When the news first broke that Star Jones was taking over the center chair on Divorce Court, the internet basically did a double-take. People remembered her from the early, chaotic days of The View or maybe from her own short-lived show in the 90s. There was this collective "Wait, really?" across social media. But honestly, if you’ve actually sat down and watched an episode lately, you’ve realized that the 2026 version of this show is a totally different beast than it was under previous judges.
Star didn't just walk into a established TV set. She walked into a legacy. Following in the footsteps of Judge Mablean Ephriam, the legendary Lynn Toler, and Faith Jenkins isn't exactly a walk in the park. Each of those women brought a specific flavor of "tough love" to the bench. But what's weirdly fascinating about divorce court star jones is how she’s blended high-level legal precision with a sort of "Auntie energy" that we haven't quite seen before.
The Prosecutor Pedigree Nobody Talks About
Most people think of Star Jones as a "TV personality." That’s a mistake. Before she was arguing with Barbara Walters, she was a Brooklyn homicide prosecutor. We’re talking about a woman who spent six years in the trenches of the New York City District Attorney’s office.
That background matters because of how she handles the litigants. On Divorce Court, couples aren't just there to scream about who gets the flat-screen TV or who cheated with the neighbor. They’re dealing with legally binding mediations. Star approaches these cases like a trial. You’ll see her lean in, her eyes getting that sharp, prosecutor glint when she catches someone in a lie. It’s not just for the cameras; it’s a reflex.
She often says, "I'm a lawyer first," and it shows in how she parses out the evidence. She reads every single fact pattern before the litigants even walk through those doors. Unless, of course, a producer holds back a "surprise" like a DNA test result. She wants her real reaction for those—because, let’s be real, we all watch for the drama—but for the law? She’s prepared.
Why Season 27 is Hitting Differently
We are currently deep into Season 27, and the ratings suggest that the "Star-ized" version of the show is working. One of the biggest shifts has been the "Virtual Jury."
Instead of just talking to a bailiff in her chambers, Star has integrated a digital audience. She feeds off them. She asks for their opinions in real-time during livestreams. It makes the show feel less like a stuffy courtroom and more like a community intervention. It’s a smart move for 2026. Everything is interactive now, so why shouldn't justice be?
🔗 Read more: How Old Is Paul Heyman? The Real Story of Wrestling’s Greatest Mind
The "Auntie Star" Factor
There is a specific tone Star uses that her predecessors didn't quite lean into. Judge Lynn Toler was the queen of the "bridge-back" to reality, using her own life experiences to ground couples. Faith Jenkins was the elegant, poised voice of reason. Star? She’s your aunt who knows you're full of it but still wants you to win.
She calls it "Auntie Star" and "Judge Star."
- Judge Star will shut down a shouting match with a single look.
- Auntie Star will literally sigh, lean over the bench, and ask, "Baby, why are you doing this to yourself?"
This duality is why the show is still relevant. People don't just want a legal ruling anymore; they want someone to tell them why their life is a mess. Star’s personal life—her own highly publicized divorce from Al Reynolds back in the day, her health struggles, and her current happy marriage to Ricardo Lugo—gives her a level of empathy that feels earned. She’s been through the tabloid ringer. She knows what it’s like to have your private failures broadcast to the world.
Dealing with the "The View" Baggage
Let’s address the elephant in the room. Some viewers struggled to separate the divorce court star jones persona from the one they saw on The View decades ago. Back then, the narrative was often about her being "diva-ish" or secretive about her health.
But time changes people. Or at least, it should.
In her recent interviews, like her 2025 appearance on the Tamron Hall Show, Star has been remarkably open. She talks about how the pandemic shifted her priorities. She spends her "off weeks" from taping (she usually does seven to nine shows a day during tape weeks) at home in Chicago or East Hampton. She’s more settled. That "settledness" has translated to the bench. She isn't performing for the sake of a soundbite as much as she is trying to get to the root of the dysfunction.
💡 You might also like: Howie Mandel Cupcake Picture: What Really Happened With That Viral Post
The Technical Side of the Gavel
Divorce Court is unique because it’s a "nontraditional" court show. It’s arbitration. When couples sign up, they agree to let the judge’s decision be final.
Star has actually pushed the show toward more mediation. She’s mentioned that the U.S. divorce rate, hovering around 42%, isn't just a statistic to her; it's a call to action. She often tries to see if a couple really needs to split or if they just need a professional to tell them to grow up.
"One litigant is coming into court because they have not felt heard in the relationship. They will be heard here." — Star Jones
She’s not just looking at the law; she’s looking at the "common knocks" of life. It’s a mix of Houston Law Center education and Brooklyn street smarts.
Is It Scripted? (The Forever Question)
Every time a new judge takes over, this question pops up. Is divorce court star jones presiding over actors?
The short answer: No.
The nuanced answer: The cases are real, the people are real, but the presentation is for TV.
📖 Related: Austin & Ally Maddie Ziegler Episode: What Really Happened in Homework & Hidden Talents
People apply to be on the show. They have real disputes. The producers look for the most "engaging" (read: dramatic) cases because, at the end of the day, it's a syndicated television show. But the legal rulings are enforceable. If Star tells a husband he owes his wife $5,000 for the car he crashed while out with his mistress, that’s a real debt settled through the show's production budget/arbitrator agreement.
What You Can Learn from Watching
If you're actually going through a rough patch, watching Star work can be surprisingly educational. Not for the legal advice—don't get your legal advice from a 30-minute daytime show—but for the communication breakdown patterns.
- The "Hall Pass" Fallacy: Star constantly deals with couples who tried "open" relationships to save a marriage. It almost never works on the show.
- Financial Infidelity: It’s rarely just about the cheating. It’s about the secret credit cards and the hidden bank accounts.
- The "Virtual Jury" Mirror: Watching how the audience reacts to a litigant’s behavior often helps that person see how they’re coming across to the world.
Moving Forward with the Gavel
If you’re a fan of the show or just curious about how Star is holding up the mantle, the best way to catch her is through the official Divorce Court YouTube channel or local syndication. They’ve leaned heavily into "Behind the Scenes" content lately, showing Star in her chambers talking to the bailiff, which she calls one of her favorite parts of the new format.
If you’re considering your own legal path, remember that while Star makes it look snappy, real-world divorce is a marathon, not a 22-minute episode.
Your next steps for diving deeper into this:
- Check your local listings for Season 27 airtimes; many markets have moved it to the 2:00 PM or 3:00 PM slot.
- Follow the official YouTube channel to participate in the "Virtual Jury" livestreams—it’s the most direct way to see how the show is evolving.
- If you're actually looking for legal mediation, look for a certified arbitrator in your state who uses the same "no-nonsense" approach Star advocates for.
Whatever your take on Star Jones, you can't deny she's breathed new life into a show that's been on the air since the 50s. She didn't just join the cast; she took ownership of the bench.