Corruption in the LAPD: What Most People Get Wrong About the History of Scandals

Corruption in the LAPD: What Most People Get Wrong About the History of Scandals

Los Angeles is a city built on myths. We see it in the movies, the neon lights, and the palm trees, but there is a darker reality that locals have lived with for over a century. When people talk about corruption in the LAPD, they usually think of Denzel Washington in Training Day or maybe a vague memory of the O.J. Simpson trial. It’s deeper than that. Much deeper.

Trust is a fragile thing. In LA, it’s been shattered and glued back together so many times you can barely see the original shape.

If you want to understand why a routine traffic stop in Echo Park feels like a high-stakes standoff, you have to look at the bones of the department. We aren't just talking about a few "bad apples" taking a bribe here and there. We are talking about systemic, institutionalized behavior that has triggered riots, changed federal laws, and cost taxpayers billions of dollars in settlements. Honestly, it’s a lot to wrap your head around.

The Rampart Scandal was a Turning Point

Most people think they know Rampart. They don't.

In the late 1990s, the CRASH (Community Resources Against Street Hoodlums) unit was supposed to be the elite answer to gang violence. Instead, it became a gang itself. Rafael Pérez, an officer caught stealing six pounds of cocaine from an evidence locker, eventually flipped. What he told investigators sounded like a fever dream. He described a culture where officers routinely framed innocent people, planted "drop guns" to justify shootings, and beat suspects until they were unrecognizable.

One of the most harrowing stories involves Javier Ovando. He was an unarmed 19-year-old when Pérez and his partner, Nino Durden, shot him and then planted a gun on his paralyzed body. Ovando was sentenced to 23 years in prison based on their lies. He served three before the truth came out.

This wasn't just a mistake. It was a lifestyle. Officers in the Rampart Division had their own tattoos and celebrated "hits." When the dust settled, over 100 convictions were overturned. The city paid out roughly $125 million. But the real cost was the absolute death of public trust in the Rampart area.

Why Does It Keep Happening?

You’d think after Rampart, things would change. Why didn't they?

Basically, it comes down to oversight—or the lack of it. For decades, the LAPD operated as a kingdom unto itself. Under Chief William Parker in the 1950s, the department became "professionalized," which sounds good on paper. It meant they were insulated from City Hall politics. But that insulation turned into a shield against any kind of accountability.

✨ Don't miss: Franklin D Roosevelt Civil Rights Record: Why It Is Way More Complicated Than You Think

The "Thin Blue Line" isn't just a bumper sticker in Los Angeles; it’s a code of silence. If you speak up, you’re a pariah.

Take the case of Christopher Dorner in 2013. While his violent rampage was indefensible and horrific, his manifesto touched a raw nerve for many because it detailed the retaliation he faced for reporting a fellow officer for kicking a mentally ill man. Whether his specific claims were 100% accurate or not, the narrative resonated because so many other officers had shared similar stories of being pushed out for being "snitches."

The federal government eventually had to step in. That’s how bad corruption in the LAPD got.

In 2001, the U.S. Department of Justice imposed a "Consent Decree." This is basically a federal court order that forced the LAPD to modernize its tracking of officer use of force and how complaints were handled. It stayed in place for over a decade. Did it work? Sorta.

It made the paperwork better. It made the data clearer. But it’s hard to legislate what’s happening in a patrol car at 3:00 AM on a Tuesday.

Modern Issues: From Ghost Guns to Gangs Within

If you think this is all ancient history, you haven't been paying attention to the news lately. The faces change, but the headlines stay weirdly similar.

Recently, the department has struggled with scandals involving the theft of firearms from the LAPD academy and the rise of "ghost guns" being circulated by people who should be off the streets. There’s also the ongoing issue of the "Centurion" and other secret societies. While the "Deputy Gangs" are more notoriously associated with the LA County Sheriff’s Department (LASD), the LAPD has had its own share of specialized units that developed a "warrior" subculture that views the public as the enemy.

