Stop thinking of ChatGPT as a calculator. Seriously. If you’re treat it like a search engine or a rigid tool that outputs "the answer," you're basically using a Ferrari to go to the mailbox. It’s a collaborator. A messy, brilliant, occasionally hallucinating intern that never sleeps. This shift in perspective—moving from "user" to "partner"—is the heart of co intelligence living and working with ai.
Ethan Mollick, a professor at Wharton who has become the de facto voice on this stuff, calls it the "Jagged Frontier." It’s a weird concept. Basically, there are tasks AI is god-tier at (like brainstorming marketing slogans) and tasks it's surprisingly bad at (like basic math or certain types of logical reasoning), and the line between them isn't straight. It’s jagged. One minute you’re flying; the next, you’ve hit a wall.
The Myth of the "Magic Button"
Most people approach AI with a specific, narrow expectation. They want a button that does their job. But co intelligence living and working with ai isn't about replacement; it's about integration. Think of it like a centaur. In chess, "Centaur Play" is when a human and a computer work together. The human brings the intuition and the long-term strategy, while the computer handles the brute-force calculation and pattern recognition. Together, they beat any solo human and, more interestingly, they often beat any solo computer.
That’s how you have to live now.
I talked to a developer last week who uses AI to write about 40% of his boilerplate code. He’s not worried about his job. Why? Because the AI writes the code, but he’s the one who understands why the code needs to exist in the first place. He’s the architect. The AI is the power tool. If the power tool slips and cuts the wrong board, the architect is there to see it.
The problem is that many people are letting the AI drive while they take a nap in the back seat. That’s not co-intelligence. That’s just being a bad supervisor. You have to stay "in the loop." If you aren't checking the output, you aren't working with AI—you're just gambling with your reputation.
Why Your Prompts Are Probably Bad (And How to Fix Them)
Let’s be honest. "Write a blog post about dogs" is a terrible prompt. It’s lazy. It gives the AI zero context, so it gives you back generic, lukewarm garbage.
✨ Don't miss: How to install siri on iphone: What most people get wrong
To really master co intelligence living and working with ai, you have to treat the LLM (Large Language Model) like a person who is incredibly smart but has absolutely no context about your life. You need to provide the "Who, What, and Why."
- Who are you? Tell the AI it's a senior editor at a major tech publication.
- What is the goal? Don't just say "write." Say "Argue against the common wisdom that AI will lead to a 4-day work week."
- What is the tone? Tell it to be "cynical but helpful."
Better yet, use few-shot prompting. Give it three examples of how you write. Say, "Here are three emails I’ve written. Now, write a response to this client in my specific voice." Suddenly, the output isn't "AI-sounding" anymore. It’s yours, just faster.
The Latent Space is Not a Database
People think AI "looks things up." It doesn't. It predicts the next token. It’s a statistical miracle. When you ask it a question, it isn't browsing a library; it’s navigating a multi-dimensional map of human thought called latent space.
This is why hallucinations happen. The AI isn't "lying"—it's just following a statistical path that doesn't happen to align with reality. In a co-intelligent framework, you use AI for the structure and the ideation, but you bring your own facts. If you need a list of historical dates, go to Britannica or a trusted source. If you need to understand the thematic connections between two disparate historical events, ask the AI.
Living With the Machine: It’s Not Just Work
We talk a lot about productivity, but what about life?
Co-intelligence is creeping into our kitchens and living rooms. I know a guy who uses AI to plan his family's weekly meals based on what’s actually in his fridge. He takes a photo of the shelves, uploads it, and asks for three recipes that take under 20 minutes. That’s a massive cognitive load lifted. It’s not just "using an app." It’s a collaborative relationship where the AI handles the logistics and he handles the cooking.
There is a psychological component here, too. We are starting to outsource our "memory" to these systems. This isn't entirely new—we did it with Google, and before that, we did it with books—but the intimacy is different now. We are talking to our tools.
The Ethical Side of the Desk
We can't talk about co intelligence living and working with ai without mentioning the elephant in the room: copyright and bias. These models were trained on the collective output of humanity, often without permission.
Does that mean we shouldn't use them? Not necessarily. But it means we have a responsibility to be ethical co-pilots. If you’re a designer, using AI to generate a mood board is a great use of co-intelligence. Using it to rip off a specific living artist’s style to avoid paying them? That’s just theft.
