Did the Menendez brothers kill their parents? The truth behind the 1989 Beverly Hills murders

Did the Menendez brothers kill their parents? The truth behind the 1989 Beverly Hills murders

August 20, 1989. A hot night in Beverly Hills. Inside a $5 million mansion on North Elm Drive, Jose and Kitty Menendez were just sitting on their sofa, watching The Jurgens and eating blueberries. They never saw it coming. The front door burst open, and within seconds, the room turned into a literal war zone. When the smoke cleared, two of the most powerful people in Hollywood were dead. So, did the Menendez brothers kill their parents?

Yes. They did. Lyle and Erik Menendez have never denied pulling the triggers.

But if you think that’s the end of the story, you’re missing the point of why this case still haunts us decades later. It wasn't a "whodunit." It was a "whydunit." To understand why two brothers—who seemingly had everything—would walk into their parents' den with 12-gauge Mossberg shotguns, you have to look past the Versace sweaters and the $14 million estate.


The night that changed everything on North Elm Drive

People often forget how the brothers initially played it. They didn't just walk out with their hands up. Instead, they went to a movie theater to see Batman to set up an alibi, then came home and called 911. You can still hear the recording of Erik’s voice today—hysterical, screaming that "someone" had killed his parents.

The scene was so gruesome that police initially thought it was a professional mob hit. Jose Menendez, a high-flying executive at LIVE Entertainment, was shot point-blank in the back of the head. Kitty was shot several times, including once in the face while she was trying to crawl away.

For months, the brothers lived like they’d won the lottery. They spent roughly $700,000 in the first few weeks. Lyle bought a Rolex and a Porsche. Erik hired a private tennis coach. They moved into luxury condos. This "greed" narrative is what the prosecution eventually used to bury them, and honestly, looking at it from the outside, it looked like a classic case of rich kids getting rid of their parents for the inheritance.

How they actually got caught

It wasn't some high-tech forensics that cracked the case. It was a therapist's mistress.

✨ Don't miss: Why the Air France Crash Toronto Miracle Still Changes How We Fly

Erik, consumed by guilt, eventually confessed to his psychologist, Dr. Jerome Oziel. Now, normally, therapist-patient privilege would protect that. But Lyle reportedly threatened Oziel, which changed the legal landscape. When Judalon Smyth, Oziel’s mistress, went to the police, the house of cards collapsed. The brothers were arrested in March 1990.


Why did the Menendez brothers kill their parents? The abuse defense

This is where the case splits into two completely different realities.

During their 1993 trial, which was broadcast on Court TV and became a national obsession, the brothers told a harrowing story. They didn't kill for money, they said. They killed because they were terrified. They testified about years of horrific sexual, physical, and emotional abuse at the hands of their father, Jose. They claimed their mother, Kitty, knew about it and did nothing, or was an active participant in the psychological torment.

Leslie Abramson, their powerhouse defense attorney, argued that the brothers suffered from "imperfect self-defense." Basically, they believed they were in imminent danger of being killed by their parents to keep the abuse a secret.

The nuance of the first trial

It’s easy to look back and think it was a circus. It was. But it also resulted in two deadlocked juries. Many people at the time—and many people now, especially with the 2024 Netflix series Monsters and the Menendez + Menudo documentary—believe the brothers were victims of a "gilded cage" that was actually a torture chamber.

Then came the second trial in 1995.

🔗 Read more: Robert Hanssen: What Most People Get Wrong About the FBI's Most Damaging Spy

Things changed. The judge, Stanley Weisberg, significantly limited the evidence of abuse that could be presented. He didn't allow the jury to consider the "imperfect self-defense" charge. Without that context, the jury only saw two young men who shot their parents and spent their money.

They were convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to life without parole.


New evidence and the 2020s resurgence

You might be wondering why this is all over the news again in 2026. Why does it matter now?

Because of Roy Rosselló.

Rosselló, a former member of the boy band Menudo, came forward recently alleging that Jose Menendez had also drugged and raped him when he was a teenager in the 80s. This is a massive "corroborating witness" that the brothers never had in the 90s.

Then there’s the "Lyle letter." A letter Lyle wrote to his cousin, Andy Cano, months before the murders, recently surfaced. In it, he seemingly alludes to the ongoing abuse. For years, the prosecution argued the brothers made up the abuse stories after they were arrested. This letter suggests otherwise.

💡 You might also like: Why the Recent Snowfall Western New York State Emergency Was Different

Right now, the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s office has been reviewing this new evidence. There is a very real possibility—one that seemed impossible ten years ago—that the brothers could be resentenced or even granted a new trial.

Social media has played a huge part too. Gen Z has essentially "adopted" the Menendez brothers, viewing them as victims of a system that didn't understand male sexual abuse in the 1990s. There’s a massive cultural shift happening here. We view trauma differently now. We understand that "rich kids" can be victims too.


Fact-checking the common myths

There is so much noise around this case. Let’s get some things straight.

  • Did they kill for the money? The prosecution said yes, pointing to the $14 million estate. The defense said no, pointing to the fact that they were already wealthy and had access to money.
  • Was there proof of abuse? There was no physical medical evidence presented in the 90s, but there were several family members who testified to the "weird" and controlling nature of the household.
  • Are they in the same prison? For decades, they were separated. It was heartbreaking. But in 2018, they were finally reunited at the Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility in San Diego. They reportedly burst into tears when they finally saw each other.

Actionable insights: What to watch for next

If you're following this case, you need to look past the sensationalized headlines. Here is what actually determines the future for Lyle and Erik:

  • Habeas Corpus Petitions: The brothers' legal team has filed a petition based on the Rosselló testimony and the Cano letter. This is the primary legal vehicle for their potential release.
  • District Attorney Decisions: Keep an eye on the L.A. District Attorney's public statements. Political pressure and new evidence are weighing heavily on whether they support a resentencing.
  • Parole Boards: Even if they are resentenced to something less than "life without parole," they would still have to face a parole board to prove they are no longer a danger to society.

The question of did the Menendez brothers kill their parents is a closed chapter in a police report, but as a cultural and legal phenomenon, it’s still being written. It forces us to ask: what does justice look like for victims who become perpetrators? Whether you see them as cold-blooded killers or survivors who snapped, the Menendez case remains the ultimate litmus test for how we view crime, wealth, and the lasting scars of childhood trauma.

To stay informed, monitor the official California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) inmate locators for status changes and follow credible legal analysts who specialize in California criminal law. The next 12 to 18 months will likely be the most significant for the brothers since their conviction in 1996.