You’ve probably been there. You ask Google Gemini a simple question about a historical date or a recipe, and it gives you an answer that sounds like it came from a Nobel laureate. Then you double-check. And—wait—that’s not right. At all.
So, can Gemini AI make mistakes? Honestly, the short answer is a loud, resounding yes.
Even though we’re well into 2026 and these models have gotten scary-smart, they aren't perfect. They don't "know" things the way you and I do. They're basically just really, really good at guessing the next word in a sentence based on patterns. Think of it like a super-powered version of the autocomplete on your phone. Most of the time it’s helpful, but sometimes it suggests "I love you" when you meant to type "I love yams."
Why Gemini Still Trips Up (The Science of "Hallucinations")
In the tech world, we call these errors "hallucinations." It’s a bit of a fancy term for when the AI just makes stuff up. Research from late 2025 and early 2026 shows that while models like Gemini 3 Pro have improved their factual accuracy significantly—scoring over 50% on the Omniscience Index—they still have a stubborn habit of being "overconfident."
Basically, if Gemini doesn't know the answer, it would often rather lie to you than say, "I have no clue."
🔗 Read more: How to Machine Groove into Gun Slide: What Most People Get Wrong About DIY Milling
The Satire Problem
AI is notoriously bad at catching sarcasm or satire. There was a famous incident in 2025 where Google’s AI Overviews cited an April Fool’s joke about "microscopic bees" powering computers as if it were a breakthrough in physics. It saw the text, recognized it was formatted like a news article, and just assumed it was true. It lacks that "gut feeling" humans have when something sounds too weird to be real.
Data Voids and Information Gaps
When you ask about something super niche—like a local law that just passed yesterday or a tiny startup that hasn't made the news yet—Gemini hits a "data void." Because there isn't enough high-quality info to pull from, the model starts stitching together related concepts. You might end up with a response that looks perfect but mixes your local mayor’s name with a policy from a city three states over.
The Stats Don't Lie: Error Rates in 2026
If you think you're imagining the mistakes, you aren't. Recent studies have actually put numbers to this:
- News Summaries: A major study by the BBC and EBU found that roughly 45% of AI-generated news summaries contained at least one significant error.
- Sourcing Issues: Gemini specifically struggled with "sourcing" in these tests, sometimes misattributing quotes or failing to link back to the right publisher.
- Medical and Legal Risks: In specialized fields, the stakes are higher. While general knowledge hallucination rates for Gemini-2.0-Flash dropped below 1%, specialized legal or medical queries still saw error rates between 4% and 6%.
It’s getting better, sure. But "better" isn't "perfect."
How to Spot a Gemini Mistake Before It Bits You
You don't need to be a data scientist to vet these answers. You just need to be a little skeptical. Honestly, the more confident the AI sounds, the more you should probably check its work.
Look for the "Double-Check" button. Google actually built a tool for this. Under many Gemini responses, there’s a small "G" icon or a "Double-check response" option. If you click it, Google Search will cross-reference the AI's claims. Green highlights mean the web agrees; orange highlights mean the AI might be "winging it."
Watch out for "The Time Warp."
AI models have a "knowledge cutoff," though Gemini uses Google Search to try and stay current. Even so, it often confuses past events with the present. If you're asking about stock prices or live sports, always verify with a dedicated live tracker.
Vague prompts lead to vague truths.
If your prompt is "Tell me about the history of cars," Gemini can handle that easily. If your prompt is "Tell me about the blue car I saw yesterday," it’s going to guess. And when AI guesses, it usually hallucinates.
Expert Tips for Using Gemini Safely
If you’re using Gemini for work, especially in 2026 where "Action Models" are doing more of our admin tasks, you need a strategy. You can't just copy-paste and pray.
- Use the "Draft-Critique-Revise" Method: Ask Gemini to write something. Then, in a new prompt, say: "Check your previous answer for factual errors and list anything that might be incorrect." You'd be surprised how often it catches its own mistakes when you force it to look closer.
- Give it a Role: Instead of just asking a question, tell it: "You are a factual researcher. Only provide information you can verify through multiple sources." This narrows the "creative" path the AI might take.
- The Human-in-the-loop Rule: Never let an AI-generated document go to a client, a doctor, or a legal entity without a human eye on it. Period.
Actionable Next Steps
To make the most of Gemini without getting tripped up by errors, start doing these three things today:
💡 You might also like: How to Create a Book in Word: What Most Authors Get Wrong About Formatting
- Verify every statistic: If Gemini gives you a number (e.g., "76% of people..."), search for that exact stat. If you can't find it in a reputable source within 30 seconds, discard it.
- Cross-reference with other models: If a fact seems shaky, throw the same prompt into Claude or ChatGPT. If they all give different answers, you’ve found a hallucination.
- Use Grounding: When asking about a specific document, upload the PDF or link the URL directly in the chat. This forces Gemini to look at the "source of truth" rather than its general training data.
Gemini is an incredible tool, maybe the most powerful one we have right now. But it’s still just a tool. It doesn't have a conscience, it doesn't have common sense, and it definitely still makes mistakes. Treat it like a very fast, very eager intern who occasionally makes things up to impress you.