current media landscape: the celebrity echo chamber. When you’re as famous as the Jacksons, you’re often surrounded by people who don't tell you "no." You might hear something on a group chat or a niche blog and assume it's true because no one is there to check you.
It also shows how protective people have become over the "biracial experience." The idea that you have to choose one side or that your identity is "fake" if you embrace both is a tired trope that many are no longer willing to tolerate.
Actionable Takeaways for Navigating Celebrity News
If you’re trying to make sense of these kinds of blowups in the future, keep these things in mind:
- Check the Source: Janet admitted she hadn't watched the news. Always look for the primary source of a claim before repeating it, especially if it sounds like a conspiracy.
- Separate the Art from the Politics: You can love Control and Rhythm Nation while still acknowledging that the person who made them might have a blind spot when it comes to 21st-century political nuances.
- Watch the "Apology" Chain: In the age of AI and independent contractors, "official statements" aren't always official. Wait for a verified post from the celebrity’s actual social media accounts before assuming a situation is resolved.
- Understand the History: DL Hughley’s anger didn't come from nowhere. It came from a man who had recently publicly repented for his own misinformation. Context is everything.
The rift between DL Hughley and Janet Jackson wasn't just a "celebrity beef." It was a collision between old-school celebrity insulation and new-school political accountability. Whether you think DL went too far or Janet didn't go far enough, it’s a masterclass in how quickly a reputation can be challenged when the cameras are always rolling and the internet never forgets.
To stay informed on how these stories evolve, it's best to follow journalists who specialize in the intersection of culture and politics rather than just gossip blogs. This ensures you're getting the full picture of why these "celebrity feuds" often carry much heavier societal weight than they appear to on the surface.