You’ve probably seen the name Craig Irwin Roth MAGA floating around financial forums or social media recently, and honestly, it’s one of those instances where Wall Street and political theater collide in a pretty spectacular way. Craig Irwin, a Managing Director at ROTH Capital Partners (now ROTH MKM), isn't a politician. He’s a veteran equity research analyst who has spent decades covering clean energy and electric vehicles.
But things got weird—and loud—after the 2024 election.
For years, Irwin was one of the most vocal Tesla bears on the planet. He famously called the stock "egregiously overvalued" and kept a price target that looked like a typo compared to the market price. Then, the political landscape shifted. When Donald Trump won the presidency and Elon Musk became a central figure in the new administration, Irwin didn't just change his mind; he flipped the script entirely. This pivot is why the search term Craig Irwin Roth MAGA started trending, as investors tried to figure out if this was a genuine financial realization or a reaction to the new "MAGA-era" market dynamics.
The Bear Who Came In From the Cold
It’s hard to overstate how bearish Craig Irwin was on Tesla for a long time. While other analysts were tripping over themselves to raise targets, Irwin was the guy on CNBC pointing out that Tesla was just a car company being valued like a software miracle.
Basically, he wasn't buying the hype.
He held a price target as low as $85 when the stock was trading hundreds of dollars higher. His argument? Competition from legacy automakers was coming, and Tesla's margins would eventually get crushed. He wasn't wrong about the competition, but he missed the cultural and political juggernaut that Tesla was becoming.
Then came the "Red Wave."
Why the Post-Election Pivot Mattered
After the 2024 election, Irwin did something that made the industry do a double-take. He upgraded Tesla from "Neutral" to "Buy" and launched his price target into the stratosphere—raising it from $85 to $380, and eventually even higher. This wasn't just a slight adjustment. It was a total capitulation.
In his research notes, Irwin specifically pointed to the changed political environment. He mentioned a "beautiful red wave" and how the new administration’s policies—specifically those involving Elon Musk’s role in government efficiency—would act as massive catalysts for the stock.
- The Musk Factor: Musk’s proximity to the Trump administration changed the risk profile of the company.
- Regulatory Tailwinds: The idea that autonomous driving regulations might be streamlined at a federal level became a real possibility.
- Sentiment Shift: The "MAGA" connection turned Tesla from a "green energy" stock into a "patriotic growth" stock for a whole new segment of investors.
Craig Irwin Roth MAGA: More Than Just a Meme
When people search for Craig Irwin Roth MAGA, they are usually looking for the crossover between his financial analysis and the political movement. Honestly, it’s a masterclass in how "Macro" factors (the big stuff like government and policy) can completely override "Micro" factors (like how many cars a factory makes in a week).
🔗 Read more: Why We’re Not Going Back to the Old Way of Working
Irwin’s shift reflects a broader trend in 2025 and 2026 where analysts have had to rethink their models based on political influence. If you're looking at Tesla today through the lens of a traditional 2019 analyst, you're going to lose money. You have to look at it through the lens of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) and the deregulation era.
He even joked in a research update about a "shiny gold T" on every car. That kind of language is a far cry from the buttoned-up, skeptical Irwin of three years ago.
What Most People Get Wrong About the Shift
A lot of critics say Irwin just "sold out" or followed the trend. That’s a bit of a simplification.
Analysts at firms like ROTH are paid to be right about where a stock is going, not to be "consistent" for the sake of their ego. If the fundamental reality of a company changes because the CEO is now the right-hand man to the President of the United States, an analyst who doesn't change their rating is actually the one failing at their job.
Irwin acknowledged the "tug of war" for the EV maker but argued that if the new administration's goals for the economy succeed, it lifts all boats—especially the one steered by Elon Musk. It’s less about a personal political shift and more about a clinical assessment of power.
🔗 Read more: Are Grocery Prices Coming Down? What the Data Actually Says About Your Weekly Receipt
Reality Check: The Risks Still Exist
Even with the pivot, it's not all sunshine and gold "T" logos. Irwin and other analysts have noted that shifting global trade policies could still put pressure on deliveries. China remains a massive wildcard. If trade wars heat up, Tesla’s Shanghai factory—their crown jewel—could become a liability.
Also, the "MAGA" association is a double-edged sword. It brings in one group of buyers but can alienate the traditional "Eco-conscious" buyer who originally fueled Tesla’s rise. Irwin seems to be betting that the growth in robotaxis and the "CyberCab" will outweigh any lost sales from the suburban "Green" demographic.
Actionable Insights for Investors
If you're following the Craig Irwin Roth MAGA saga to inform your own portfolio, here’s the bottom line.
First, stop looking at Tesla as just a car company; the market clearly doesn't see it that way anymore. Second, watch the regulatory space—if the federal government moves toward a unified autonomous driving standard, that’s the "catalyst" Irwin is banking on.
Lastly, pay attention to the 2026 milestones. Irwin has specifically cited the volume production of the Tesla Semi and the Optimus V3 robot as the next big tests. If those slip, even the friendliest political environment won't save the valuation.
Keep a close eye on the ROTH MKM research updates. Irwin has proven he's willing to pivot when the facts change, and in a market this volatile, that flexibility is actually more valuable than stubbornness.