Ever feel like the world is just a series of impending disasters waiting to happen? Climate change, AI taking over, resource depletion—it’s a lot. Most people look at the future and see a ceiling. They see a finite box we’re trapped in.
But David Deutsch sees something else entirely.
🔗 Read more: Why Your Battery for Heated Gloves Always Dies (and How to Fix It)
Honestly, The Beginning of Infinity is probably the most defiant book ever written. It’s not just "optimistic" in a greeting-card sort of way. It’s a rigorous, mathematical, and philosophical argument that we are at the literal start of an infinite climb. David Deutsch, a pioneer of quantum computing at Oxford, basically argues that if the laws of physics don't forbid something, then it’s achievable.
The only thing standing in our way? Knowledge. Or rather, a temporary lack of it.
What is a "Good Explanation" Anyway?
Most of us were taught that science is about observing things and then making a rule. You see the sun rise 1,000 times, so you induce that it’ll rise tomorrow. Deutsch says this is total nonsense. He calls it "empiricism," and he thinks it’s a trap.
Think about it. If you just go by what you see, the Earth looks flat and stationary. The sun looks like it’s moving. To get to the truth, you have to reject what your eyes are telling you and create a theory—a conjecture.
But not all theories are equal.
A "good explanation" in Deutsch’s world is one that is hard to vary. This is the secret sauce of his whole philosophy. If you tell me the seasons change because of a Greek myth about Persephone going to the underworld, that’s a bad explanation. Why? Because I could easily swap Persephone for a different god, or say she goes to the moon instead of the underworld, and the "explanation" still fits the same facts.
It’s easy to vary.
Compare that to the tilt of the Earth’s axis. If you change the angle of the tilt in your model, the predicted seasons won't match reality anymore. The details are locked in. They are "reachy." When an explanation is hard to vary, it often solves problems it wasn't even designed for. That’s how we ended up knowing what stars are made of without ever touching one.
The Myth of the "Spaceship Earth"
There’s this popular idea that Earth is a perfect, delicate life-support system and humans are just trashing the place. Deutsch hates this. He thinks it’s a dangerous misconception.
In The Beginning of Infinity, he points out that for most of human history, the "natural" environment was trying to kill us. It gave us malaria, starvation, and freezing winters. The biosphere isn't a "support system"; it’s a place where we’ve survived by using knowledge to transform it.
We aren't passengers on a spaceship. We are the pilots who are still building the ship while we fly it.
Why Static Societies Die
He spends a good chunk of the book talking about "static" vs. "dynamic" societies. It's kinda fascinating.
- Static Societies: These are cultures that fear change. They think they already have all the answers—usually through tradition or religion. Their main goal is to prevent the "wrong" ideas from spreading.
- Dynamic Societies: This is us (mostly) since the Enlightenment. We thrive on criticism. We assume our current ideas are probably wrong, or at least incomplete, and we actively try to break them to find better ones.
The scary part? Static societies are the default in human history. The Enlightenment was a weird, beautiful fluke. Deutsch warns that if we stop valuing criticism and start acting like our current "consensus" is final, we revert to being static. And static societies eventually hit a problem they can't solve. Then they go extinct.
💡 You might also like: What is the Most Advanced AI? Here is What’s Actually Winning in 2026
The Reality of the Multiverse
You can't talk about David Deutsch without talking about quantum physics. He’s one of the main proponents of the Many Worlds Interpretation.
To him, this isn't some sci-fi gimmick. It’s the simplest explanation of how the world works. When a quantum particle has two options, the universe doesn't "choose" one; it branches. There are an infinite number of versions of you reading this right now.
Why does this matter for progress? Because it means reality is much deeper and more complex than what we perceive. It reinforces the idea that we are just at the beginning. If the universe is infinite in its branching, our potential to understand it is also infinite.
Problems are Inevitable, but Soluble
This is the mantra of the book.
Bad stuff will happen. New technology will create new problems. But Deutsch argues that every problem is just a lack of knowledge. If we have a problem we can't solve yet, it’s not because the universe is "finite"—it’s because we haven't been creative enough to find the solution.
Actionable Insights: How to Think Like Deutsch
You don't need a PhD in physics to apply these ideas.
- Stop looking for authority. Don't believe things just because a famous person or a "system" said so. Look for the explanation that is hardest to vary.
- Embrace the "Fallibilist" mindset. Start every project by assuming you are partially wrong. This isn't being self-deprecating; it’s being rational. If you're wrong, you can improve. If you think you're "right," you're stuck.
- Focus on "Universal" systems. Whether you're coding or building a business, look for solutions that have "reach." A tool that solves one specific problem is okay; a tool that creates a framework for solving thousands of future problems is "The Beginning of Infinity" in action.
- Be a rational optimist. Optimism isn't thinking things will just "work out." It’s the belief that all evils are due to lack of knowledge, and knowledge can be created.
Everything we see around us—the internet, medicine, flight—would have looked like literal magic to someone 500 years ago. Deutsch’s point is that 500 years from now, our current "high-tech" world will look like the Stone Age. We aren't nearing the end of history. We are just getting warmed up.
✨ Don't miss: Apple Store in Aspen Grove: What Most People Get Wrong About Shopping There
The next step is to look at a "unsolvable" problem in your own life or work and ask: "What specific piece of knowledge am I missing that would make this a simple engineering task?" Usually, the answer is more exciting than the problem itself.