Firaxis just blew up the foundation of how we play Civilization. Seriously. For decades, if you picked Montezuma, you were playing the Aztecs. If you picked Gandhi, you were India. That’s dead now. In Civilization VII, the devs decided to decouple leaders from civilizations entirely. It’s a massive gamble. Some fans are losing their minds over the historical "inaccuracy," while others are busy theory-crafting the most broken combos imaginable.
If you're looking for Civ 7 all leaders info, you have to understand that a "leader" isn't a package deal anymore. They are independent agents. You can take Augustus Caesar and lead the Aksumites. You could take Amina and lead through the Age of Exploration as a totally different culture. It’s wild. This shift changes the entire SEO of your strategy. You aren't just picking a color on the map; you're picking a set of permanent attributes that will follow you through three distinct historical ages.
💡 You might also like: Civ 6 Player Count: Why Most People Are Still Choosing the 2016 Classic
Who Are the Faces of the New Era?
The roster for Civilization VII is a mix of the usual suspects and some deep cuts that haven't seen the light of day in a Triple-A 4X game before.
Augustus is back, obviously. You can’t have a Civ game without the Romans, but here he’s focused heavily on "Capital Support." His unique ability, Curator Civitatis, makes it so that whenever you complete a building in your Capital, you get a boost to Culture. It's very tall-play oriented. Then you have someone like Amina, the Queen of Zazzau. She’s a powerhouse for trade and expansion. Her Zaria’s Wall ability gives her extra combat strength for units in desert tiles and boosts Gold from trade routes.
Then there’s the philosophy shift. Firaxis, led by Ed Beach, wanted to represent leaders who weren't just "heads of state" in the traditional sense. That's why we have Benjamin Franklin. He’s not a King. He wasn't a President. But his influence on the American "Civ" identity is undeniable. His Great Compromise ability allows him to gain extra Influence—a new resource in the game—and helps with Diplomatic Actions. It feels different. It feels like the game is finally admitting that history is shaped by thinkers, not just conquerors.
The Weird Ones and the Bold Choices
Let's talk about Confucius. Playing as a philosopher instead of a General feels... quiet? But his Scholar-Official ability lets you spread knowledge across your empire much faster. If you’re a science-first player, he’s likely going to be your go-to.
We also have Tecumseh. This is a big deal for representation and gameplay. He specializes in diplomacy and city-states (now called Independent Powers). His ability, Pan-Indian Confederacy, gives him more Food and Production for every Independent Power you're allied with. It’s a "strength in numbers" playstyle that rewards you for not being a total warmonger. Honestly, it’s refreshing.
How the Leader-Civ Split Actually Works
Okay, so you've seen the list of Civ 7 all leaders, but how do you actually use them? In previous games, the leader and the civ were one. Now, you pick your Leader at the start of the game. That leader stays with you through the Antiquity Age, the Exploration Age, and the Modern Age.
But your Civilization? That changes.
If you start as Augustus leading Rome in the Antiquity Age, you don't stay Rome forever. When the world transitions to the Exploration Age, you have to choose a new Civ. Maybe you become Norman. Maybe you become something else entirely. Your Leader—Augustus—keeps his specific bonuses, but your Civilization bonuses swap out. It’s a "layering" system. By the time you reach the Modern Age, you’re basically a geological core sample of three different cultures, all led by one immortal person.
- Attribute Points: This is the new RPG-lite mechanic. Every time your leader hits a milestone, you get points to dump into categories like Militarism, Science, or Culture.
- The Persona System: Firaxis is doing something called "Leader Personas." For example, you might have "Napoleon the Emperor" (militaristic) and "Napoleon the Revolutionary" (cultural). They are the same guy, but with different outfits and totally different ability sets.
- Diplomacy: It’s more personal now. Since leaders stay the same while civs change, your long-term beef with Montezuma might span 2,000 years, even if he’s currently leading the Mongol Empire.
Deep Dive into the Confirmed Roster
The list is still growing as we approach the release, but here is what we know about the heavy hitters.
Himiko represents a fascinating pivot for the series. Based on the shaman-queen of Yamatai, her gameplay revolves around the mystical and the diplomatic. She’s great for players who want to manipulate the board without necessarily moving a massive army across the sea. Her abilities tend to focus on the new "Influence" currency, which is basically the mana of the political world in Civ 7.
