History tends to be pretty brutal to the losers, and Charles IV of Spain is usually painted as the ultimate loser. You've probably seen the Goya portraits. He looks a bit dazed, maybe even a little "not all there," standing next to his wife, Maria Luisa, who clearly looks like the one holding the keys to the kingdom. Honestly, the guy gets a bad rap for being a simpleton who just wanted to hunt deer while Napoleon was dismantling his empire, but when you look at the mess he inherited, it’s a bit more complicated than just a "lazy king" narrative.
He wasn’t a villain. He wasn’t even particularly cruel. He was just a man deeply out of his depth in a century that was moving way too fast for the Bourbon dynasty.
The Bourbon Family Business and the Godoy Problem
Charles IV took the throne in 1788, right before the world caught fire. His dad, Charles III, was actually a pretty decent king—one of those "enlightened despots" who tried to fix the economy. But when Charles IV stepped in, he wasn't interested in the day-to-day grind of governing. He was a big, tall, physically strong guy who preferred the outdoors. He liked clocks. He liked carpentry. He really, really liked hunting.
Because he didn't want to deal with the paperwork, he handed the keys to Manuel de Godoy.
This is where the drama starts. Godoy was a young guardsman who rose to power at a speed that made everyone’s head spin. The rumors back then—and they were loud—said Godoy was the Queen's lover. Whether that was true or just juicy palace gossip, the result was the same: Charles IV trusted Godoy implicitly. You had a situation where a middle-ranking soldier was basically running one of the largest empires on earth because the King didn't want to sit in meetings.
The Spanish nobility hated it. The King's own son, Ferdinand, absolutely loathed Godoy. This internal rot made Spain look like an easy target for a certain short-ish French general named Napoleon Bonaparte.
Why Charles IV of Spain Couldn't Stop the French Revolution
Imagine being a king who believes God put you on the throne, and then suddenly, the people in the country next door (France) chop their king's head off. That was the reality for Charles IV in 1793. His cousin, Louis XVI, was executed, and Charles was stuck. Does he go to war to avenge his family? Does he stay quiet to avoid the same fate?
📖 Related: Is there actually a legal age to stay home alone? What parents need to know
He tried both. And both failed.
Spain initially joined the coalition against Revolutionary France, but they got beat. Badly. By 1795, Godoy pivoted and signed the Peace of Basel, basically making Spain a "junior partner" to France. This was the beginning of the end. By tying Spain’s horse to Napoleon’s wagon, Charles IV essentially signed away his navy at the Battle of Trafalgar in 1805.
Think about that for a second. Spain was a global maritime superpower. After Trafalgar, their fleet was at the bottom of the ocean. The link to their American colonies was severed. The money stopped coming in.
The Abdication Mess at Bayonne
By 1808, the Spanish people had enough. They were starving, the economy was trashed, and French troops were "passing through" Spain to get to Portugal—except they never actually left.
Chaos broke out at the Mutiny of Aranjuez. Charles IV was so terrified by the mob that he abdicated in favor of his son, Ferdinand VII. But then, he immediately regretted it. He claimed he was forced into it (which he was) and asked Napoleon to mediate.
This was the ultimate trap.
👉 See also: The Long Haired Russian Cat Explained: Why the Siberian is Basically a Living Legend
Napoleon invited the whole dysfunctional family to Bayonne, France. It was basically a high-stakes intervention from hell. Napoleon got Charles to confirm he wanted the throne back, then got Ferdinand to give it back to Charles, and then forced Charles to hand the whole country over to... Napoleon's brother, Joseph Bonaparte.
Just like that, the Spanish Bourbons were out. Charles IV spent the rest of his life in exile, mostly in Italy, living off a pension from the man who stole his crown. He died in Rome in 1819, probably still wondering where it all went wrong.
The Goya Connection: Seeing Through the Paint
If you want to understand the vibe of this era, you have to look at Francisco Goya. He was the court painter, and his portrait The Family of Charles IV is one of the most famous—and arguably insulting—royal portraits ever made.
Experts like Robert Hughes have pointed out that Goya didn't necessarily hate the King, but he didn't hide anything either. You see the King looking pompous but empty. You see the Queen, Maria Luisa, front and center, looking sharp and controlling. You see a family that looks more like people who won the lottery than a majestic dynasty. It’s raw. It’s honest. It shows a monarchy that had lost its "sacred" aura.
Life in the Shadow of Greatness
- The Clock Hobby: Charles owned hundreds of clocks. He was obsessed with the mechanics of them. There's a certain irony in a man who could fix a complex watch but couldn't keep a country running.
- The Hunting Addiction: He reportedly hunted every single day, regardless of the weather or the political crisis of the week.
- The Paternal Instinct: Despite the rumors about his wife, he was famously devoted to her. He wasn't a philanderer like many kings of his time; he just wanted a quiet life, which is the one thing a 18th-century monarch couldn't have.
The Long-Term Impact on Latin America
We usually focus on the Peninsular War in Spain, but the real legacy of Charles IV’s reign is the map of the world today. When he gave up the throne at Bayonne, he created a "power vacuum."
The Spanish colonies in Mexico, Peru, and Argentina didn't recognize Joseph Bonaparte. They said, "We are loyal to the 'true' king," but since the true king was in a French jail, they started governing themselves. This was the spark for the Spanish American wars of independence.
✨ Don't miss: Why Every Mom and Daughter Photo You Take Actually Matters
Without the specific incompetence and bad luck of Charles IV, the Spanish Empire might have limped along for another century. Instead, it collapsed like a house of cards in less than two decades.
What We Get Wrong About Him
Most people think Charles IV was "stupid." He wasn't. He was actually quite cultured and a major patron of the arts (without him, Goya might not have become Goya). The problem wasn't a lack of IQ; it was a lack of character for the specific moment in history he inhabited.
He was a 17th-century man living in a 19th-century world. He believed in the old ways—loyalty, family, and hunting—while the world was moving toward nationalism, total war, and revolution.
Actionable Takeaways for History Buffs
If you’re interested in diving deeper into this specific, messy turning point in history, here is how to actually explore the world of Charles IV:
- Visit the Royal Palace in Madrid: Specifically, look at the "Charles IV rooms." You'll see the sheer opulence that blinded the court to the suffering of the peasants outside the gates.
- Study Goya's "Black Paintings": While these came later, they represent the psychological trauma Spain suffered because of the vacuum Charles left behind.
- Read "The Sun King's" Legacy: Look into how the Bourbon reforms of his father actually set Charles up for failure by centralizing too much power in a throne that he didn't want to sit in.
- Analyze the Treaty of Fontainebleau: Read the actual text of the agreements Godoy made with Napoleon. It’s a masterclass in how "diplomacy" can actually be a slow-motion surrender.
Charles IV of Spain remains a cautionary tale. He proves that being a "nice guy" or having "refined tastes" isn't enough when you're at the helm of an empire. Sometimes, the most dangerous thing a leader can do is simply nothing at all.
To truly understand the collapse of the Spanish Empire, stop looking at the generals and start looking at the man who preferred his clocks and his hunting dogs to the messy business of being King. He didn't lose Spain because he was evil; he lost it because he wasn't interested in keeping it.