Walk into any high-end design firm in London or New York and mention the words "Comic Sans." You’ll probably see a physical flinch. It is the only font in history to inspire its own hate-fueled movement. There is a whole website called Ban Comic Sans. People have written manifestos about it. Honestly, it’s just a typeface, right? It’s a series of digital instructions for how to display the letter "A." But in the world of typography, it has become the ultimate shorthand for "I don't know what I'm doing."
The hatred is real. It’s visceral.
The funny thing is, most of the people who claim to despise it can’t actually explain why. They just know they’re supposed to hate it because the internet told them to back in 1999. But if we’re going to understand why do people hate comic sans, we have to go back to a very specific office in Albuquerque, New Mexico, in the mid-90s. We have to look at a failed digital dog named Rover.
The Microsoft Bob Incident
Vincent Connare is the man you should either thank or blame. In 1994, he was a type designer at Microsoft. He was looking at a beta version of a program called Microsoft Bob, which was designed to make computers more "user-friendly" for kids and novices. The interface was a cartoon house. There was a dog named Rover who talked to you via speech bubbles.
But there was a problem. The text in the speech bubbles was set in Times New Roman.
💡 You might also like: m1 abrams tank remote control: What Most People Get Wrong
Connare thought that looked ridiculous. Who puts a formal, serifed font—the kind used for New York Times editorials—inside a cartoon dog’s speech bubble? It was a massive "clash of personality." He opened up his copy of The Dark Knight Returns and Watchmen, looked at the hand-lettered text, and started drawing. He wasn't trying to win design awards. He was trying to solve a specific problem: making a digital dog look like he was actually talking.
He finished the font, but it was too late to get it into Microsoft Bob. Instead, it was bundled into the Windows 95 Plus! Pack. Suddenly, millions of people had access to a font that looked like a comic book. And they used it for everything.
Everything.
That is where the trouble started.
Context is King (and Comic Sans is the Court Jester)
The primary reason why do people hate comic sans isn't the design of the letters themselves. It’s the context. Imagine showing up to a funeral in a bright yellow clown suit. There’s nothing inherently "evil" about a yellow suit, but it is deeply inappropriate for the setting.
By the late 90s, Comic Sans was being used for:
- Hospital signs about serious illnesses.
- Eviction notices.
- Resumes.
- Warning labels on heavy machinery.
- The announcement of the discovery of the Higgs Boson (seriously, CERN did this in 2012).
When a font designed for a cartoon dog is used to tell you that your grandmother has a terminal illness, it feels mocking. It feels flippant. This "tonal dissonance" is what drives designers crazy. Design is about communication, and when the visual style contradicts the message, the communication fails.
🔗 Read more: The S-70 Okhotnik-B: Why the S-70UAS U-Hawk is Russia’s Most Controversial Stealth Bet
The Technical Argument: Why Designers Actually Cringe
If you ask a professional typographer why they hate it, they’ll give you a more technical answer. They’ll talk about kerning. Kerning is the space between individual letters. In Comic Sans, the kerning is... messy. Some letters are bunched up; others have massive gaps between them.
Then there’s the weight. The strokes are inconsistent. It’s "wonky" in a way that doesn't feel intentional or artistic. It feels like a mistake.
Compare it to something like Helvetica. Helvetica is invisible. It gets out of the way. Comic Sans demands your attention, but it does so like a toddler screaming in a grocery store. It’s loud, it’s distracting, and it takes up way more horizontal space than most fonts, making it inefficient for long-form reading.
The Great Irony: Comic Sans is Actually Great for Some People
Here is the part where I might lose some of the purists. Comic Sans is actually one of the most functional fonts ever created for a specific group of people: those with dyslexia.
Because the letters are so irregular and "clunky," they are easier for the brain to distinguish. In a standard font like Arial, a "b" is often just a flipped "d." To a dyslexic brain, that’s confusing. In Comic Sans, the shapes are distinct. The "p," "q," "b," and "d" all have unique weights and angles. Organizations like the British Dyslexia Association have actually recommended its use for years.
🔗 Read more: How 15 Divided by 2.5 Actually Works and Why It Trips People Up
So, while the design snobs are laughing at it, a significant portion of the population is using it as a vital accessibility tool. It’s hard to call a font "garbage" when it helps people read.
The Social Signaling of Hating Things
Let's be honest for a second. A lot of the hate is just social signaling.
Hating Comic Sans is a way of saying, "I have good taste." It’s an entry-level gatekeeping mechanism for the creative world. If you know that Comic Sans is bad, you’re part of the "in-group." You’re one of the people who understands design.
It’s the same reason people hate Nickelback or Hawaiian pizza. It becomes a meme. It becomes a shortcut for an identity. Most people who tweet about how much they hate the font probably haven't even thought about it in years—they just know it’s the "correct" opinion to have in a professional setting.
The Comic Sans Renaissance?
Strangely enough, we are starting to see a bit of a shift. Generation Z, which grew up with the internet already being a "done" thing, doesn't have the same baggage. To them, Comic Sans is "retro." It’s "ironic." It’s "camp."
We are seeing it pop up in "ugly-cool" fashion branding and niche zines. It’s a rebellion against the sterile, minimalist "Millennial Aesthetic" where everything has to be sans-serif, white, and perfectly balanced. Sometimes, people just want things to look human and messy.
Actionable Insights for Using (or Avoiding) It
If you’re a business owner or a creator, you probably shouldn't use Comic Sans for your logo. Not because it’s "ugly," but because the baggage is too heavy. You can't control the audience's reaction, and the reaction is usually going to be "this looks unprofessional."
However, you can learn from it:
- Match Tone to Intent: If you’re writing a serious report, use a serious font (Garamond, Baskerville). If you’re making a flyer for a kid's birthday party, feel free to use something whimsical—maybe just choose something like Comic Neue, which is a refined, actually-well-designed version of Comic Sans.
- Think About Accessibility: If you’re creating content for a wide audience, consider fonts like Lexie Readable or OpenDyslexic. They provide the same benefits as Comic Sans without the social stigma.
- Don't Be a Snob: Recognize that design is a tool. If a teacher uses Comic Sans because it helps their students learn, that is "good design," regardless of how the kerning looks to a professional.
Ultimately, Comic Sans isn't going anywhere. It’s pre-installed on billions of devices. It’s the font of the people. It’s the font of the garage sale sign and the church bake-off. It’s awkward, it’s ugly, and it’s perfectly human.
If you really want to level up your typography game, start looking into variable fonts. They allow you to adjust weight and width on the fly, giving you the personality of a hand-drawn font with the technical precision of a high-end typeface. Check out Google Fonts’ variable section to see how font technology has moved way beyond the 1994 Microsoft Bob era. Stop worrying about the "hated" fonts and start focusing on how your text actually reads on different screen sizes. That’s where the real design work happens today.