Machiavelli is perhaps the most "meta" addition. He’s all about the shadows. His unique ability is literally called The Prince. It rewards you for being a bit of a jerk—using spies, manipulating trade, and generally being the puppet master. If you like winning through the Diplomacy victory screen while everyone else is busy building tanks, he’s your guy.
Then you have the heavy-duty military leaders like Ashoka. But wait—there are two versions. Ashoka (World Renouncer) is focused on Peace and Food, reflecting his later life after his conversion to Buddhism. Ashoka (The Conqueror)... well, the name says it all. He’s there to crush. This dual-persona system is how Firaxis is handling the complex legacies of these historical figures without watering them down.
✨ Don't miss: Dragonbone City Styxia Chests: Why Most Players Are Looking in the Wrong Places
Why Are People Mad?
Go to any subreddit or forum and you'll see the fire. People are upset because they think it's "immersion breaking" to see Himiko leading the United States in the Modern Age. I get it. It’s weird. But from a gameplay perspective, it’s brilliant. It prevents the "snowball" effect where one civ is just better at everything. It forces you to adapt. You can't just pick Korea and turtle for a science victory for 10 hours. You have to navigate the transitions.
Strategy: Choosing the Right Pairings
Because Civ 7 all leaders are now "free agents," your strategy begins before you even place your first city.
If you pick a leader with heavy naval bonuses, but you choose a Civilization in the Antiquity Age that is land-locked, you’re playing at a disadvantage. You have to look at the "historical paths." The game suggests certain transitions—like Rome turning into the Normans—but it doesn't force you. You can go "off-road." Want to turn Rome into the Abbasid Dynasty? Go for it. The game will give you a slight penalty for not following a "historical" path, but sometimes the gameplay synergy is worth the cost.
- For Early Aggression: Stick with leaders like Amina or Ashoka (Conqueror). Pair them with militaristic Antiquity civs like Aksum.
- For Long-Term Tech: Benjamin Franklin or Confucius are the plays. You want to focus on high-yield science tiles early so you can hit the Exploration Age first.
- For the "Puppet Master": Machiavelli. Period. Use your influence to make everyone else fight while you build up your infrastructure.
The Role of "Independent Powers"
We have to talk about how leaders interact with the world. City-states are gone, replaced by Independent Powers. These aren't just static dots on the map. They have agendas. Your leader’s "Influence" stat determines how well you can boss them around.
Leaders like Tecumseh get massive buffs here. In the mid-game, having three or four Independent Powers as your "minions" is actually more effective than owning those cities directly. You get the resources without the administrative headache. It makes the map feel alive. It’s not just you vs. seven other AIs; it’s you vs. a complex web of minor factions that can be bought, bullied, or befriended.
📖 Related: Finding New York Times Spelling Bee Free: How to Play Without the Paywall
Understanding Leader Attributes
When you look at the Civ 7 all leaders screen, you'll see a series of icons. These represent their base attributes.
- Command: Increases unit experience and movement.
- Diplomacy: Increases Influence gain and trade route yields.
- Progress: Boosts Science and Culture.
- Economic: Boosts Gold and Production.
Every leader has a "preference," but you can steer them. If you take a military leader like Augustus but spend all your Attribute Points on Progress, you can effectively turn him into a scholar-emperor. It’s the most flexible Civ has ever been.
Actionable Steps for Your First Campaign
When the game drops, don't just jump in with your "favorite" leader from Civ 6. The rules have changed.
First, check the Age synergies. Look at the Civilization options for the Antiquity Age and see which leader's permanent ability complements those specific buildings. If you’re playing as Rome (the Civ), you want a leader who can take advantage of the "Legion" unique unit and the "Forum" building.
Second, don't ignore Influence. In previous games, you could ignore diplomacy and just win. In Civ 7, if your leader has low Influence, the Independent Powers will trade with your enemies and block your expansion. Make sure you’re putting at least a few points into Diplomacy regardless of who you pick.
Third, experiment with the "unnatural" paths. The most powerful combos in Civ 7 all leaders are likely the ones the developers didn't strictly intend. Pairing a high-gold leader with a high-production civ in the second age can lead to an unstoppable economy that lets you simply buy your way to a victory.
Finally, read the Personas carefully. Before you lock in a leader, check if you're using the right version of them. Napoleon (Emperor) is a completely different beast than Napoleon (Revolutionary). One wants to burn the world; the other wants to paint it. Choose the one that fits your actual playstyle, not just the name you recognize.