You’ve probably heard someone at a dinner party or on a heated social media thread claim that the U.S. has always had a two-term limit for presidents. Honestly, that’s just not true. For about 150 years, the "limit" was basically just a gentleman's agreement started by George Washington. He was tired, he wanted to go back to Mount Vernon, and he didn't want the office to look like a monarchy. So, he walked away after eight years.
Then came Franklin D. Roosevelt.
FDR didn’t just break the tradition; he shattered it by winning four consecutive elections. It took a global depression and a World War for the American public to decide that maybe one guy in the White House for sixteen years was a bit much. That’s why we ended up with the constitutional amendment presidential term limit we know today—the 22nd Amendment.
The 22nd Amendment Explained (Simply)
Ratified in 1951, the 22nd Amendment is the actual legal wall that stops a president from being "President for Life." It’s actually pretty short, but it has some weird nuances that people trip over all the time.
The core rule: You cannot be elected president more than twice. Period.
But there’s a loophole-ish clause for Vice Presidents. If a VP takes over because the president dies or resigns, and they serve more than two years of that remaining term, they can only be elected for one more full term of their own. If they serve less than two years, they can still run twice. Technically, this means a person could serve a maximum of ten years in the Oval Office.
🔗 Read more: Recent Obituaries in Charlottesville VA: What Most People Get Wrong
Why the Debate Is Heating Up in 2026
We are currently seeing a lot of chatter about this again. Just this month, in January 2026, Representative Andy Ogles and other allies have floated the idea of a new constitutional amendment presidential term limit that would allow for three terms instead of two.
It’s not just a random "what if" anymore. House Joint Resolution 29 (H.J.Res.29) was introduced specifically to revise the 22nd Amendment. The argument from supporters? They claim certain leaders—specifically citing Donald Trump in his second term—need more time to "finish the job."
Critics, on the other hand, are terrified. They argue that once you move the goalposts from two terms to three, you’re on a slippery slope toward ending term limits altogether. We’ve seen this happen in other countries. In 2020, Russia reset Vladimir Putin’s term count. El Salvador just moved to abolish limits. For many, the two-term cap is the only thing keeping the U.S. from sliding into an autocracy.
The "Lame Duck" Problem
One of the biggest real-world headaches caused by the constitutional amendment presidential term limit is the "lame duck" effect.
As soon as a president enters their second term, everyone knows they’re leaving. Influence starts to leak out of the White House like a punctured tire. Foreign leaders start waiting for the next person. Congress starts playing "wait and see."
💡 You might also like: Trump New Gun Laws: What Most People Get Wrong
Some political scientists, like the late Juan Linz, argued that these rigid limits can actually make presidential systems less stable. If a leader is popular but legally barred from running, it can create a massive vacuum or even tempt the leader to break the law to stay in power.
Can the 22nd Amendment Actually Be Repealed?
Changing the Constitution is incredibly hard. It’s supposed to be.
To change the constitutional amendment presidential term limit, you’d need:
- A two-thirds vote in both the House and the Senate.
- Ratification by three-fourths of the states (that’s 38 states).
In today's hyper-polarized climate, getting 38 states to agree on what color the sky is feels impossible, let alone changing the rules for who gets to lead the country. While there are active resolutions in the 119th Congress right now, the math for them to actually pass is a very steep uphill climb.
What Most People Miss: The Vice President Loophole
There is a long-standing legal debate that sounds like a plot from a political thriller. Could a two-term president be elected as Vice President and then "succeed" to the presidency if the president resigns?
📖 Related: Why Every Tornado Warning MN Now Live Alert Demands Your Immediate Attention
The 12th Amendment says no person "constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President."
But legal scholars like Scott Gant and Bruce Peabody have argued for years that the 22nd Amendment only says you can't be elected to a third term—it doesn't explicitly say you can't serve one if you get there via succession. It’s a messy, untested gray area that would almost certainly end up at the Supreme Court.
Actionable Steps for Staying Informed
If you want to keep track of where this is going, don't just watch the headlines.
- Monitor Congress.gov: Look specifically for H.J.Res.29 or similar "Joint Resolutions" to see if they move out of the Judiciary Committee.
- Watch the State Legislatures: If a proposal ever passes Congress, the real battle moves to state capitals. This is where your local vote actually carries the most weight in a constitutional fight.
- Read the Federalist Papers (specifically No. 69 and 71): Alexander Hamilton actually argued against term limits. Knowing his arguments helps you understand the DNA of the office.
The bottom line is that the constitutional amendment presidential term limit isn't just some dusty old rule. It’s a living part of the power struggle in Washington. Whether it stays, goes, or gets tweaked to three terms will likely be the biggest constitutional debate of the next few years.