Arthur Morgan wasn’t supposed to win. When Rockstar Games announced a prequel to their 2010 masterpiece, the collective internet collective groaned because we already knew how the story ended. We knew John Marston survived—sort of—and we knew the gang fell apart. But then we actually met the characters Red Dead Redemption 2 introduced, and everything changed.
It’s about the coughing. That’s the thing people forget when they talk about "epic" gaming moments. It isn’t always the shootout at the OK Corral. Sometimes, it’s just a man getting sick and realizing his life was built on a lie told by a charismatic narcissist in a fancy vest.
The Dutch van der Linde Problem
Dutch is a terrifyingly realistic depiction of a cult leader. He doesn’t start out as a villain. That’s the trap. In the early chapters of the 1899 setting, he’s the father figure everyone needs. He talks about freedom. He talks about "the plan." Honestly, by the time you're halfway through the game, you start to realize the plan is just Dutch's ego dressed up as philosophy.
Benjamin Byron Davis, the actor who voiced Dutch, brings this weird, shaky vulnerability to the role that makes you want to believe him even when he’s clearly losing his mind. He’s obsessed with the "old ways," but he’s also the first person to use modern violence to solve a problem. It’s a contradiction. Most games give you a boss to hate; Red Dead gives you a father to mourn.
You see this most clearly in his relationship with Hosea Matthews. Hosea is the soul of the camp. He’s the one who tells Dutch to stop. When Hosea dies in Saint Denis, the brakes come off. Without that grounding influence, the characters Red Dead Redemption fans grew to love are basically left in a freefall.
Arthur Morgan vs. John Marston
There is a constant debate about who the "better" protagonist is. It’s a bit of a silly argument, really. John is a classic Western hero—stoic, a bit slow on the uptake, and ultimately a man trying to buy back his soul with lead. But Arthur? Arthur is a deconstruction of the entire genre.
🔗 Read more: Stick War: Why This Flash Classic Still Dominates Strategy Gaming
Arthur starts as the "enforcer." He’s the guy you send to beat up a farmer for five dollars. He’s not particularly "good" at the start of the game. That’s why the redemption arc works. It isn't a sudden flip of a switch. It’s a slow, agonizing realization that his loyalty was misplaced.
- The Loyalty Trap: Arthur’s biggest flaw isn't his violence; it’s his inability to say no to Dutch until it’s far too late.
- The Journal: If you haven't read Arthur's handwritten notes in the game's menu, you're missing half the story. It shows a sensitive, artistic man who hides behind a mask of brutality.
- The Redemption Path: Depending on your honor level, Arthur’s death changes. It’s one of the few times a "choice" in a game feels like it actually defines the character's soul rather than just changing a cutscene.
The Women of the Van der Linde Gang
For a long time, Westerns treated women as background noise—either the damsel or the barmaid. Rockstar flipped that. Sadie Adler is probably the most aggressive character arc in the series. She goes from a grieving widow hiding in a cellar to a bounty hunter who is arguably more dangerous than Arthur.
Then there’s Abigail Marston. People used to find her annoying in the first game because she was always "nagging" John. But looking at it through the lens of the prequel? She’s the only one with her head on straight. She is fighting for the survival of her son, Jack, while the men around her are playing cowboy and getting themselves killed for a "score" that doesn't exist.
Why Micah Bell is the Perfect Villain
Basically, everyone hates Micah. He’s a rat. He’s racist, sexist, and has no moral compass. But as a character, he’s essential. He is the mirror image of Dutch’s true nature. While Arthur represents the "noble outlaw" myth that Dutch tries to project, Micah represents the ugly reality of what they actually are: thieves and killers.
Micah doesn’t change. He doesn’t have an arc. He’s a catalyst that speeds up the decay of the gang. Peter Blomquist played him with such a slimy, high-pitched drawl that players felt a physical reaction to his presence in camp. That is hard to pull off in a digital medium.
