Nov. 22, 1963. Dealey Plaza. Everyone knows the grainy footage of the Lincoln Continental. But for decades, the same nagging question has haunted American history: did the CIA kill Kennedy? It’s not just a basement-dweller theory anymore. Even mainstream historians and former insiders admit the agency’s behavior after the shots rang out was, well, sketchy at best. Honestly, if you look at the sheer volume of "lost" files and redacted memos, it's easy to see why most of the public doesn't buy the "lone nut" story.
We're talking about an era where the CIA was actively trying to topple governments across the globe. They were poisoned-cigar deep in plots against Castro. So, the idea that they might turn that machinery inward isn't as crazy as it sounded in 1964. But let’s get into the weeds of what we actually know versus what makes for a good movie script.
The motive: Why the Agency hated JFK
To understand the suspicion, you have to look at the vibe in Langley in 1961. After the Bay of Pigs disaster, Kennedy was furious. He reportedly told an aide he wanted to "splinter the CIA into a thousand pieces and scatter it into the winds." He actually fired Allen Dulles, the legendary CIA director who had basically built the modern agency.
That's a lot of bad blood.
Kennedy was also pivoting on the Cold War. He was talking about a "Strategy of Peace" and reportedly wanted to pull advisors out of Vietnam. To the hardliners in the intelligence community, JFK wasn't just a boss they disliked—he was a national security threat. They saw him as soft on communism. When you have a group of people who believe they are the only ones standing between the U.S. and a Soviet takeover, they tend to get dangerous.
The Oswald Connection: Was he their guy?
Lee Harvey Oswald is the biggest sticking point. The official Warren Commission narrative says he was a lone actor, a Marxist loser who just wanted to be famous. But the records show the CIA was tracking him way more closely than they initially admitted.
👉 See also: Statesville NC Record and Landmark Obituaries: Finding What You Need
We know Oswald "defected" to the Soviet Union and then just... came back? During the height of the Cold War, a Marine defector returns from Russia and the government doesn't toss him in a dark room for ten years? It’s weird. Then there’s the "Mexico City" incident. Weeks before the assassination, Oswald was allegedly at the Soviet and Cuban embassies in Mexico. The CIA claimed for years they didn't have much on this, but later declassifications showed they were monitoring his every move there.
Did the CIA kill Kennedy? The evidence of a cover-up
There is a massive difference between "the CIA pulled the trigger" and "the CIA covered up what they knew." Most serious researchers, like Jefferson Morley or the late Gaeton Fonzi, lean toward the latter—at the very least.
- The Joannides Files: This is the smoking gun for many. George Joannides was a CIA officer who worked with a pro-student group (DRE) that had run-ins with Oswald in New Orleans. When the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) investigated in the 70s, the CIA didn't tell them Joannides was the group's handler. They basically sent the fox to guard the henhouse.
- The Medical Discrepancies: Multiple doctors at Parkland Hospital in Dallas described a large wound in the back of Kennedy's head, which would imply a shot from the front (the Grassy Knoll). The official autopsy photos from Bethesda look different.
- The E. Howard Hunt "Confession": Before he died, Watergate figure and CIA operative E. Howard Hunt allegedly told his son about a "Big Event" involving LBJ and CIA officers. Some take this as gospel; others think it was an old man's tall tale.
It's messy.
Basically, the CIA had a legal and professional obligation to tell the Warren Commission everything they knew about Oswald. They didn't. Whether that's because they were involved in the hit or just because they didn't want their embarrassing failures (like failing to stop a guy they were watching) to go public is the $64,000 question.
The "Deep State" before it was a buzzword
Back then, they called it the "Establishment." The 1975 Church Committee proved the CIA was doing things that sounded like sci-fi: mind control (MKUltra), spying on Americans, and assassination plots against foreign leaders. If they were willing to kill Patrice Lumumba or Rafael Trujillo, was a U.S. President really off-limits?
✨ Don't miss: St. Joseph MO Weather Forecast: What Most People Get Wrong About Northwest Missouri Winters
Kennedy was a disruptor. He was bypassing the usual backchannels and using his brother, Bobby, as a private enforcer. This rankled the old guard.
The George Joannides mystery
If you want to know why people still ask did the CIA kill Kennedy, you have to look at Joannides. In 1963, he was the Chief of the Psychological Warfare branch in Miami. He was funding the very group that Oswald got into a public fight with on a New Orleans street corner.
When the government reinvestigated the case in 1978, the CIA brought Joannides out of retirement to act as the liaison to the investigators. He never mentioned he was connected to the Oswald story. That isn't just a "mistake." That's a deliberate operation to mislead Congress. Why hide a dead man's connections unless those connections lead somewhere you don't want people looking?
What the 2023-2024 Document Releases Changed
We're still getting new papers. Under the JFK Records Act, thousands of documents have been released in the last few years. While there isn't a memo that says "Hey, let's go to Dallas," there is a lot of "smoke."
We found out the CIA was intercepting Oswald’s mail. We found out that a high-ranking CIA officer named James Angleton, the legendary and paranoid counter-intelligence chief, was obsessed with Oswald long before Dallas. The documents show a level of surveillance that makes the "he was just a random guy" argument feel pretty flimsy.
🔗 Read more: Snow This Weekend Boston: Why the Forecast Is Making Meteorologists Nervous
But here is the catch.
Even with all the shady behavior, we still lack a "ballistic" link between a CIA officer and the rifle in the Texas School Book Depository. We have plenty of circumstantial evidence of a conspiracy, but the hard evidence remains locked in the "maybe" pile.
The "Two Oswalds" Theory
Some researchers think the CIA used a double. It sounds like a spy novel, but there are credible reports of "Oswald" being in two places at once in the months leading up to November. One Oswald is a lousy shot who can't hold a job; the other is a sophisticated operative speaking fluent Russian. If the CIA was running a "false flag" or using Oswald as a "patsy" (his own words), it fits their standard operating procedure for the 1960s.
Real-world takeaways for history buffs
You can spend a lifetime in this rabbit hole. People have. If you're trying to make sense of the noise, here's how to look at it:
- Follow the Joannides trail. Forget the "magic bullet" for a second and look at George Joannides. It’s the most documented instance of the CIA actively subverting a Kennedy investigation.
- Context is everything. You can't understand Dallas without understanding the Cold War, the Cuban Missile Crisis, and the internal war between JFK and the Pentagon.
- The "Lone Nut" vs. "Conspiracy" isn't a binary. It's possible Oswald fired the shots but was goaded, funded, or "handled" by people with ties to intelligence. That's still a conspiracy, even if the CIA didn't technically "pull the trigger."
The most frustrating part? We might never know for sure. The people who were there are mostly dead. The files that were burned in the 70s are gone forever. But the fact that the government is still fighting to keep certain pages redacted in 2026 tells you everything you need to know. There is still something there that they think we can't handle.
Next Steps for Research
If you want to get past the Hollywood versions of this story, start with the actual primary sources. Read the HSCA's 1979 report, which actually concluded that Kennedy was "probably" killed as a result of a conspiracy—a fact many people forget. Look into the Mary Ferrell Foundation database; it’s the most comprehensive collection of declassified JFK records on the internet. Finally, compare the Warren Commission's findings with the JFK Records Act releases from the last three years to see exactly what the government was hiding for five decades. Understanding the mechanics of the cover-up is often more revealing than trying to solve the murder itself.