If you’ve spent any time in the military or hanging around the fringes of defense journalism, you’ve probably heard the name D. Earl Stephens. He isn't just some guy with a loud opinion on social media. He was the Managing Editor of Stars and Stripes, the legendary military newspaper that has served as the "hometown paper" for troops stationed across the globe since the Civil War.
But things got weird recently.
Stephens became the center of a massive digital storm when he started sounding the alarm about the potential transformation of Stars and Stripes into something it was never meant to be: state-run media. Honestly, the whole situation is a masterclass in how fragile the line is between independent reporting and government propaganda.
The Man Who Managed the Stripes
D. Earl Stephens didn't start at the top. He was a Navy man himself, serving a three-year stint before finding his way into the grinding, unglamorous world of local journalism. He spent years as a sportswriter in Florida—a "dream he never had," as he puts it—before climbing the ranks to lead one of the most unique publications in American history.
Stars and Stripes is a strange beast. It’s funded by the Pentagon but, by law, it has to be editorially independent. That’s a tough tightrope to walk.
Imagine your boss is the Secretary of Defense, but your job is to report on how that same boss’s policies might be failing the troops on the ground. That’s the environment Stephens lived in.
💡 You might also like: Michael Collins of Ireland: What Most People Get Wrong
D. Earl Stephens Stars and Stripes: The Independence Battle
The drama really kicked off when talk of "refocusing" the paper started circulating. Stephens didn't hold back. He took to platforms like Bluesky and X to blast the idea that the Pentagon should have any say in the editorial content.
"It’s MANDATED BY CONGRESS to be an editorially independent paper that reports ON the troops FOR the troops," Stephens has repeatedly emphasized.
His concern wasn't just about jobs. It was about the First Amendment inside the barracks. When he wrote his viral commentary "There is No Magical Way Out of This — There Will be Blood," he wasn't talking about a new movie. He was talking about the existential threat he felt the country, and the military's free press, was facing.
Some people called it hyperbole. Others called it a necessary wake-up call.
Why Stars and Stripes is Different
- Congressional Mandate: Since 1942, the paper has been protected from direct military censorship to ensure troops get the "straight scoop."
- Global Reach: It’s often the only physical newspaper available in remote forward operating bases.
- Civilian Leadership: Despite being a Department of Defense (DoD) entity, the editors are civilians like Stephens, specifically to keep the "chain of command" out of the newsroom.
The Viral Moment and the Backlash
Stephens’ rhetoric is... intense. Kinda blunt, actually.
📖 Related: Margaret Thatcher Explained: Why the Iron Lady Still Divides Us Today
He’s been a vocal critic of the Trump administration’s approach to the military and the press. This has made him a hero to some and a "partisan hack" to others. But if you look at his record at the paper, his focus was consistently on protecting the soldiers' right to know.
When the Pentagon suggested cutting the paper's funding a few years back, the outcry was bipartisan. Even John McCain was a staunch defender of the Stripes. The consensus was basically: if you take away their independent news, you're taking away their connection to the truth.
Stephens argued that if the paper becomes a mouthpiece for the administration—any administration—it loses its soul. You can't have a "free press" if the person you're reporting on is the one signing the checks and editing the headlines.
What Most People Get Wrong About the Controversy
A lot of folks think this is just a Twitter spat between a retired editor and some politicians. It’s bigger than that. It's about the First Amendment.
There's a misconception that because soldiers are in the military, they shouldn't have access to "critical" news. Stephens’ whole career at D. Earl Stephens Stars and Stripes was built on the opposite idea. He believed that the people who sacrifice the most for our democracy deserve the most transparent information about how that democracy is functioning.
👉 See also: Map of the election 2024: What Most People Get Wrong
He often references his time talking to Holocaust survivors and his deep study of history. For him, the "seeds of distrust" start when the media is co-opted. That’s why he uses such "stark and bold language," as critics have called it. He isn't trying to be polite. He’s trying to be a fire alarm.
Is the Independence Still Intact?
Right now, Stars and Stripes is still publishing. It’s still independent. But the pressure is constant.
Stephens’ departure and his subsequent transition into a fierce social commentator has left a void in the formal leadership of the paper, but his voice has arguably become louder since he left. He’s no longer bound by the neutrality required of a managing editor. He’s "unfiltered" now.
Whether you agree with his politics or not, his insight into how the DoD operates behind the scenes is invaluable. He knows where the bodies are buried, editorially speaking.
Taking Action: What You Can Do
The story of D. Earl Stephens and the fight for the Stripes isn't just for history buffs or military families. It’s a blueprint for why independent media matters. If you want to support the kind of work he stood for, here is how you can actually engage:
- Read the Stripes. Go to their website. See the kind of reporting they do. It’s often much more nuanced than what you see on cable news because it’s focused on the reality of the people on the front lines.
- Monitor Defense Budgeting. Funding for Stars and Stripes is often a line item that gets threatened. Keep an eye on how your representatives vote on military news independence.
- Follow the Independent Editors. Stephens isn't the only one. Look for journalists who have worked within the "MIL-media" space. They have a perspective you won't get from someone sitting in a studio in New York.
- Understand the Mandate. If you hear talk of "restructuring" military news, look for the phrase "editorial independence." If that phrase is missing, there's a problem.
Basically, keep your eyes open. Democracy doesn't just die in darkness; it dies when the people tasked with holding the flashlight are told where to point it. Stephens spent his career making sure the light hit the corners that the Pentagon wanted to keep hidden.
The best way to honor that legacy is to keep demanding the same level of transparency today. Stay informed, stay critical, and don't let the hometown paper of the troops become a pamphlet for the powerful.