You probably think the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court is the boss of the other eight justices. It makes sense, right? The title sounds like a CEO or a general. But honestly, in the world of the high court, that’s just not how it works.
If you sat in on a private conference at the Supreme Court today, in early 2026, you’d see John Roberts—the 17th person to hold the job—leading the discussion. He’s been there since 2005. He sits at the head of the table. He speaks first. But when it comes time to actually vote on a case? His vote carries exactly the same weight as the newest associate justice.
He’s "first among equals." Basically, he has a bigger desk and a lot more paperwork, but he can't tell Justice Thomas or Justice Jackson how to rule.
The Stealth Power of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court
So, if the Chief Justice doesn't have "command" power, why does the job matter so much? It comes down to two words: The Assignment.
When the court finishes hearing arguments, the nine justices meet alone. No clerks. No cameras. Just them. They vote. If the Chief Justice is in the majority, he gets to decide who writes the official opinion of the court. This is a massive deal.
Think about it. He can keep the "big" cases for himself to control the tone, or he can give them to a more moderate justice to keep the ruling narrow. In 2024’s Trump v. United States decision regarding presidential immunity, Roberts wrote it himself. He shaped the entire legal framework for how we view executive power. If he had been in the minority, that power would have shifted to the most senior justice in the majority.
📖 Related: Snow This Weekend Boston: Why the Forecast Is Making Meteorologists Nervous
It’s Not Just About Lawsuits
Most people ignore the administrative side, but the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court is essentially the COO of the entire federal judiciary.
- He runs the Judicial Conference of the United States.
- He appoints judges to the "secret" FISA court (the ones who handle national security wiretaps).
- He oversees a budget of billions for all federal courts.
- He’s the Chancellor of the Smithsonian Institution. (Yes, he actually helps run the museums).
It's a lot. Justice Warren Burger once complained that about a third of his time was eaten up by this "manager" stuff instead of actually reading law.
The "Roberts Court" in 2026: A Balancing Act
Right now, the court is facing a massive workload. Just this week, in mid-January 2026, Roberts released his annual report on the state of the judiciary. Interestingly, he spent the first seven pages talking about Thomas Paine and the Declaration of Independence. Why? Because the court is under fire.
The current Chief Justice of the Supreme Court is obsessed with the Court’s "legitimacy." He hates it when people see the justices as "politicians in robes." But with a 6-3 conservative majority, that’s a tough sell.
Recent High-Stakes Rulings
In the last two years, we've seen the court move at breakneck speed.
👉 See also: Removing the Department of Education: What Really Happened with the Plan to Shutter the Agency
- The End of Chevron: In Loper Bright, the court killed "Chevron deference," meaning judges, not government agencies, now decide what vague laws mean.
- Social Issues: From transgender medical care bans to gun rights, the "Chief" has had his hands full trying to keep a lid on the more radical impulses of both the left and right wings of his bench.
- The 2026 Docket: We’re currently looking at massive cases regarding birthright citizenship and presidential tariffs.
Roberts often tries to find a "middle way." He famously said, "If it's not necessary to decide more to dispose of a case, it is necessary not to decide more." He’s a minimalist in a room full of maximalists.
The Impeachment Weirdness
Here is a trivia fact that sounds fake but is 100% true. The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court is only mentioned once in the actual U.S. Constitution. And it’s not even in the section about the courts (Article III).
It's in Article I. It says the Chief Justice must preside over the Senate trial if a President is impeached. That’s it. The framers didn't even formally create the "office" of Chief Justice in the Constitution; they just assumed there’d be one. The actual title and structure were "filled in" later by the Judiciary Act of 1789.
Why the Job is Getting Harder
Historically, the Chief Justice stayed out of the mud. But the world has changed. Roberts has had to issue rare public rebukes to both parties. He once famously corrected a president, saying, "We do not have Obama judges or Trump judges, Bush judges or Clinton judges."
He’s trying to protect the "brand."
✨ Don't miss: Quién ganó para presidente en USA: Lo que realmente pasó y lo que viene ahora
But in 2026, that brand is being tested by ethics controversies and "shadow docket" rulings. Unlike Associate Justices, the Chief is the face of the branch. When someone is mad at a federal judge in a small town in Idaho, they ultimately look at the Chief.
Actionable Insights for Following the Court
If you want to understand how the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court is actually influencing the country, don't just look at the final "Win/Loss" column.
- Watch the "Grant of Certiorari": See which cases the Court picks. The Chief has a huge hand in setting the agenda.
- Read the Concurrences: Sometimes Roberts will vote with the majority but write a separate "concurring" opinion. This is usually him saying, "I agree with the result, but you guys went way too far with the reasoning."
- Check the Year-End Reports: These are published every December 31st. They are the best way to see what the Chief actually cares about—whether it's AI in the courts or judicial security.
The role isn't just about wearing a black robe and hitting a gavel. It's about being the institutional anchor for a country that feels like it's drifting. Whether you like his rulings or not, the Chief Justice is the only person standing between the law and the "welter of partisan politics," as he recently quoted Calvin Coolidge.
Keep an eye on the upcoming 2026 rulings on voting rights. That is where we will see if the "Roberts Court" remains a steady hand or shifts into a new era of judicial activism. To stay truly informed, follow the oral argument transcripts released on the Supreme Court's official website; they often reveal more about a justice's leaning than the final 100-page written opinion ever will.