💡 You might also like: Solitaire Games Free Online Klondike: What Most People Get Wrong
The Tragedy of Side Characters
The world feels alive because the characters Red Dead Redemption populates its map with aren't just quest-givers. Take Charles Smith. He’s perhaps the most moral person in the entire group. He’s a man caught between two worlds—his Black and Native American heritage—finding a "home" in a gang that is fundamentally doomed.
Or Lenny Summers. The "A Quiet Time" mission where you get drunk with Lenny is arguably the most famous sequence in the game. Why? Because it’s human. It’s just two friends having a terrible, hilarious night out. When Lenny dies suddenly during the Saint Denis bank robbery, it isn’t a cinematic moment. It’s fast. It’s messy. You don’t even get a goodbye. That’s how the West actually ended—not with a sunset, but with a body left on a rooftop.
The Evolution of Jack Marston
We see Jack grow from a little boy who likes fishing to a teenager who hates his father, and finally, in the 1914 epilogue of the first game, to a man who has become exactly what his parents died to prevent him from being. It’s a cycle.
The tragedy of the characters Red Dead Redemption focuses on is that they are all trying to escape the inevitable. They are fighting against the "civilization" that is moving West. But you can't shoot the passage of time.
Realism and Nuance in Character Design
A lot of the "life" in these people comes from the mundane stuff. The camp interactions are scripted with thousands of lines of dialogue that most players will never hear. If you sit by the fire, you'll hear Bill Williamson talk about his discharge from the army. You'll see Karen slowly succumb to alcoholism as the pressure of the lifestyle gets to her.
📖 Related: Does Shedletsky Have Kids? What Most People Get Wrong
It’s these small details that make the cast feel like more than just polygons. They have routines. They argue about who’s doing the chores. They sing songs.
- Sean MacGuire: The loud-mouthed Irishman who provides the comedy until his sudden, shocking exit in Rhodes.
- Pearson: The camp cook who constantly reminisces about his time in the Navy, serving as a reminder that these people had lives before they became outlaws.
- Tilly Jackson: A former gang member who escaped a much worse life, showing that for some, the Van der Linde gang actually was a sanctuary for a while.
What Most People Get Wrong About the Ending
People often say the story is about the "Death of the West." Sorta. But more specifically, it’s about the death of the idea of the West. By the time John Marston is hunting down his old friends in 1911, the frontier is already gone. There are cars. There are federal agents with telephones and high-powered rifles.
The characters aren't just dying; they are becoming obsolete. Dutch realizes this at the end of the first game (and the end of the timeline) when he says, "Our time has passed." He knows he can't fight gravity.
Moving Forward: How to Experience the Story Fully
If you’re diving back into the world of these characters Red Dead Redemption has immortalized, don't rush the main story. The "Yellow" missions on your map are only half the game.
Actionable Steps for Your Next Playthrough:
- Hang out in camp: Spend at least one full in-game day per chapter just walking around the camp. Listen to the background conversations. This is where the real character development happens.
- Read the letters: Throughout the world, you’ll find letters in drawers and on bodies. They often provide context for the gang members or the people they’ve encountered.
- Watch the eyes: The facial capture in this game is insane. During the final confrontations between Arthur and Dutch, stop looking at the guns and look at their expressions. The betrayal is written in the micro-movements of their faces.
- Play the Epilogue: Many people stop after Arthur’s story ends. Don't. The epilogue isn't just "extra" content; it’s the bridge that makes the first game’s story make sense. It’s the slow build of a house—literally—that represents the fleeting dream of a normal life.
The legacy of these characters isn't just that they were "cool" cowboys. It's that they were deeply flawed, often unlikeable, and heartbreakingly human people trying to survive a world that no longer had room for them. That’s why we’re still talking about them years later.
To truly understand the narrative depth, focus on the High Honor path for Arthur. It changes the dialogue in subtle ways that make the eventual fallout with Dutch feel like a philosophical tragedy rather than just a gang war. Pay attention to the way other characters react to your reputation; the world remembers what you do, and so do the people in it.