You’ve seen them a thousand times. Maybe you were sitting in a sterile conference room or scrolling through a financial report when they popped up: the word after bar or pie is almost always chart. It’s the foundational unit of how we communicate data, yet most people treat these visuals like an afterthought. They just click a button in Excel and hope for the best.
Honestly? Most charts are terrible.
They are cluttered, misleading, or just plain boring. We use a bar chart when we should have used a line graph, or we jam sixteen different slices into a pie chart until it looks like a kaleidoscope gone wrong. Data visualization isn't just about making things look "pretty." It’s about cognitive load. It’s about how fast a human brain can process information without getting a headache. When we talk about the chart as a tool, we’re talking about the bridge between raw numbers and actual human understanding.
Why the Bar Chart is the Undisputed King
There’s a reason the bar chart is the default. It’s because humans are incredibly good at comparing lengths. It’s an evolutionary thing. We can look at two rectangles side-by-side and instantly know which one is taller.
You don't have to think. You just know.
According to Edward Tufte, perhaps the most famous figure in data design and author of The Visual Display of Quantitative Information, the goal of any good chart should be "graphical excellence." This means giving the viewer the greatest number of ideas in the shortest time with the least ink in the smallest space.
Bar charts do this perfectly. They have a common baseline—usually zero—which gives our eyes a fixed point of reference. If you start your Y-axis at 50 instead of 0 to make a small difference look huge, you aren't just being clever. You’re lying. That’s "chartjunk," a term Tufte coined to describe useless or misleading decoration that distracts from the data itself.
Think about a standard bar chart showing quarterly revenue. You see the bars go up, you feel good. You see them go down, you worry. It's visceral. But even here, people mess up. They use 3D effects. Why? Because it looks "professional"? It doesn’t. 3D bars actually distort the top of the bar, making it harder to read the actual value against the gridlines. It’s a classic case of form over function.
The Pie Chart: Most Hated, Most Used
Now we get to the controversial stuff. If you ask a data scientist about the pie chart, they’ll probably groan. Some, like visualization expert Stephen Few, have spent years trying to convince people to stop using them entirely.
The problem is simple: our brains are bad at measuring angles and areas.
If you have two slices of a pie that are 32% and 35%, most people can’t tell which is bigger just by looking. We struggle. We squint. We have to look at the labels. If you have to read the labels to understand the chart, the visual has failed.
However, pie charts aren't going anywhere. They are great for showing "part-to-whole" relationships when you only have two or three categories. If you're showing "People who like coffee" vs. "People who don't," a pie chart is fine. It’s a circle. We get it. But once you hit five, six, or seven categories? Forget it. It becomes a mess of tiny slivers that communicate nothing.
Beyond the Basics: When a Chart Becomes Art
We've moved past the era of simple static images. In 2026, the word after bar or pie often refers to interactive experiences. Look at the work of the late Hans Rosling. His "Gapminder" displays turned boring global health statistics into moving, bubbling stories. He didn’t just show a chart; he showed a narrative of human progress.
This is where the concept of "Data Storytelling" comes in. A bar chart tells you what happened. A well-designed dashboard or an annotated series of charts tells you why.
Common Mistakes That Ruin Your Data
- Color Overload: Using every color in the rainbow makes your chart look like a bag of Skittles. Use color to highlight the most important data point, not to make it look festive.
- The Legend Problem: If your reader has to keep looking back and forth between a legend and the bars, you’ve lost them. Label the data directly.
- Over-Aggregation: Sometimes a bar chart hides the truth because it averages everything out. If you have huge outliers, a simple bar might not be the right chart for the job.
The Cognitive Science of the Chart
Why does this matter so much? Because of "Pre-attentive Attributes." These are the things our brain notices before we even realize we’re looking at something. Length, color, size, and orientation.
💡 You might also like: How to Read Article Behind Paywall: What Actually Works Right Now
When you create a bar chart, you are hacking the viewer's brain. You are using their natural hardware to deliver a message. If you use a pie chart for time-series data (showing how something changes over years), you are fighting against that hardware. It’s like trying to run a modern video game on a 1990s calculator. It just won't work well.
Alberto Cairo, a professor of visual journalism at the University of Miami, argues in his book The Functional Art that a chart is a technology. It’s a tool we build to extend our natural reach. Just like a telescope lets us see further, a good chart lets us see patterns in thousands of rows of data that we would never notice otherwise.
Real-World Impact: When Charts Save Lives
This isn't just academic. Look at the "Broad Street Pump" map by John Snow from 1854. While technically a map, it functioned as a distribution chart. By plotting cholera deaths as bars on a map, Snow proved the disease was waterborne. He didn't need a complex algorithm. He just needed a clear visual representation of the data.
He changed the world with a few bars.
In modern business, the wrong chart can lead to catastrophic decisions. If a supply chain manager looks at an averaged bar chart and misses a massive spike in defects because it was "smoothed out," the company loses millions. Accuracy isn't just about the numbers; it's about how those numbers are translated into the visual realm.
Actionable Steps for Better Visuals
Stop just clicking "Insert Chart." Before you make your next visual, ask yourself one question: What is the one thing I want the audience to remember?
- Choose the right format. Use a bar chart for comparisons. Use a pie chart (sparingly) for parts of a whole. Use a line chart for trends over time.
- Kill the clutter. Remove the gridlines if you don't need them. Remove the borders. Let the data breathe.
- Order matters. In a bar chart, don't just list items alphabetically unless there’s a good reason. Order them from largest to smallest. It makes the "ranking" immediately obvious.
- Write a headline, not a title. Instead of "Q3 Sales Performance," try "Q3 Sales Rose 15% Despite Shipping Delays." Tell the reader what the chart is saying.
- Check for accessibility. About 8% of men have some form of color blindness. If your chart relies on red vs. green to show "good" vs. "bad," a significant portion of your audience might see nothing but gray. Use patterns or different shades of the same color instead.
The next time you find yourself typing a word after bar or pie, remember that you are designing a piece of communication. You aren't just filling a slide. You are attempting to transfer an idea from your mind into someone else's using the most efficient medium we've ever invented: the chart. Respect the data, respect the viewer, and for the love of all things holy, stop using 3D effects.