Last year, the city was rocked by the "LAPD photo scandal," where photos of a commander’s private life were allegedly leaked as part of an internal power struggle. It feels like high school drama, but with guns and badges.

🔗 Read more: 39 Carl St and Kevin Lau: What Actually Happened at the Cole Valley Property

The Budget Reality

Los Angeles spends a massive chunk of its general fund on the police. We’re talking billions.

When corruption in the LAPD leads to lawsuits, that money doesn't come out of the police budget. It comes from the city's general fund. That’s money that could have paved streets, built parks, or funded homeless services. Every time an officer plants evidence or uses excessive force, the taxpayers of Los Angeles are the ones who write the check.

Since 2020, the push for "transparency" has led to body cameras being mandatory. This has been a game-changer, but it’s not a silver bullet. We’ve seen cases where officers turn off the cameras or where the footage "mysteriously" disappears. It’s a constant cat-and-mouse game between the public’s right to know and the department’s instinct to protect its own.

The Complicated Role of the Police Commission

The Board of Police Commissioners is supposed to be the civilian watchdog. They are five civilians appointed by the Mayor.

They’re busy. They have to review every single officer-involved shooting.

Critics say they are too close to the Chief. Supporters say they are the only thing standing between the city and total chaos. Honestly, both can be true at the same time. The Commission has pushed for major reforms in how the LAPD handles mental health crises, moving toward sending social workers instead of armed officers. That’s progress. But when a major scandal hits, the Commission often seems two steps behind the investigative reporters at the LA Times.

What the Public Gets Wrong

There’s a common misconception that corruption is always about money. In the LAPD, it’s often about power and "results."

In the 70s and 80s, the "Daryl Gates era" focused on an aggressive, paramilitary style of policing. Success was measured by arrests and "clearing the streets." When you tell a group of young, aggressive officers that the ends justify the means, you are practically inviting them to cut corners.

💡 You might also like: Effingham County Jail Bookings 72 Hours: What Really Happened

You get "testilying"—the practice of lying in court to make a bust stick. You get illegal searches because "everyone knows he’s a drug dealer anyway."

This culture is incredibly hard to root out because it’s often passed down from field training officers to rookies. "Forget what they taught you in the academy," the old saying goes. "I'll show you how it really works."

Fixing corruption in the LAPD isn't about a single policy change. It's about changing the DNA of the organization.

If you live in Los Angeles or are just visiting, it’s important to know your rights and understand the landscape. This isn't about being "anti-police." It's about demanding a standard of professional conduct that the city deserves.

There are several things you can do to stay informed and protect your community:

  • Watch the Police Commission Meetings: They are public. You can literally show up or Zoom in and see how decisions are made. It's often boring, but that's where the real work happens.
  • Support Independent Oversight: Groups like the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) need public backing to remain truly independent.
  • Know Your 4th Amendment Rights: Understanding what constitutes a legal search and seizure is your best defense against individual misconduct.
  • Follow Local Investigative Journalism: Outlets like the LAist and the LA Times do the heavy lifting that uncovers these scandals in the first place.

The history of Los Angeles is inseparable from the history of its police. From the 1992 Uprisings to the 2020 protests, the street has always been the place where these tensions boil over. The goal for the future isn't just fewer scandals; it's a department that doesn't feel the need to hide from the people it serves.

Real change is slow. It’s messy. It’s often frustratingly incremental. But by staying informed and holding leadership accountable, the cycle of corruption can be broken. It has to be. The city's future depends on it.

To engage more deeply with this issue, start by reviewing the latest reports from the LAPD Board of Police Commissioners. These documents detail current use-of-force statistics and internal disciplinary actions, providing a transparent look at how the department is performing today versus the scandals of the past. Additionally, familiarize yourself with the California Public Records Act (CPRA), which allows you to request specific records regarding officer misconduct, ensuring that the "code of silence" is replaced by public accountability.