Did Trump Say He Would End the War in Ukraine? What’s Really Happening Now

Did Trump Say He Would End the War in Ukraine? What’s Really Happening Now

He said it. A lot.

If you followed the 2024 campaign, you heard Donald Trump claim he could settle the Russia-Ukraine conflict in 24 hours. He didn’t just say it once; he said it dozens of times. It was a staple of his rallies, a "set-piece" of his stump speech that suggested the most brutal war in Europe since 1945 was essentially a bad real estate deal waiting for a better negotiator.

But here we are in early 2026. The war is still grinding on.

People are still asking: did Trump say he would end the war in Ukraine, and if so, how's that actually going? The reality on the ground in Kyiv and Moscow is a lot messier than a one-day deadline. The "24-hour" talk has mostly evaporated, replaced by a complex, high-stakes diplomatic slog involving a 28-point peace plan, "free economic zones," and some very tense meetings in the Oval Office.

The Famous 24-Hour Claim: Fact vs. Rhetoric

Let’s be clear about what was actually said. During the 2024 election cycle, Trump repeatedly told voters that he would have the war "settled" even before his inauguration. He claimed his personal relationship with both Vladimir Putin and Volodymyr Zelenskyy would allow him to "knock heads" and get a deal done instantly.

At one point, he even suggested he’d tell Zelenskyy, "No more, you gotta make a deal," and tell Putin, "If you don't make a deal, we're gonna give [Ukraine] a lot. We're gonna give them more than they ever got if we have to."

💡 You might also like: Quién ganó para presidente en USA: Lo que realmente pasó y lo que viene ahora

It sounded simple. It wasn't.

Once the reality of the 2025 inauguration hit, that 24-hour window came and went. By April 2025, his own team started reframing the timeline. His special envoy to Ukraine, Keith Kellogg, began talking about a "100-day" goal. Even that proved optimistic.

The rhetoric changed because the math changed. You can't settle a war involving 20% of a country's territory and hundreds of thousands of casualties with a single phone call, no matter how much "art of the deal" you bring to the table.

What Does the "Trump Peace Plan" Actually Look Like?

We aren't just guessing anymore. Since late 2025, details of a specific U.S.-led diplomatic push have leaked. It’s often referred to as the "28-point plan," and it's being handled by a tight inner circle, including special envoy Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner.

Honestly, the details are a tough pill for almost everyone involved to swallow. Here is what has been floating around in the negotiations:

📖 Related: Patrick Welsh Tim Kingsbury Today 2025: The Truth Behind the Identity Theft That Fooled a Town

  • The Freeze: A ceasefire along the current front lines. This basically creates a "demilitarized zone" (DMZ) similar to North and South Korea.
  • Territorial Concessions: This is the big one. The plan reportedly asks Ukraine to de facto recognize Russian control over Crimea, Donetsk, and Luhansk.
  • NATO Neutrality: Ukraine would have to amend its constitution to commit to not joining NATO for a significant period—some reports say 15 to 20 years.
  • Security Guarantees: In exchange for staying out of NATO, Ukraine would get "reliable" security guarantees from the U.S., though what "reliable" means when you're not in the alliance is the subject of intense debate.
  • The "Carrot" for Russia: Lifting sanctions and potentially inviting Russia back into the G8.

Zelenskyy’s reaction? It’s been a rollercoaster. In late December 2025, after a meeting at Mar-a-Lago, Zelenskyy said the deal was "90% ready." But as he pointed out, that last 10% is where the war lives. It’s the territory. It’s the sovereignty.

The January 2026 Status: Where We Stand Today

As of this week—January 17, 2026—a high-level Ukrainian delegation is actually in Washington D.C. right now. They aren't there for a photo op. They are meeting with Witkoff and Kushner to try and finalize "post-war security guarantees."

There is talk of a signing ceremony at the World Economic Forum in Davos next week.

But don't hold your breath. While the U.S. and Ukraine are talking, Russia is still playing "weaponized winter." Just this morning, Russian strikes hit more than 20 settlements in the Kyiv region, knocking out power in freezing temperatures.

Putin hasn't fully signed on to anything. The Kremlin’s stance is still that they will only agree to a deal that addresses the "root causes"—which in Moscow-speak means Ukraine becoming a neutered buffer state.

👉 See also: Pasco County FL Sinkhole Map: What Most People Get Wrong

Why a deal is so hard to stick

  1. The Trust Gap: Nobody trusts Putin to stay on his side of the line.
  2. Internal Politics: Zelenskyy faces massive backlash at home if he "gives away" the Donbas.
  3. European Anxiety: Countries like Poland and the Baltics are terrified that a "Trump deal" just gives Russia time to re-arm for a bigger war in 2028 or 2030.

Did Trump Say He Would End the War in Ukraine? Yes. Is it Over? No.

The bottom line is that Donald Trump did make the promise, and he is actively trying to fulfill it through a "maximum pressure" style of diplomacy. He’s used the threat of cutting off aid to pull Zelenskyy to the table, and the threat of increasing aid to keep Putin interested.

It’s a high-stakes gamble. If it works, he’s a peacemaker. If it fails, he’s left with a fractured alliance and a rejuvenated Russia.

Actionable Insights: What to Watch for Next

If you're trying to figure out if this war is actually ending, stop watching the headlines about 24 hours and start watching these specific markers:

  • The Davos Summit (Next Week): If Trump and Zelenskyy appear together with a signed document, the ceasefire is real. If they don't, the "90% agreed" line was likely just posturing.
  • The DMZ Details: Watch for who polices the "demilitarized zone." If it’s European troops or UN peacekeepers, it has a chance. If it’s just a "pinky swear" between Moscow and Washington, it’ll collapse in months.
  • The Mineral Rights Factor: Recent reports suggest the Trump administration is pushing for a "minerals-for-security" deal where the U.S. gets access to Ukraine's rare-earth metals in exchange for reconstruction funds. This could be the "business" logic that makes the deal move forward.

The war hasn't ended in a day. It won't. But the shift from "total victory" to "painful compromise" is the current reality of the Trump era's approach to Ukraine. Keep your eyes on the security guarantees—that's the only thing that will determine if a "peace deal" is a real end or just a temporary pause.

To stay informed, look for updates specifically on the Steve Witkoff negotiations and the January 2026 Ukrainian delegation meetings in D.C., as these are the current rooms where the war's fate is being decided.