You’ve probably heard the "two-term rule" mentioned a thousand times during election cycles. It sounds simple. You get eight years, then you pack your bags and move to a library or start a podcast. But honestly, the constitution on president terms is way more nuanced—and historically messier—than a basic "two and you're through" policy.
For the first 150 years of the United States, there wasn't actually a law stopping a president from running forever. Seriously. If George Washington had wanted to stay until he passed away, he legally could have.
The Ghost of George Washington
The whole idea of a two-term limit started as a vibe, not a law. Washington was exhausted by 1796. He’d led the Continental Army, presided over the Constitutional Convention, and served eight years as the first president. He just wanted to go back to Mount Vernon. By stepping down, he set a "precedent"—a fancy word for a tradition that everyone followed because they didn't want to look like a power-hungry monarch.
Thomas Jefferson followed suit, mostly because he was terrified that if presidents stayed too long, the office would basically turn into an elective monarchy. He argued that the "re-eligibility" of the president would lead to a life-tenure situation. For over a century, this unwritten rule was the gold standard.
Why FDR Changed Everything
Then came Franklin D. Roosevelt. In 1940, the world was on fire. World War II was tearing Europe apart, and the U.S. was still shaking off the Great Depression. FDR decided that the middle of a global catastrophe was no time to swap leaders. He ran for a third term. Then a fourth.
He won both.
While many Americans loved him, the political establishment—specifically the Republicans who had been locked out of the White House for over a decade—was spooked. They saw the "tradition" of Washington crumbling. After FDR died in 1945, just months into his fourth term, Congress decided they needed to put it in writing.
✨ Don't miss: Olmsted County Warrant List: What Most People Get Wrong
Breaking Down the 22nd Amendment
The 22nd Amendment was ratified in 1951. It’s the literal text of the constitution on president terms today. But if you read the fine print, there are some weird loopholes.
The amendment says: "No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice."
But what if you weren't "elected"?
Consider this scenario: A Vice President takes over because the President dies. If that VP serves less than two years of the former President's term, they can still be elected to two full terms of their own. That means a person could technically serve as President for up to 10 years.
✨ Don't miss: The Salvadoran Civil War: What People Often Get Wrong About the 12-Year Conflict
However, if that VP serves more than two years of the original term, they are only eligible to be elected once more. It’s a math game that Lyndon B. Johnson had to play. Since he took over for JFK with only about 14 months left in the term, he could have legally run in 1964 and 1968. He chose not to in '68, but the law allowed it.
The "Loophole" Everyone Debates
Here is where things get kinda wild. Some legal scholars, like Bruce Peabody and Scott Gant, have pointed out a potential "backdoor" in the 22nd Amendment.
The law says you can't be elected president more than twice. It doesn't explicitly say a two-term president can't serve as president again if they get there through the line of succession.
Could a former two-term president be Vice President?
The 12th Amendment says that "no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President."
So, if you can't be elected president, are you "constitutionally ineligible" for the office itself? It’s a massive legal gray area. Most experts think the Supreme Court would shut it down immediately to preserve the spirit of the law, but the text is surprisingly slippery.
📖 Related: Japan Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi: What Most People Get Wrong
Global Perspective: How Others Do It
The U.S. is actually pretty strict. Take a look at how other countries handle their leaders:
- France: They used to have 7-year terms (the septennat). Now it's 5 years, and you can only serve two consecutive terms.
- Mexico: They have the "Sexenio"—one single 6-year term. No re-election, ever. It’s a hard "one and done."
- Azerbaijan & Belarus: They removed their term limits entirely.
- Switzerland: They have a revolving presidency where the head of state changes every single year among a seven-member council.
Does the 22nd Amendment Hurt Democracy?
There’s a lot of talk about repealing the 22nd Amendment. Ronald Reagan actually hated it toward the end of his second term. He thought it was undemocratic because it stopped the people from voting for who they actually wanted.
The argument is that "lame duck" presidents—those in their second term who can’t run again—lose their political influence. People stop listening to them because they know they’re leaving.
On the flip side, supporters argue that term limits are the only thing standing between a democracy and a "strongman" who uses the powers of the office to stay in power forever. Without the constitution on president terms being set in stone, many fear the incumbency advantage would be impossible to overcome.
What You Should Do Next
Understanding the rules of the game is the first step in being an informed voter. If you're interested in how executive power works, here’s how to dig deeper:
- Read the 22nd Amendment: Don't take a pundit's word for it. Look up the literal text on the National Archives website. It’s short—less than 200 words.
- Research the "Lame Duck" Period: Look at the final two years of the last three two-term presidents (Clinton, Bush, Obama). Notice how their legislative productivity usually drops.
- Explore the 25th Amendment: This handles what happens if a president is disabled or unfit. It works in tandem with the 22nd to define how power is handed off.
- Check Local Term Limits: Many governors and mayors have different rules. Comparing your state’s rules to the federal ones can give you a better sense of how "term limit culture" varies across the U.S.
The law isn't just a set of dry instructions; it's a reflection of our fear of kings and our desire for fresh leadership. Whether you think eight years is too short or just right, it’s the framework that keeps the gears of the White House turning.
Summary Table of Presidential Term Rules
| Scenario | Can They Run Again? | Total Possible Years |
|---|---|---|
| Elected twice to full terms | No | 8 years |
| VP takes over with < 2 years left | Yes (twice) | Up to 10 years |
| VP takes over with > 2 years left | Yes (once) | Up to 6 years |
| Former 2-term President as VP | Legally disputed | Unknown |
Ultimately, the constitution on president terms serves as a guardrail. It ensures that no matter how popular—or powerful—a leader becomes, the office belongs to the people, and the people eventually get a fresh start.
Actionable Insight: If you feel the current 8-year limit is too restrictive or too long, your only path for change is a new Constitutional Amendment. This requires a two-thirds vote in both the House and Senate, or a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of State Legislatures. It's designed to be hard to change for a reason.