It was 2010. 3D movies were exploding because everyone wanted to be James Cameron, and somehow, we ended up with a sequel to a talking-animal movie from nine years prior. Cats & Dogs: The Revenge of Kitty Galore is one of those sequels that honestly feels like it shouldn’t exist, yet here it is, a time capsule of early 2010s pop culture, frantic CGI, and a surprisingly deep voice cast that included everyone from James Marsden to Bette Midler.
If you grew up with the original 2001 film, the sequel was a total pivot. The first one was a goofy spy parody about a Beagle named Lou. This one? It went full James Bond. It’s got the gadgets. It’s got the underground bunkers. It’s even got a Bond-style opening credits sequence that is way more high-effort than it has any right to be.
Why Cats & Dogs: The Revenge of Kitty Galore Went Full Spy Movie
The plot is basically "The Silence of the Lambs" meets "Moonraker," but for kids. You’ve got Diggs, a police German Shepherd who is basically a loose cannon—classic trope—partnering up with Butch, the veteran agent. They have to stop Kitty Galore, a hairless Sphynx cat who lost her fur in a vat of hair removal cream at a cosmetics factory.
She's mad. Like, "destroy the world" mad.
What’s interesting about Cats & Dogs: The Revenge of Kitty Galore is the shift in the "war." In the first movie, it was strictly dogs vs. cats. In this one, they have to team up. It’s a "forced proximity" buddy-cop movie. They introduce the agency M.E.O.W.S. (Mammals Enlisting Against Weirdy Species), which is just peak pun work. Catherine, a cat agent voiced by Christina Applegate, joins the dogs, and that dynamic is where most of the humor tries to land.
The Voice Cast Was Actually Kind of Stacked
Looking back at the credits is wild. You’ve got:
- James Marsden as Diggs (the hero dog).
- Nick Nolte as Butch (the gruff mentor).
- Bette Midler as Kitty Galore (doing her best campy villain voice).
- Katt Williams as Seamus the Pigeon (the comic relief).
- Neil Patrick Harris as Lou (the grown-up dog from the first movie).
It’s a weirdly prestigious group for a movie where a cat wears a disguise to look like a human lady. But that was the era. Studios were throwing serious money at live-action/CGI hybrids because Alvin and the Chipmunks had just made a billion dollars.
✨ Don't miss: Why October London Make Me Wanna Is the Soul Revival We Actually Needed
The CGI Problem and the Uncanny Valley
One thing people forget is how much we tolerated "uncanny valley" animals back then. In Cats & Dogs: The Revenge of Kitty Galore, the blend of real animals and digital mouth movements is... a choice. It’s better than the first one, technically, but it still feels a bit surreal.
The production used a mix of animatronics from Tippett Studio and digital work from Rhythm & Hues. If those names sound familiar, it’s because Tippett did Jurassic Park and Rhythm & Hues won an Oscar for Life of Pi. They weren't messing around. Yet, seeing a cat with Bette Midler’s lip-syncing movements will always be a little unsettling.
Honestly, the practical effects hold up way better. When you see a real dog sitting in a high-tech jet, it’s charming. When that dog starts doing kung-fu with digital paws, the illusion breaks. But kids didn't care in 2010, and honestly, we probably shouldn't care too much now. It was meant to be spectacle.
The Bond Parody That Actually Works
The movie is obsessed with 007. The villain’s name, Kitty Galore, is a direct play on Pussy Galore from Goldfinger. The opening song is a Shirley Bassey-esque track performed by Sean Kingston. There are gadgets that look like they were rejected from a Pierce Brosnan-era Bond flick.
There’s even a scene where they go to a high-security prison to talk to Mr. Tinkles—the villain from the first movie—who is strapped into a Hannibal Lecter-style muzzle. It’s a level of meta-commentary that most kids wouldn't get, but the parents in the theater probably appreciated. Sorta.
Why It Didn't Hit Like the Original
The first Cats & Dogs was a massive sleeper hit. It made over $200 million on a relatively modest budget. Cats & Dogs: The Revenge of Kitty Galore didn't quite catch that same lightning in a bottle.
🔗 Read more: How to Watch The Wolf and the Lion Without Getting Lost in the Wild
Part of it was timing. By 2010, the "talking animal" genre was getting crowded. We had Beverly Hills Chihuahua, Underdog, and a million Air Bud spin-offs. The novelty had worn off. Also, the nine-year gap between movies was way too long. The kids who loved the first one were in college by the time the sequel came out.
Critically, it got hammered. It sits at about 13% on Rotten Tomatoes. Critics called it loud and messy. But if you watch it today through the lens of "early 2010s chaos," it’s actually kind of fascinating. It’s a movie that commits 100% to its ridiculous premise. There’s no winking at the camera or apologizing for the plot. It just goes.
The Legacy of the Franchise
Surprisingly, this wasn't the end. In 2020, they released a third movie called Cats & Dogs 3: Paws Unite!. It went straight to video and had a much smaller budget, but it proves that the concept of "pets as secret agents" is basically immortal.
Cats & Dogs: The Revenge of Kitty Galore remains the peak of the series in terms of sheer scale. It was a $85 million production. That’s a lot of money for a movie about a hairless cat trying to broadcast a "Call of the Wild" frequency to make all dogs go crazy.
What We Get Wrong About These Movies
We tend to lump all these 2000s animal movies together as "bad," but there’s a craft to them. Training the animals alone is a monumental task. The head animal trainer, Mathilde de Cagny, worked with dozens of dogs and cats to get the base performances before the CGI teams even touched the footage.
There's a specific charm to live-action animals that full-CGI movies like The Secret Life of Pets just don't have. There’s a weight to the characters. When a real German Shepherd looks sad, you feel it more than when a digital model does.
💡 You might also like: Is Lincoln Lawyer Coming Back? Mickey Haller's Next Move Explained
How to Revisit the Movie Today
If you’re planning to rewatch Cats & Dogs: The Revenge of Kitty Galore, don’t go in expecting Pixar-level storytelling. Go in for the vibes. Look at the weird tech. Enjoy Bette Midler chewing the scenery (as a cat).
It’s currently available on most PVOD platforms like Amazon and Apple TV, and it pops up on Max (formerly HBO Max) pretty regularly.
Actionable Takeaways for the Curious:
- Watch the Opening Credits: Even if you don't watch the whole movie, find the opening sequence on YouTube. It’s a genuine piece of art that parodies the Maurice Binder Bond titles perfectly.
- Look for the Easter Eggs: Keep an eye out for the references to The Silence of the Lambs and various 60s spy shows like Get Smart.
- Appreciate the Animatronics: Try to spot the difference between the real animals, the puppets, and the CGI. The Tippett Studio puppets are surprisingly detailed.
- Context Matters: Remember that this was released during the height of the 3D craze. Some of the "coming at the camera" shots look a bit goofy in 2D, but they were a big deal in theaters.
Ultimately, the movie is a loud, colorful, and slightly bizarre relic of a specific time in Hollywood. It’s not a masterpiece, but it’s a lot more ambitious than people give it credit for. Whether you love it or hate it, you have to respect a film that puts a pigeon in a tuxedo and calls it "cinema."
Next Steps for Fans of the Genre:
Check out the original 2001 film first to see how the "lore" started. If you want to see how the tech evolved, compare the CGI in this film to the 2020 sequel. For a deeper look at how they trained the animals, search for behind-the-scenes featurettes involving Mathilde de Cagny; her work on films like Marley & Me and Hugo is legendary in the industry.