You've probably seen the drone footage. Eerie, silent rows of pastel-colored skyscrapers stretching into the horizon, surrounded by nothing but dirt and weeds. It looks like the set of a post-apocalyptic movie where the humans just… vanished. For years, the internet has been obsessed with the idea of empty cities in China, calling them "ghost cities" and using them as a shorthand for a coming economic doomsday. But the truth is a lot messier than a spooky YouTube thumbnail.
China builds. They build fast, and they build big.
When the Chinese government decides a patch of farmland needs to become a tech hub for five million people, they don't wait for the demand to show up first. They lay the grid. They build the subway. They erect the towers. It's a "build it and they will come" philosophy on steroids, fueled by a unique mix of state-mandated growth targets and a cultural obsession with real estate as the only "safe" place to put your money.
The Kangbashi Prototype
Take Ordos Kangbashi. It’s the poster child. Back in the late 2000s, it was the ultimate "ghost city." Journalists from the West flew in, saw the empty plazas and the massive, futuristic library that looked like a row of leaning books, and declared the whole thing a disaster. They weren't necessarily wrong at the time. You could walk down the middle of an eight-lane highway and not see a single car.
But if you go there today? It's actually kind of… normal.
It’s not Shanghai, sure. But there are people. Kids go to the high-quality schools that were moved there specifically to lure parents. The government gave people tax breaks to relocate. It took fifteen years, but the "ghost" eventually grew some skin. This is the nuance people miss: what looks like a failed city in year five might just be a city that hasn't started its life yet in a thirty-year plan.
Why Does China Keep Building Them?
It’s basically a math problem gone rogue.
📖 Related: AI in Finance Regulation News: What Most People Get Wrong
For decades, China’s GDP growth was the envy of the world. A huge chunk of that—estimates vary, but often sit around 25% to 30%—came from the property sector. Local governments rely on selling land to developers to fund their budgets. No land sales? No money for schools or hospitals. This creates a cycle where everyone is incentivized to keep the concrete pouring, even if the actual need for a 40-story apartment block in a provincial town is, frankly, questionable.
Then you have the "empty apartment" vs. "empty city" distinction.
In cities like Zhengzhou or Kunming, you might see "ghost neighborhoods" where every unit is sold but nobody lives there. In China, people buy apartments like Americans buy stocks. You buy a shell—no floors, no paint, just concrete—and you hold it. You don't rent it out because a "used" apartment is worth less than a "new" one. So, you have these massive towers that are 100% owned but 0% occupied. It creates a visual of a wasteland, even though on a balance sheet, the developer is laughing.
The Dark Side: When the Money Runs Out
Everything changed recently. You can’t talk about empty cities in China without mentioning Evergrande and Country Garden. The "Pre-sale" model—where you pay for your apartment before it's even built—hit a brick wall.
When the government clamped down on debt with the "Three Red Lines" policy, the cash stopped flowing. Suddenly, those "ghost cities" weren't just waiting for people; they were stopping mid-construction. Now, instead of finished empty buildings, China is littered with lanweilo—"rotting tail" buildings. These are skeletal concrete husks with rusted cranes frozen over them.
This isn't just a quirky urban planning fail anymore. It's a genuine crisis for the middle class. If your entire life savings is tied up in a concrete shell in a city that might never be finished, you aren't just living in a ghost city—you're living in a financial nightmare.
💡 You might also like: Why sg dollar to rm malaysia is finally changing: What you need to know
Misconceptions and the "Pudong" Effect
Everyone loves to point at Pudong in Shanghai. In the 90s, it was a marshy wasteland with one lonely TV tower. People mocked it. Now? It’s one of the most iconic skylines on the planet.
Westerners often view urban development through a market-demand lens. We think: "Who wants to live here?" The Chinese state thinks: "Where do we want people to move?"
By moving top-tier hospitals and the best middle schools into these empty zones, the government "forces" the population to follow. It’s a top-down urbanization that is fundamentally alien to how Western cities like London or New York grew over centuries.
But there’s a limit.
China’s population is shrinking. The demographic cliff is real. You can build a city for five million people, but if there aren't five million people to move in—or if they can't afford the mortgage because the economy is cooling—the "ghost" label becomes permanent. Tianducheng, the famous Paris replica with its own Eiffel Tower, has struggled for years. It’s a bit more populated now, but it still feels like a surreal, hollow imitation of life.
The Real Estate Trap
If you're trying to understand the scale, think about the "vacancy rate." Some researchers, like Professor Gan Li from the Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, have suggested that over 20% of urban housing in China is empty. That’s roughly 65 million apartments.
That is enough to house the entire population of France.
Why don't they just lower the prices? Because if property prices crash, the Chinese middle class loses its wealth overnight. It’s a hostage situation. The government has to keep prices high enough to prevent a revolt but low enough to eventually get people to move in. It's a tightrope walk over a canyon filled with unsold rebar.
What Should You Actually Watch For?
Don't just look at the empty buildings. Look at the infrastructure.
A "ghost city" with a high-speed rail link to a major hub like Shenzhen or Beijing has a chance. A "ghost city" in the middle of a coal-mining province with no industry other than the construction itself? That’s where the real trouble lies. Those are the places that will eventually be reclaimed by the dirt they were built on.
We are seeing a shift from "Ghost Cities" to "Shrinking Cities." In places like Hegang in the far northeast, apartments are selling for the price of a used car. Not because they are new and empty, but because the jobs left and the people followed the money to the coast.
📖 Related: Converting 10000 Dollars to Rands: What Most People Get Wrong About the Exchange
Actionable Insights for Following the Trend
If you are tracking the Chinese property market or the "ghost city" phenomenon, keep these points in mind to cut through the hype:
- Distinguish between "Unfinished" and "Unoccupied." An unfinished building (lanweilo) is a sign of developer bankruptcy and systemic risk. An empty but finished building is a sign of speculative holding or early-stage urban planning.
- Follow the "First-Tier" ripple. Check if the empty city is a satellite of a "First-Tier" city (Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, Shenzhen). These almost always fill up eventually. The ones in the "Third-Tier" or "Fourth-Tier" are the high-risk zones.
- Monitor the "White List." The Chinese government has started a "white list" of housing projects that banks are required to fund to ensure completion. Tracking which projects get this funding tells you which "ghosts" the government is willing to save.
- Look at demographics, not just construction. With a declining birth rate, the sheer volume of housing supply in China is now fundamentally mismatched with future demand. The "build it and they will come" era is effectively over, replaced by a "save what we can" era.
The era of the sprawling, ambitious empty city is likely behind us. What remains is a massive experiment in urban engineering that is currently facing its toughest test: a world where there are more buildings than there are people to fill them.