You’ve seen the headlines. One day a major tech giant is bragging about their latest representation report, and the next, they’re quietly gutting their entire DEI department during a round of layoffs. It’s confusing. It’s messy. Honestly, it’s a bit of a circus right now.
Diversity equity and inclusion—the phrase itself has become a political lightning rod, but if we strip away the shouting matches on social media, what are we actually talking about? We’re talking about whether a business is smart enough to use all the talent available to it. That’s it. That is the core of the whole thing.
Most people think this is just a human resources checklist. It’s not.
The Massive Gap Between "Hiring" and "Belonging"
There’s this huge misconception that if you just change the percentages in your slide deck, you’ve "done" diversity. But you can hire a thousand people from different backgrounds and still have a toxic culture where nobody wants to stay. This is where the "inclusion" and "equity" parts come in, and frankly, they’re way harder than the "diversity" part.
Diversity is just the mix. Inclusion is making the mix work. Equity is ensuring the playground isn't tilted at a 45-degree angle for half the kids.
Take a look at the data from the 2023 McKinsey Women in the Workplace report. They found that for every 100 men promoted from entry-level to manager, only 87 women were promoted. For women of color, that number drops to 73. This is the "broken rung" on the career ladder. You can’t fix that with a weekend seminar or a nice poster in the breakroom. It requires looking at the actual mechanics of how people get promoted.
Who gets the "stretch" assignments? Who is being invited to the informal drinks after work where the real decisions happen? If you don’t know the answers to those questions, your diversity equity and inclusion strategy is basically just a PR campaign.
🔗 Read more: Rizzo Agency Clinton NY: What Most Local Business Owners Get Wrong
Why "Colorblind" Policies Actually Fail
I hear this a lot: "I don't see color; I just hire the best person for the job."
It sounds noble. It sounds fair. It’s also factually disconnected from how human brains work.
Social psychologists, like Dr. Jennifer Eberhardt at Stanford, have spent decades proving that implicit bias is baked into our cognition. We gravitate toward people who remind us of ourselves. If a hiring manager loves hiking and a candidate mentions they spend their weekends hiking, that candidate is already halfway to a job offer because of "culture fit."
But "culture fit" is often just a polite way of saying "this person feels familiar and safe."
When companies shift toward "culture add"—looking for what a person brings that the team doesn't already have—everything changes. They stop looking for clones. They start looking for the missing pieces of the puzzle. This isn't about lowering standards. It’s about widening the search area so you actually find the best talent instead of just the most convenient talent.
The Real-World Cost of Getting This Wrong
Look at the Boeing 737 Max crisis or the early facial recognition software that couldn't "see" people with darker skin tones. These aren't just HR failures; they are product failures. When everyone in the room has the same life experience, they have the same blind spots.
They miss the obvious flaws.
A 2020 study by the Boston Consulting Group (BCG) showed that companies with more diverse management teams had 19% higher revenues due to innovation. Why? Because different perspectives lead to better problem-solving. It’s not magic. It’s just math. If you have five people who all went to the same three colleges and grew up in the same neighborhoods, you don't have five perspectives. You have one perspective multiplied by five.
Moving Past the "DEI" Buzzwords
The term "diversity equity and inclusion" is being rebranded in some circles to things like "Belonging" or "Human Capital Management" because the original acronym has become so polarized.
Fine. Call it whatever you want.
But the underlying reality doesn't change:
- Diversity: The demographics. The "who."
- Equity: The systems. Is the pay fair? Is the access to mentorship equal?
- Inclusion: The culture. Can someone speak up without being ignored?
Think about the "Curb Cut Effect." When cities started putting ramps in sidewalks for people in wheelchairs, it didn't just help people in wheelchairs. It helped parents with strollers. It helped travelers with suitcases. It helped delivery drivers with dollies. Equity works the same way. When you make a workplace better for a marginalized group, you usually end up making it better for everyone. Clearer promotion criteria don't just help minority groups; they help the "quiet" high-performers of every background who were being overlooked because they didn't brag enough.
The Myth of the "Meritocracy"
We love the idea of a meritocracy. The best rise to the top!
But a true meritocracy can only exist if everyone starts at the same starting line. If one person is running a race on a paved track and the other is running through a swamp, the person who finishes first isn't necessarily the faster runner. They just had a better path.
Acknowledging this isn't "woke." It's being realistic about how the world works.
Research by the Kapor Center found that unfair treatment is the single largest driver of turnover in the tech industry, costing companies billions every year. People don't leave because the work is hard. They leave because they feel like the game is rigged against them.
How to Actually Do the Work
If you're a leader or even just an employee who wants to move the needle, you have to stop looking for "quick fixes." There aren't any.
- Audit the boring stuff. Look at your job descriptions. Are you requiring a Master's degree for a role that doesn't actually need one? You might be accidentally filtering out incredible candidates who couldn't afford grad school.
- Measure what matters. Don't just track who you hire. Track who stays. Track who gets promoted. If you see a massive drop-off of certain groups at the mid-management level, you have a systemic problem, not a pipeline problem.
- Kill the "Culture Fit" interview. Replace it with structured interviews where every candidate is asked the same set of questions based on specific competencies. It’s harder, but it’s the only way to minimize the "he seems like a guy I'd like to grab a beer with" bias.
- Pay for the work. If you're asking employees to lead "Diversity Committees" on top of their full-time jobs, pay them for it. Emotional labor is still labor.
- Acknowledge the friction. Diversity isn't always comfortable. In fact, diverse teams often feel less effective to the participants because there is more debate and less "groupthink." But the final output is almost always better.
The Bottom Line
The push for diversity equity and inclusion isn't going away, even if the names change. The world is getting more connected, not less. The talent pool is getting more global, not more local.
👉 See also: Why 1 Battery Park Plaza New York Is More Than Just a Typical Financial District Tower
Companies that insist on staying in the "old way" of doing things—relying on the same "old boy" networks and ignoring the systemic barriers that hold back talent—will eventually be outcompeted by companies that are brave enough to look at their own flaws.
It's not about being "nice." It's about being effective.
To move forward, stop thinking of this as a "project" with an end date. It's a lens. It’s a way of looking at your business operations, your product design, and your leadership style every single day. The goal isn't to reach a perfect percentage; it’s to build an environment where the most talented people can actually do their best work without being tripped up by hurdles that shouldn't be there in the first place.
Start by looking at your last three hires. Where did they come from? Who referred them? If the answer is "my friend from my last job," you've got work to do. Expand your circle. Question your "gut feelings." That’s where the real change starts.