Imagine a person who has committed the unthinkable. A serial killer, convicted of multiple gruesome homicides, sitting in a cell while a pen hovers over a piece of paper in the Oval Office. It sounds like the plot of a political thriller that’s trying way too hard to be edgy. But the question is actually a massive point of debate in constitutional law: Can the president pardon a serial killer?
The short answer? Yes. But there is a massive, gaping "but" that usually keeps these people behind bars forever.
People often think the President of the United States is a kind of king who can wave a magic wand and make any crime vanish. That’s not how it works. Our system is split between federal and state power. If you rob a bank, that’s usually federal. If you kill your neighbor, that’s almost always state law. This distinction is everything when it comes to the pardon power.
Why the President Can (and Can't) Step In
Article II, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution gives the President the power to "grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment."
Note those four words: "Offences against the United States."
This is the legal wall. Most serial killers—think Ted Bundy, Jeffrey Dahmer, or more recent state-level cases—are prosecuted by state DAs in state courts. They broke state laws. The President has zero authority there. None. A President could scream until they’re blue in the face, but they can’t touch a conviction from the State of Ohio or California. Only a Governor can do that.
However, if a serial killer commits their crimes on federal property—like a National Park or a military base—or if they kill federal officials, it becomes a federal case. In that specific, narrow scenario, can the president pardon a serial killer? Legally, the power is "plenary." That’s a fancy lawyer word for absolute.
🔗 Read more: St. Joseph MO Weather Forecast: What Most People Get Wrong About Northwest Missouri Winters
The Absolute Nature of the Pardon Power
Let’s be real: it would be a political suicide mission.
If a President actually pardoned a mass murderer, the backlash would be tectonic. But the Supreme Court has historically been very protective of this power. In cases like Ex parte Garland (1866), the Court basically said the pardon power is "unlimited" and extends to every offense known to the law. It can be exercised at any time—after the crime is committed, before charges are filed, or after a conviction.
There are no real checks on it.
- Congress can't overrule it.
- The Supreme Court can't really "undo" it unless the pardon itself was somehow illegal (like a bribe, though even then it's murky).
- The public can't vote it away.
We saw a version of this "absolute power" when Gerald Ford pardoned Richard Nixon before he was even charged with a crime. It was a "full, free, and absolute pardon" for all offenses he might have committed. If a President wanted to give that same "get out of jail free" card to a federal serial killer, the law technically allows it.
Real Examples of Violent Crimes and Clemency
We haven't seen a President pardon a literal serial killer. That’s just too far outside the "mercy" norm. But we have seen pardons for people involved in significant violence.
Take the case of Chelsea Manning. While not a killer, she was convicted under the Espionage Act for a massive leak. President Obama commuted her 35-year sentence. Or look at the controversial pardons of military contractors or service members accused of war crimes in Iraq. These were people involved in multiple deaths.
💡 You might also like: Snow This Weekend Boston: Why the Forecast Is Making Meteorologists Nervous
The mechanism is the same. Whether it's a political ally or a random prisoner, the President doesn't have to explain why they are doing it. They just sign the paper.
The State-Level Safety Net
Honestly, the reason you don't see serial killers walking free because of a President is the "dual sovereignty" doctrine.
Most serial killers leave a trail across different jurisdictions. If a killer murders someone on a federal military base (Federal) and then murders someone in a nearby town (State), they face two different sets of charges. Even if the President pardons the federal crime, the state conviction stands.
The Supreme Court reaffirmed this in Gamble v. United States (2019). You can be prosecuted by both the state and the federal government for the same act without it being "double jeopardy."
So, if a President pardoned a serial killer for the federal murders, that killer would likely just be handed over to a state prison to serve out a different life sentence for the state-level murders. It's a legal backup system that prevents any one person from totally subverting justice.
What Most People Get Wrong About This Power
People often confuse a pardon with a commutation.
📖 Related: Removing the Department of Education: What Really Happened with the Plan to Shutter the Agency
A pardon is a total wipe. It’s as if the crime never happened in the eyes of the law (mostly). It restores the right to vote, the right to own a gun, and removes the conviction from the record. A commutation just shortens the sentence. The person is still a "convicted felon," they just get to go home early.
If a President were to "pardon" a serial killer, they would be saying: "You are no longer a criminal."
The legal community is still debating if there are any invisible boundaries. Some argue that a pardon that "subverts the rule of law" could be an impeachable offense. But impeachment is a political process, not a criminal one. It wouldn't necessarily "void" the pardon itself. Once the bell is rung, you can’t un-ring it.
Actionable Insights: How to Track Pardon Abuse
If you’re concerned about how this power is being used or want to see the history of clemency, there are a few things you can do to stay informed:
- Check the DOJ Office of the Pardon Attorney: They keep a public database of every formal petition and every granted pardon or commutation. It’s the only way to see the "official" numbers versus the political headlines.
- Monitor State vs. Federal Jurisdictions: When a high-profile violent crime happens, look at who is bringing the charges. If it's a "U.S. Attorney," that’s federal. If it’s a "District Attorney" or "State Attorney," that’s the state. Only the latter is safe from a presidential pen.
- Support Clemency Reform Groups: Organizations like the American Bar Association often propose reforms to require more transparency in the pardon process, such as mandatory waiting periods or public reports on why a specific pardon was granted.
The power to pardon is a "safety valve" in our justice system meant for mercy and correcting mistakes. While it technically allows a President to do something as wild as pardoning a serial killer, the layers of our legal system and the sheer political weight of such a move make it almost impossible in the real world.
To dig deeper into the actual cases, you can look up the "List of people pardoned or granted clemency by the President of the United States" on various legal archives to see the shift in how this power has been used from the 1700s to today.