Martha Ballard wasn't just a midwife. She was a witness. When I first cracked open Ariel Lawhon’s The Frozen River, I expected a cozy historical mystery set in the biting chill of 1789 Maine. What I actually found was a brutal, soot-stained exploration of how women navigated a legal system that basically viewed them as property. Honestly, the book is thick. It’s heavy. It’s also surprisingly fast-paced for a story about a woman trekking through snow to check on a corpse.
If you're leading a book club or just trying to wrap your head around the ending, you’ve probably realized that this isn't a "one-and-done" kind of read. People get heated about Martha. They get angry about the Kennebec River. Using the right discussion questions for The Frozen River helps move past the basic "did you like it?" and into the meat of why this story feels so relevant in 2026.
We have to talk about the ice. It’s a character. Lawhon frames the entire narrative around the freezing and thawing of the Kennebec, and that's not just for atmospheric vibes. It’s a ticking clock.
The Weight of the Diary and Martha’s Authority
One of the most frequent discussion questions for The Frozen River revolves around the reliability of Martha’s record-keeping. In the 18th century, a woman's word was worth very little in a courtroom, but Martha’s diary was a different beast. It was a legal ledger. It was a medical history.
Think about the moment Martha finds Joshua Burgess in the ice. She knows he’s one of the men accused of a horrific assault. She’s also the one tasked with the physical examination of the body. You have to wonder: does her personal bias bleed into her professional observations? Most readers say no, because Martha is almost pathologically honest, but it’s a great point of debate.
If you’re looking for a deep-cut question, try this: How does Martha’s role as a midwife—someone who sees the literal "blood and guts" of life—give her a different perspective on death than the men in the town?
The men see a crime. Martha sees a life that was lived and then discarded.
Justice vs. Law in Hallowell
There’s a massive gap between what is "legal" and what is "just" in this book. That’s why it hits so hard. When we look at discussion questions for The Frozen River, we can't ignore the rape of Rebecca Foster. It’s the catalyst for everything.
✨ Don't miss: Temuera Morrison as Boba Fett: Why Fans Are Still Divided Over the Daimyo of Tatooine
The town of Hallowell is a pressure cooker. You have the "gentlemen" like North and Burgess who think their status makes them untouchable. Then you have Martha, who is basically the only person willing to stand in the gap.
- Was Martha right to risk her family’s safety for Rebecca?
- Why did the community turn on the victim so quickly?
- In what ways has our modern legal system actually changed—and in what ways is it exactly the same as 1789?
Honestly, the scene where Martha has to testify is one of the most stressful things I've read in years. She isn't just fighting for Rebecca; she's fighting for the right to have her own expertise recognized. North tries to gaslight her. He tries to make her look like a hysterical old woman. It’s infuriating.
The Reality of the Ballard Marriage
Let’s talk about Ephraim. He’s not your typical historical fiction husband. Usually, the husband is either a total villain or a non-entity who stays out of the way. Ephraim is... complicated. He loves Martha, clearly. But his own pride and his precarious position as a surveyor nearly ruin them.
A lot of discussion questions for The Frozen River focus on their relationship because it feels so modern. They argue. They have a physical connection that Lawhon doesn't shy away from. They have to negotiate power.
Consider the moment Ephraim is jailed. Martha has to step up and run the household and the "business" in a way she never had to before. Does this shift their dynamic permanently? Or does Ephraim’s stint in jail just make him more protective? Some people find Ephraim’s choices frustrating, especially when he refuses to listen to Martha’s warnings about the North family. But that’s the reality of the time. Even a "good" man was still bound by the patriarchal structures of the 1700s.
The Symbolism of the Kennebec
The river is the heart of the book. It’s where the body is found, it’s the source of the town’s wealth, and it’s a constant physical barrier.
Lawhon uses the "cracking" of the ice as a metaphor for the breaking of secrets. When the river finally thaws, everything comes to the surface. Literally.
🔗 Read more: Why Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy Actors Still Define the Modern Spy Thriller
When you’re going through discussion questions for The Frozen River, ask your group about the sensory details. How did Lawhon make the cold feel like a physical weight? Martha is constantly described as being wrapped in layers, freezing, trudging through drifts. It emphasizes her isolation. She is alone in her pursuit of the truth, even when she’s in a room full of people.
The Comparison to the Real Martha Ballard
It is vital to remember that Martha Ballard was a real person. She lived from 1735 to 1812. She actually delivered over a thousand babies and kept a meticulous diary.
However, Lawhon takes liberties. This is a "what if" story. The real Martha didn't solve a murder mystery (as far as we know).
- Does adding a fictional murder plot cheapen the legacy of the real Martha Ballard?
- Or does it make her life more accessible to a modern audience?
Historian Laurel Thatcher Ulrich won a Pulitzer for A Midwife’s Tale, which is the definitive non-fiction look at Martha’s life. If you’ve read both, a great discussion point is comparing the "academic" Martha with the "fictional" Martha. Lawhon’s version is much more of a crusader. The real Martha was perhaps more pragmatic, just trying to survive the Maine winters.
Dealing with the Ending (Spoilers Ahead)
The resolution of the Burgess murder and the fate of Judge North are polarizing. Some readers feel like the "justice" served was too neat for such a gritty book. Others feel it was the only way to provide closure in a world where the law was rigged.
A key discussion question for The Frozen River regarding the ending is: Did the "villains" get what they deserved?
Think about the finality of the ice. The river takes what it wants. There’s a certain poetic justice in how things wrap up, but it leaves Martha changed. She isn't the same woman she was at the start of the winter. She’s seen the worst of her neighbors. She’s seen that even the "best" men in town are capable of silence in the face of evil.
💡 You might also like: The Entire History of You: What Most People Get Wrong About the Grain
Practical Insights for Your Next Reading
If you are planning to tackle this book for a group or just want to understand it better on a second pass, keep these themes in mind:
1. The Power of Documentation
Martha’s diary wasn't just a hobby. In a world where women were often erased from history, her writing was an act of rebellion. Pay attention to what she chooses not to write down versus what she records in detail.
2. Female Solidarity
The relationship between Martha and the other women—Rebecca, her daughters-in-law, even the ones she dislikes—is the backbone of the story. Men hold the legal power, but women hold the community together.
3. The Brutality of Nature
The setting isn't just a backdrop. The Maine winter is a lethal force. Lawhon uses the weather to heighten the stakes of every decision Martha makes. If she stays too long at a birth, she might die on the way home. That’s a level of stakes most modern mysteries can't touch.
Actionable Next Steps
To get the most out of your analysis of The Frozen River, you should look at the primary sources.
Start by browsing the digital archives of the real Martha Ballard diary. Seeing her actual handwriting and the repetitive, daily grind of her life adds a layer of reality that makes Lawhon’s fictionalization even more impressive. You can find these through the University of Richmond’s "do history" project.
Next, compare the legal definitions of the 1780s regarding "witness testimony" to how Martha is treated in the book. It’s eye-opening to see how little standing she actually had.
Finally, if you’re looking for your next read, check out Lawhon’s other works like I Was Anastasia or Code Name Hélène. She has a specific knack for taking real women who have been sidelined by history and putting them back at the center of the narrative.
The Frozen River is more than a whodunit. It’s a study of endurance. It asks how much one person can carry before they break—and whether the truth is worth the price of a peaceful life. Whether you’re discussing the legal ramifications of the 18th century or just the sheer terror of falling through thin ice, these questions should keep the conversation going long after the "thaw."