He didn't do it.
If you grew up believing Benjamin Franklin "invented" electricity while standing in a muddy field with a silk kite, you’ve been fed a slightly charming, mostly inaccurate myth. It's a classic bit of American folklore. But here is the reality: electricity isn't an invention. It's a natural force. You can't invent it any more than you can invent gravity or the wind.
Franklin knew this. He wasn't some lucky amateur stumbling onto a spark; he was a meticulous scientist—arguably the most famous "electrician" of his era—who was obsessed with proving a specific theory. He wanted to show that lightning and the static sparks people played with in parlors were the exact same thing.
The Kite, the Key, and the Common Myth
Let's clear the air. If lightning had actually struck Franklin’s kite, he wouldn't be on the $100 bill. He’d be a charcoal smudge in a Philadelphia field.
Most people picture a massive bolt of blue lightning hitting the kite and traveling down a wet string to a key, which Franklin then touched. Wrong. In June 1752, Franklin and his son William (who was 21 at the time, not a small child) headed out as a storm approached. They didn't wait for the heavy rain. They waited for the "electric fire" in the clouds to polarize the kite.
Basically, the kite picked up the ambient electrical charge from the storm clouds. The silk string became damp, which made it conductive. The charge traveled down to a metal key tied near Franklin's hand. When he moved his knuckle toward the key, a tiny spark jumped. It was static electricity. It was the same "oomph" you get when you scuff your socks on a carpet and touch a doorknob. This proved that the heavens were filled with the same fluid that scientists were generating with glass friction machines back in their labs.
Why Ben Franklin and Electricity are Forever Linked
If he didn't "invent" it, why does he get all the credit?
🔗 Read more: I posted that? How to delete TikTok story posts before everyone sees them
Because Franklin gave us the language we still use today. Before him, people thought electricity was two different kinds of fluids—"vitreous" and "resinous." Franklin looked at the data and disagreed. He proposed a "single fluid" theory. He was the one who coined the terms positive and negative. He gave us words like battery, charge, conductor, and condenser.
Honestly, it’s hard to overstate how much he simplified the field. He turned a chaotic series of parlor tricks into an actual branch of physics.
The Leyden Jar and the "Battery"
Back in the 1740s, the cutting edge of tech was the Leyden jar. It was essentially a glass jar coated with metal foil that could store an electrical charge. It was the first capacitor. Franklin hooked a bunch of these jars together in a series.
He thought they looked like a row of cannons. So, he called it a "battery."
He wasn't trying to power a smartphone. He was trying to figure out how to move "fire" from one place to another. He even hosted "electrical dinner parties" where he attempted to electrocute a turkey and roast it using electrical sparks. It didn't go perfectly—he once accidentally shocked himself so hard he was knocked unconscious. He later wrote that it was "a ceremony I by no means intended."
The Invention That Actually Mattered: The Lightning Rod
The real reason Ben Franklin's electricity experiments changed the world wasn't just theoretical. It was practical. It was about saving lives.
In the 18th century, a lightning strike was a death sentence for a building. Houses were made of wood. If a storm hit, the place burned down. Church steeples were the highest points in any town and were constantly getting blasted. People actually thought lightning was a sign of God's wrath.
Franklin had a different idea.
He realized that if he could draw the "fire" out of the clouds quietly and channel it into the ground, he could protect property. This led to the lightning rod.
- He suggested an iron rod with a sharp point.
- The rod would be attached to the top of a building.
- A wire would run from the rod down into the earth.
It worked. It was one of the first times humanity successfully "tamed" a natural disaster using physics. Interestingly, there was a huge political row over this. King George III insisted on blunt-ended lightning rods because he didn't want to use Franklin’s "rebellious" pointed design. Physics doesn't care about politics, though; the pointed ones worked better.
What Most People Get Wrong About the Timeline
It’s easy to think Franklin was the only guy working on this. He wasn't. In fact, he wasn't even the first to successfully fly a kite or use a rod to catch lightning.
A Frenchman named Thomas-François Dalibard actually beat Franklin to the punch by a few weeks. He used a 40-foot tall iron rod in Marly-la-Ville to draw sparks from a storm in May 1752. He followed instructions Franklin had published earlier. News traveled slow in the 1750s. Franklin didn't know he'd been "scooped" until later.
But Franklin's kite experiment became the legend because he was a master of self-promotion and a brilliant writer. He knew how to tell a story that stuck.
Was it Just a Hobby?
Sorta. Franklin was a polymath. He did this in his "retirement" after he made a fortune in printing. But he didn't patent the lightning rod. He believed that because we benefit from the inventions of others, we should be happy to provide our own for free.
Think about that. One of the most important safety inventions in human history was given away for the public good.
Deep Nuance: The "Fluid" Mistake
Franklin wasn't 100% right. He thought electricity flowed from positive to negative. Because of his guess, we still draw circuit diagrams that way today.
Much later, scientists realized that electrons—the things actually moving—carry a negative charge and move from the negative terminal to the positive one. So, in a sense, Franklin got the direction of the flow backward. We’ve been living with that "error" in our textbooks for over 250 years, but his math still holds up for most practical applications. It's a testament to how solid his foundational work was.
The Legacy of the Philadelphia Experiments
When you flip a light switch, you're interacting with a system that has Franklin’s DNA all over it. He bridged the gap between "lightning is a mysterious act of God" and "electricity is a tool we can manage."
He proved that the universe followed rules.
He showed that those rules could be understood through observation and a little bit of bravery (or recklessness, depending on how you view the kite incident).
How to Apply Franklin’s "Electric" Logic Today
Understanding the history is cool, but Franklin’s approach to discovery is actually a blueprint for modern problem-solving. If you want to think like the man who "tamed" lightning, start here:
- Obsess over the "Why": Franklin didn't just see a spark; he asked if it was the same spark as the one in the sky. Cross-pollinate your ideas. Look for patterns between unrelated fields.
- Test Small Before Going Big: He didn't build a massive tower first. He used a silk kite and a string. Validate your theories with the "Minimum Viable Product" before you risk your life (or your career).
- Standardize the Language: If you’re leading a project, define your terms. Half of Franklin’s success was just giving everyone a common vocabulary (Positive/Negative). It stops confusion before it starts.
- Share the Wins: Franklin’s refusal to patent his rod led to faster adoption and more lives saved. In the modern world, "Open Source" is the ultimate Franklin move.
- Check the Grounding: Literally. Ensure your "systems"—whether they are electrical, financial, or personal—have a way to discharge stress safely. Without a "ground," things burn.
The next time a storm rolls in, don't go outside with a kite. That’s dangerous and, frankly, unnecessary. Instead, look at the lightning and realize that you’re seeing a massive version of the same force that’s currently powering the device in your hand—a force we only understand because a guy in Philadelphia decided to go for a walk in the rain.
Practical Next Step: If you're interested in the physics of how Franklin's "battery" worked compared to modern ones, research the chemical redox reactions in a standard AA battery. It's a very different process than the static storage of a Leyden jar, but it uses the exact same principles of charge balance that Franklin first described.