Military spending is huge. It’s also kinda controversial, depending on who you ask at a dinner party. But if you’re looking at your portfolio and wondering where the stability is when the world feels like it’s constantly on fire, a defense and aerospace etf usually enters the conversation pretty quickly. People think these funds are just about Raytheon or Lockheed Martin building bigger missiles. Honestly, that’s only half the story.
The sector is weirdly hybridized now.
You have the "defense" side, which is dictated by government contracts, geopolitical tensions in places like Eastern Europe or the South China Sea, and the slow-moving gears of the Pentagon. Then you have "aerospace." This is the commercial side—think Boeing or Airbus. When people start flying again or when airlines decide their fleet is looking a bit dusty, these stocks move. It's a strange marriage of taxpayer money and global tourism.
Investing here isn't a guaranteed win. Far from it.
What’s Actually Inside a Defense and Aerospace ETF?
If you crack open a fund like the iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF (ITA) or the Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA), you’re going to see the "Big Five" almost immediately. We’re talking about Lockheed Martin, RTX (formerly Raytheon), Northrop Grumman, General Dynamics, and Boeing. These companies are the backbone. They have what's basically a "moat" the size of the Atlantic Ocean because the barriers to entry are insane. You can't just start a fighter jet company in your garage.
But there’s a nuance people miss.
The supply chain is where the real action happens. Beyond the big names, these ETFs hold companies like TransDigm Group or Howmet Aerospace. These guys make the specialized components—the fasteners, the engine blades, the sensors—that the big guys can't function without. TransDigm, for instance, is often called the "TransDigm of aerospace" because they have such a stranglehold on proprietary parts that they can maintain margins that would make a tech company jealous.
💡 You might also like: Mark Your Calendar: When is Last Day to File Taxes 2025 and Why You Can't Afford to Miss It
Different ETFs weight these differently.
Some are market-cap weighted. This means the biggest companies get the most money. If Boeing has a bad day because a door plug falls off a plane (again), the whole ETF feels it. Others use "equal weighting." This gives the smaller, scrappier sub-contractors more influence. If you're betting on innovation in drone tech or satellite arrays rather than just the legacy giants, how the ETF is built matters more than the ticker symbol itself.
The "Monopsony" Problem
Ever heard of a monopsony? It’s like a monopoly, but instead of one seller, there’s only one buyer. In the world of a defense and aerospace etf, the primary buyer is the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD).
This is a blessing and a curse.
On one hand, the government doesn't go bankrupt. They have "sticky" revenue. Once a contract is signed for the F-35 program, that money is flowing for decades. It’s predictable. On the other hand, the government is a nightmare of a customer. They can change their minds based on who is in the White House. They can audit your margins. They can delay payments because of a debt ceiling standoff in D.C.
It’s a lumpy business.
Companies often spend years in "R&D" (Research and Development) losing money before a single unit is sold. You have to be okay with that timeline. If you’re looking for the rapid-fire growth of a SaaS startup, you’re in the wrong place. This is a game of "long cycles." We are talking ten, twenty, thirty years for a platform to fully mature.
The Commercial Flip Side
Aerospace isn't just about stealth bombers. It’s about the 737 Max and the A320neo.
When the economy is humming, people travel. Airlines order planes. This creates a backlog that can stretch for a decade. Right now, Boeing and Airbus have backlogs that are essentially mountains of cash waiting to be collected. But—and this is a big but—the supply chain is currently a mess. Post-2020, getting the titanium, the chips, and the skilled labor to actually build these planes has been a headache.
So, you see this weird situation: demand is through the roof, but the companies can't ship the product fast enough. An ETF helps mitigate the risk of one specific company having a manufacturing meltdown, but it won't shield you from industry-wide labor shortages.
Geopolitics as a Market Mover
It sounds cynical, but conflict drives this sector.
When the news cycle is dominated by talk of "peer competitors" or regional instability, defense stocks tend to catch a bid. We’ve seen this recently with the massive shift in European defense policy. Countries that haven't spent money on their militaries since the Cold War are suddenly opening their wallets. Germany, for example, did a complete 180 on their defense spending.
But don't get it twisted.
The market often prices these events in incredibly fast. By the time you read about a new conflict on your phone, the "defense premium" might already be baked into the price of the defense and aerospace etf. You aren't "beating the market" by buying the news; you're just joining the crowd. The real value is found in the long-term trend of "re-globalization" and the modernization of aging military tech.
Most of our current fleet—from ships to planes—is old. Replacing it is a requirement, not a luxury, for the DoD.
The ESG Dilemma
We have to talk about ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) investing. For a few years, defense stocks were the "pariahs" of the investing world. Many large institutional funds literally banned them. They were lumped in with tobacco and gambling as "sin stocks."
