You’ve seen the picture. Maybe you’ve even seen it in person, though honestly, if you saw it before 2006, you weren’t looking at the same animal. The Damien Hirst tiger shark—officially titled The Physical Impossibility of Death in the Mind of Someone Living—is probably the most famous piece of contemporary art from the last thirty years. It’s also a bit of a lie.
It’s a 14-foot predator suspended in a tank of blue-ish formaldehyde. It looks like it’s coming for you. But the story of how it got there, why it started rotting, and why the "original" is currently sitting in a different shark's skin is way weirder than most art history books let on.
The $12 Million Fish That Almost Melted
In 1991, Damien Hirst was a young artist with more balls than money. Charles Saatchi, the advertising mogul, gave him an open checkbook. "Whatever you want to make," basically. Hirst decided he wanted a shark "big enough to eat you."
He didn't go to a gallery. He called post offices in Australia. He offered £4,000 to anyone who could catch a tiger shark and ship it to London. Eventually, someone did.
The total bill? About £50,000.
At the time, the British tabloids had a field day. The Sun ran a headline: "£50,000 For Fish Without Chips." It was the ultimate "my kid could do that" moment for the public. But Hirst wasn't just putting a fish in a tank. He was trying to freeze the concept of death. The problem is, nature doesn't like being frozen.
Why the original shark "died" twice
Here is the thing about formaldehyde: it's not magic. If you don't do it right, the specimen rots from the inside out.
📖 Related: Alfonso Cuarón: Why the Harry Potter 3 Director Changed the Wizarding World Forever
Hirst’s team in 1991 didn't really know what they were doing with a creature that size. They put the shark in a 5% formaldehyde solution, but they didn't inject the fluid into the deep organs.
Slowly, the shark began to fall apart.
Skin peeled. The water turned a murky, swampy green. It started looking less like a terrifying predator and more like a soggy gray blanket. By the time hedge-fund billionaire Steve Cohen bought it in 2004 for a reported $8 million to $12 million, the shark was a disaster.
The buyer was basically buying a tank of rotting soup.
Replacing the Irreplaceable
Imagine buying a classic Ferrari and being told the engine is actually a pile of rust, so the dealer is just going to swap it for a new one. That’s what happened here.
Hirst offered to replace the shark.
👉 See also: Why the Cast of Hold Your Breath 2024 Makes This Dust Bowl Horror Actually Work
This sparked a massive philosophical war in the art world. If you replace the shark, is it the same artwork?
- The Purists: They argued that the original "object" was the art. If that's gone, it’s just a copy.
- Hirst’s View: He argued the "idea" was the art. The shark is just a material, like paint. If you run out of blue paint, you buy more blue.
- The Scientists: They just wanted to know how to stop the next one from liquefying.
In 2006, they caught a new shark. It was a female tiger shark, roughly the same age and size. This time, they did it right. They consulted experts from the Natural History Museum. They injected the specimen with 200 liters of formaldehyde.
The "new" shark is the one you see in the photos today. The original one? It’s gone.
The Palms Casino and the "New" Old Sharks
If you think there's only one Damien Hirst tiger shark, you're mistaken. Hirst realized early on that people love big fish in tanks.
There’s a piece called The Unknown (Explored, Explained, Exploded). It’s a shark sliced into three segments. For years, it was dated 1999. It sits in a bar at the Palms Casino Resort in Las Vegas.
But a 2024 investigation by The Guardian found that the shark was actually made in 2017.
✨ Don't miss: Is Steven Weber Leaving Chicago Med? What Really Happened With Dean Archer
Hirst’s company, Science Ltd, basically admitted that the dates on these works often refer to when the concept was born, not when the animal was actually pickled. It’s a bit of a "don't look behind the curtain" situation. To a collector paying millions, that date matters. To Hirst, it's all part of the performance.
Is It Even Art?
People still get angry about this piece. They say it’s just taxidermy. They say it’s cruel to the sharks. They say Hirst is a con artist.
Maybe.
But walk into a room with a 14-foot shark staring you down. You feel something. It’s visceral. You can't look at it and not think about your own heart stopping one day. That’s the "physical impossibility" Hirst was talking about. You know you're going to die, but you can't actually feel that reality until you're face-to-face with something that could have killed you.
It's expensive. It's pretentious. It's kinda gross.
But it’s also undeniably powerful.
Actionable Insights for Art Lovers and Skeptics
If you’re planning to dive deeper into the world of YBAs (Young British Artists) or Hirst’s "Natural History" series, keep these things in mind:
- Check the Dates: When looking at Hirst’s formaldehyde works, remember that the year in the title might be the "conception date," not the production date. If you're a collector, this is a huge distinction for valuation.
- Visit the Right Places: The Cohen shark (the 2006 replacement) is the most famous version and occasionally goes on loan to major museums like the Met or Tate. The "Unknown" shark is currently a permanent fixture at the Unknown Bar in the Palms, Las Vegas.
- Understand the Preservation: Modern formaldehyde art is much more stable than the 1991 version. If you see a "cloudy" tank, it’s usually a sign of poor maintenance or an older, failing preservation technique.
- Look Beyond the Shark: Hirst has done cows, sheep, and even a "bisected" mother and child (cows). The shark is just the entry point into a much larger conversation about how we commercialize the natural world.
The next time you see a photo of that shark, just remember: you're looking at a $12 million insurance policy on a concept that nature tried its best to rot away.