Nuance matters.
We also have to deal with the "bias in, bias out" problem. If the training data is biased (and it is), the AI will reflect that. A co-intelligent worker is always looking for those blind spots. If the AI suggests only male candidates for a simulated hiring task, you have to be the one to catch it and correct the course.
The Skills That Actually Matter Now
In a world where AI can write "good enough" prose and code, what do you bring to the table?
It’s not speed. You’ll never be faster than the machine.
✨ Don't miss: The Wizard of Oz Trick: Why Your AI Favorite App Might Just Be a Person in a Basement
It’s judgment.
The most valuable skill in 2026 isn't "prompt engineering"—that's a transitory skill that will eventually be automated away. The real skill is "problem decomposition." It's the ability to take a massive, messy project and break it down into small, logical pieces that an AI can help you solve.
You also need high emotional intelligence (EQ). AI can simulate empathy, but it doesn't actually care. In a business meeting, the AI can transcribe the notes and suggest action items, but it can't feel the tension in the room or notice that the CEO is hesitant about a specific proposal. You have to do that.
- Critical Thinking: Don't take the first output. Challenge the AI. Ask it for a counter-argument to its own point.
- Verification: Treat every fact like a rumor until you see the source.
- Curiosity: Experiment. The people who are winning right now are the ones who spend 30 minutes a day just "playing" with new models to see what they can do.
Transforming the Workflow
Let’s look at a real-world example of co intelligence living and working with ai in a marketing agency.
Traditionally, a campaign might take three weeks. You’d have a kickoff, a week of research, three days of brainstorming, and then a week of production. With a co-intelligent approach, that timeline shrinks, but the roles shift.
The researcher uses AI to summarize 50 industry reports in an afternoon. The creative director uses an image generator to create 20 different "vibes" for the campaign in an hour, rather than waiting days for sketches. The copywriter uses an LLM to generate 50 headlines, then picks the best three and polishes them into something truly human.
The output is better because you spent your energy on choosing rather than drudging.
The Future is a Two-Way Street
Eventually, the "living with" part of this will get even weirder. We’re moving toward "Agents"—AI that doesn't just talk, but does. Imagine an AI that has permission to access your email, your calendar, and your bank account. You tell it, "I want to go to Japan in October for under $3,000," and it just... handles it. It negotiates the flights, books the hotels, and adds the itinerary to your phone.
That requires a massive amount of trust.
📖 Related: The Radius of a Nuclear Weapon: Why Blast Maps Usually Get the Math Wrong
This is where the "living" part of co intelligence living and working with ai gets real. We are going to have to decide how much of our agency we are willing to trade for convenience. If the AI chooses your vacation, is it still your vacation? If it writes your anniversary card, does the sentiment still count?
These aren't tech questions. They’re human questions.
Actionable Steps for the "Co-Intelligent" Life
If you want to stop being a spectator and start being a collaborator, do these things tomorrow:
- Stop "Searching" and Start "Conversing": Instead of asking "How do I make a pivot table?", upload your data (anonymized, please!) and say, "I'm trying to find the trend in Q3 sales versus Q2. Can you help me look at this from a few different angles?"
- The "Three-Draft" Rule: Never use the first thing the AI gives you. Ask it to rewrite it for a different audience, then ask it to find flaws in its own logic. Finally, take the best parts and write the final version yourself.
- Audit Your Tasks: List everything you do in a week. Mark the things that feel like "robotic" work—data entry, summarizing meetings, formatting. Give those to the AI. Reclaim that time for the "human" work—strategy, relationship building, and deep thinking.
- Stay Informed but Skeptical: Follow people like Andrej Karpathy or Margaret Mitchell. One will show you the "how," and the other will remind you of the "should."
- Use AI for Learning, Not Just Doing: If you don't understand a concept, ask the AI to "Explain this like I'm a golden retriever" or "Give me a Socratic dialogue that teaches me the basics of quantum entanglement." This is the greatest personal tutor in history. Use it.
We are in the middle of a massive shift in how the world works. It’s scary, sure. But it’s also the first time in history we’ve had a tool that can talk back. Don't just use it. Work with it.
The goal isn't to be a better "user" of AI. It’s to be a better, more capable version of yourself because of it. That is the essence of co intelligence living and working with ai. It’s not about the machine getting smarter—it’s about the partnership getting stronger.