That changed.
Specifically, the conflict in Ukraine shifted the narrative. Suddenly, "defense" was re-categorized by some as a "social good" because it protects democracy. You can agree or disagree with that—it doesn't matter. What matters is that the flow of money changed. When big pension funds start allowing defense stocks back into their portfolios, the prices go up.
However, some investors still won't touch a defense and aerospace etf on principle. If you're someone who wants a "clean" portfolio, you're going to have a hard time here. These companies build things designed for destruction. It's a reality you have to square with your own conscience before hitting the "buy" button.
Space: The Final Frontier (for your Money)
"Aerospace" is increasingly becoming just "Space."
We aren't just talking about NASA anymore. The commercialization of space is a legitimate pillar of these ETFs now. Companies like Northrop Grumman and Lockheed are heavily involved in the Artemis missions and satellite constellations. While SpaceX is still private (and therefore not in your standard ETF), the companies that provide the ground infrastructure and the payloads are very much public.
Space is a high-risk, high-reward tailwind.
It’s mostly speculative right now in terms of pure profit, but the strategic importance is massive. Whoever controls the "high ground" of orbit controls global communications and GPS. That makes space spending almost "recession-proof." The government isn't going to stop funding GPS satellites just because the GDP dipped by 1%.
Why Costs Are Exploding (and Why That’s Good for Shareholders)
Modern warfare is becoming "software-defined."
In the old days, you just built a heavy tank. Now, that tank needs to be a mobile data center. It needs AI for target acquisition, electronic warfare suites to jam drones, and encrypted mesh networking. This transition from "hardware" to "software and sensors" is driving up the cost of every unit.
For the companies, this is great. Software has higher margins than bent metal.
When you buy a defense and aerospace etf, you are increasingly buying a "tech" fund in disguise. L3Harris and Mercury Systems are perfect examples of this. They don't build the ships; they build the brains inside the ships. As the world moves toward "autonomous" systems and drone swarms, the value shifts from the hull of the boat to the code running the sensors.
Practical Steps for the Retail Investor
Don't just jump in because the world looks scary. That’s an emotional trade, and emotional trades usually end in tears.
First, check the expense ratios. Some of these niche ETFs charge a premium. Anything over 0.45% or 0.50% starts to get pricey for what is essentially a sector play. You want to keep your costs low because this sector can go sideways for years at a time.
Second, look at the "Commercial vs. Defense" split. If you think the travel industry is about to tank because of a recession, stay away from ETFs that are heavy on Boeing. If you think global tensions are the main driver, look for funds that lean into the "pure-play" defense contractors.
Third, understand the "Budget Cycle." The U.S. government operates on a fiscal year that ends in September. Watch for the "National Defense Authorization Act" (NDAA). This is the bill that actually says how much money the Pentagon gets. If the bill is bigger than expected, the ETFs usually pop. If it’s stuck in committee, things get boring (and red).
Actionable Insights for Your Portfolio:
- Audit your exposure: Look at your broad S&P 500 funds first. You probably already own a lot of Lockheed and Boeing. Don't "over-weight" yourself by accident.
- Time your entry: These stocks often dip when "peace talks" are mentioned. If you believe in the long-term "modernization" story, these dips are your entry points, not the spikes during a crisis.
- Watch the debt: Defense companies carry a lot of debt because their projects are so capital-intensive. In a high-interest-rate environment, their interest payments eat into the dividends.
- Pick your flavor: * ITA (iShares): Heavy on the big names, very liquid.
- PPA (Invesco): More diversified, includes more "mid-cap" tech-focused defense firms.
- XAR (SPDR): Equal-weighted, so the "small guys" have as much say as the "big guys." This is usually more volatile but can offer higher growth.
Investing in a defense and aerospace etf is a bet on the world staying complicated. It's a bet that nations will continue to value security and that humans will continue to want to fly across oceans. It’s not a "get rich quick" scheme. It’s a slow, grinding, industrial play that offers a unique kind of hedge against a chaotic world.
Do your homework. Check the holdings. And remember that in this sector, the government is the one holding the checkbook. You're just along for the ride.
Next Steps for Implementation:
Start by comparing the top three ETFs (ITA, PPA, XAR) on a site like ETF.com to see the "overlap" with your current holdings. Decide if you want a "heavy-hitter" approach (ITA) or a "disruptor" approach (XAR). Once you've picked a fund, consider "Dollar Cost Averaging" over six months rather than a lump sum. This protects you from the volatility that comes every time a politician gives a speech about budget cuts or a new treaty is signed. Look for the "backlog" numbers in the quarterly earnings of the top five holdings; if the backlogs are growing, the long-term thesis is usually intact.