If you’ve ever tried to sell an old MP3 or a digital movie you don't watch anymore, you’ve probably realized something annoying. You can't. Not legally, anyway. This whole mess traces back to a massive legal fight in the Southern District of New York, officially known as Capitol Records, LLC v. ReDigi Inc., or case 1:16-cv-07673-RA.
It’s the case that basically killed the "used digital goods" market before it could even get off the ground.
📖 Related: Why Every Picture of a Bomb You See Online is Probably Fake or Misunderstood
Honestly, the stakes were huge. ReDigi wasn't some pirate site. It was a platform trying to apply the "First Sale Doctrine"—the legal rule that lets you sell a physical book or CD you bought—to the digital age. But the courts didn't see it that way. They saw it as making illegal copies.
The Fight Over Digital Ownership
Think about your Kindle library or your iTunes account. You paid for those, right? You’d think you own them. But 1:16-cv-07673-RA proved that in the eyes of the law, you’re often just a licensee, not an owner.
ReDigi built this clever system to make sure that when you sold a song, the file was deleted from your computer as it was moved to the buyer. They called it a "migration." They even had a "Media Manager" to verify that the files were legally purchased. Capitol Records, representing the big music labels, sued. They argued that because the digital file was technically "reproduced" on a new server during the transfer, it violated their exclusive right to reproduction under the Copyright Act.
The court agreed with the labels.
Judge Richard J. Sullivan, and later the appellate court, focused on the physics of it. Even if the original file is deleted, a new copy is created on the recipient's hard drive. In the physical world, if I give you a book, there’s still only one book. In the digital world of 1:16-cv-07673-RA, the act of "giving" inherently creates a second version, even if only for a millisecond.
That distinction effectively ended the dream of a digital flea market.
Why Case 1:16-cv-07673-RA Changed Everything
This wasn't just a win for Capitol Records; it was a total lockdown for digital platforms. It meant that companies like Steam, Amazon, and Apple didn't have to worry about users reselling their digital purchases at a lower price.
It’s why your digital "purchases" feel so much like rentals.
The legal battle dragged on for years. By the time we hit the late 2010s, the case reached the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. The judges there were sympathetic to the idea that the law was outdated, but they said their hands were tied by the text of the Copyright Act. They basically told ReDigi: "Your tech is cool, but the law says 'reproduction' is illegal, and you're reproducing."
The "First Sale" Problem
The First Sale Doctrine is found in 17 U.S.C. § 109. It’s what allows libraries to exist. It’s what lets you have a garage sale. But the court in 1:16-cv-07673-RA ruled that this doctrine only applies to the particular physical object the work is stored on. If you sell the actual hard drive the music is on? Legal. If you send the data over the internet to someone else’s hard drive? Illegal.
It sounds like a technicality. It is a technicality. But it’s a technicality that governs a multi-billion dollar industry.
The Aftermath and the Rise of NFTs
Years after the height of 1:16-cv-07673-RA, the world tried to solve this with Blockchain. NFTs (Non-Fungible Tokens) were supposed to be the "fix" for digital ownership. The idea was that you could finally "own" a digital asset and sell it to someone else without the "reproduction" hurdle because the ledger tracks the single unit of ownership.
But even with NFTs, the ghost of the ReDigi case lingers. Most NFT contracts still only grant a license. They don't give you the underlying copyright. The legal framework established in this case remains the dominant hurdle for anyone trying to disrupt digital commerce.
The reality is that major corporations prefer the subscription model. They don't want you to own things. They want you to pay $15 a month forever. By winning 1:16-cv-07673-RA, the record industry ensured that the secondary market would never eat into their primary sales.
What You Can Actually Do Now
If you’re frustrated that your digital library is a dead end, you aren't alone. But since the courts haven't budged on 1:16-cv-07673-RA, you have to be smart about how you consume media.
First, stop thinking of "Buy Now" buttons as actual ownership. They aren't. If the platform goes under, or they lose the rights to a specific song or movie, it can vanish from your library. This has happened on Sony’s PlayStation Store and with Discovery content.
Second, if you really care about ownership, buy physical. You can rip a CD to your computer for personal use (that’s generally considered fair use), and you can still sell that physical CD later. You can't do that with a file from the iTunes Store.
🔗 Read more: What is the most expensive app: Why people actually pay $1,000 for software
Third, support platforms that offer DRM-free downloads, like Bandcamp or GOG for games. While 1:16-cv-07673-RA makes it hard to resell them, having the actual file on your own backup drive means no one can take it away from you.
The legal battle of 1:16-cv-07673-RA was a turning point. It was the moment the law decided that digital objects are fundamentally different from physical ones, and not in a way that favors the consumer. It’s a bit of a grim reality, but understanding the rules of the game is the only way to play it effectively.
Actionable Steps for Digital Consumers:
- Audit your "purchases": Check the Terms of Service on your favorite platforms. Look for the word "license" vs "own."
- Prioritize DRM-free: When possible, buy from storefronts that let you download a standalone installer or file.
- Backup everything: Use a 3-2-1 backup strategy (three copies, two different media, one offsite) for digital assets you actually care about.
- Advocate for Right to Repair and Digital Ownership: Support organizations like the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) that lobby to update copyright laws to reflect modern technology.
The ReDigi case might be closed in the courtroom, but the impact on your digital wallet is very much alive.