It sounds like a glitch in the simulation. How does a woman with 18 number-one hits and a career spanning six decades walk away from the most prestigious night in music without a single competitive trophy for her songs? We're talking about the woman who basically invented the modern pop diva blueprint. If you look at the history of Diana Ross at the Grammys, it’s a weird, frustrating, and ultimately fascinating journey through snubs and late-stage apologies.
Honestly, it’s wild. Most people just assume she has a shelf full of them. She doesn't. Or at least, she didn't for the longest time.
The Shocking Math of the Snubs
Let's look at the numbers because they genuinely don't make sense. Diana Ross has been nominated 13 times. That’s a lot of dresses and a lot of sitting in the front row waiting for your name to be called. From her early days with The Supremes to her massive solo run in the '70s and '80s, the Academy just kept passing her over.
Her first nod was back in 1965 for "Baby Love." Then came "Stop! In the Name of Love" in '66. Nothing. Even when she went solo and dropped "Ain't No Mountain High Enough"—a song that is practically a secular hymn at this point—she lost the Best Female Contemporary Vocal Performance to Dionne Warwick.
It sorta became a pattern.
👉 See also: Kate Moss Family Guy: What Most People Get Wrong About That Cutaway
- 1971: "Ain't No Mountain High Enough" (Nominated)
- 1974: "Touch Me in the Morning" (Nominated)
- 1977: "Love Hangover" (Nominated)
- 1982: "Endless Love" (Nominated twice)
That 1982 snub was particularly brutal. "Endless Love" with Lionel Richie spent nine weeks at number one. It was the biggest duet in history at the time. Yet, when the Grammys rolled around, they gave Record of the Year to Kim Carnes for "Bette Davis Eyes." No shade to Kim, but come on.
The Lifetime Achievement "Correction"
By 2012, the Recording Academy seemed to realize they had a massive problem on their hands. You can't have the "Most Successful Female Singer of All Time" (according to Guinness) without a Grammy. So, they did what they always do when they've ignored a legend for too long: they gave her the Lifetime Achievement Award.
It was a big moment. She showed up looking incredible in a black suit with silver cuffs, proving that she didn't need a gold gramophone to be the most important person in the room.
But wait, it gets better. In 2023, she actually won a second Lifetime Achievement Award as a member of The Supremes. She's the first woman to win that honor twice. It’s a bit of a "sorry we missed you the first twelve times" gesture, but hey, a win is a win.
✨ Don't miss: Blink-182 Mark Hoppus: What Most People Get Wrong About His 2026 Comeback
That 2019 Birthday Performance
If you want to understand the energy of Diana Ross at the Grammys, you have to watch the 2019 footage. It was her 75th birthday celebration. Most 75-year-olds are slowing down, but Ms. Ross decided to take over the entire show.
She was introduced by her grandson, Raif-Henok Emmanuel Kendrick, who was nine at the time and honestly better at public speaking than half the adults there. Diana emerged in this massive, billowing red gown that took up half the stage. She didn't just sing; she worked the room.
She walked into the audience, looked the biggest stars in the world in the eye, and told them, "Don't be lazy!"
She had everyone—from J.Lo to Kacey Musgraves—standing up and swaying. She ended the set by literally shouting, "Happy Birthday to Me!" It was the ultimate power move. It wasn't about the awards anymore. It was about the fact that she was still there, still sounding like "angelic honey," and still out-dressing everyone half her age.
🔗 Read more: Why Grand Funk’s Bad Time is Secretly the Best Pop Song of the 1970s
Presentation and Presence in 2025
Even as recently as 2025, she’s still the one the Academy calls when they need a dose of real star power. She showed up to present Song of the Year wearing a sequined bodysuit and a sheer white cape. It was very "vintage Vegas meets futuristic goddess."
Seeing her on that stage, it's clear the industry treats her with a level of reverence that transcends a trophy count. She is the bridge between the Motown era and the modern pop machine. Without her, there is no Beyoncé. There is no Janet Jackson.
Why did she never win a competitive one?
There are a few theories about why she kept losing during her peak. Some experts argue that during the '70s and '80s, the Grammy voters were notoriously conservative and often split the "R&B" and "Pop" votes in ways that hurt crossover artists.
Others think she was just unlucky with the competition. In the years she was nominated, she was up against absolute giants like Barbra Streisand, Aretha Franklin, and Natalie Cole. It was a crowded field of vocal powerhouses.
What to Watch for Next
If you’re a fan or just a student of music history, don't just look at the win-loss record. To truly appreciate her Grammy legacy, you should:
- Watch the 2019 Performance: It’s on YouTube. Look for the moment she tells the crowd to "Reach Out and Touch." It's a masterclass in stage presence.
- Listen to "Thank You" (2021): This album earned her a 2023 nomination for Best Traditional Pop Vocal Album. Even in her late 70s, the Recording Academy is finally paying attention to her new work, not just her old hits.
- Study the Fashion: From the 1998 all-leather look to the 2012 tuxedo, her red carpet choices are a timeline of how to age with absolute defiance and glamour.
The reality of Diana Ross at the Grammys is that she didn't need the Academy's validation to become an icon, but the Academy definitely needed hers to stay relevant. She’s the ultimate proof that you don't need a shelf full of "Best Solo Performance" awards to be the undisputed Boss.