You’ve probably heard it since grade school: the President of the United States gets two terms. Eight years and you’re out. It feels like one of those hard-coded rules of American life, right up there with death and taxes. But if you actually sit down and read the fine print of the 22nd Amendment, things get a little weird.
Technically, a person can serve as president for up to ten years.
Wait, what? Ten years isn't three terms. But it's also not eight years. The reality of whether can a president run for three terms is a "no" with a massive, fascinating asterisk attached to it. It’s not just a matter of "the law says so." It’s a story of one man breaking a 150-year-old tradition, a panicked Congress, and a very specific set of rules that most people—honestly, even some politicians—don't quite get right.
The Man Who Broke the Unwritten Rule
For the first century and a half of the U.S., there was no law stopping a president from running forever. George Washington just decided he’d had enough after two terms. He was tired, he wanted to go back to Mount Vernon, and he deeply feared that if he stayed until he died, the presidency would start looking like a monarchy.
So, he walked away.
That "walking away" became a sacred tradition. Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, and Andrew Jackson all followed it. It was the "two-term tradition," and it held firm until 1940. That's when Franklin D. Roosevelt (FDR) decided the world was too much of a mess—with the Great Depression and World War II looming—for him to leave. He ran for a third term. He won. Then he ran for a fourth. He won that, too.
FDR’s four-term streak absolutely spooked the political establishment. Republicans were furious, and even many Democrats felt like the "balance" was off. Shortly after FDR passed away in 1945, Congress moved fast to make sure no one could ever pull an FDR again.
📖 Related: The Ron and Casey DeSantis Scandal That Florida Can't Shake
The 22nd Amendment: The Math Behind the "10-Year Rule"
In 1951, the 22nd Amendment was ratified. This is the law that officially answers the question. It states: "No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice."
But here is the catch. The Amendment also accounts for Vice Presidents who have to take over mid-term.
If a Vice President (or anyone else in the line of succession) takes over because the sitting President dies, resigns, or is removed, they can still be elected to two terms of their own—but only if they served two years or less of the previous guy’s term.
Let’s look at the math.
If a President resigns at the two-year-and-one-day mark of their term, the VP steps in. Since there are less than two years left, that VP can then run for election in their own right twice.
- 2 years (finishing the old term)
- 4 years (first election)
- 4 years (second election)
- = 10 years total.
However, if they take over on day 364 of a term (meaning more than two years are left), they can only be elected once more. Basically, the law is designed to prevent anyone from being "King" for more than a decade.
The "Vice President Loophole" Theory
Recently, people have started asking a wilder question: Could a two-term president (like Obama, Bush, or Trump) run for Vice President and then just... wait for the President to resign?
Legal scholars like Michael Dorf at Cornell and Akhil Amar at Yale have debated this for years. It’s a bit of a constitutional cage match between the 12th Amendment and the 22nd Amendment.
- The 22nd Amendment says you can't be elected President more than twice.
- The 12th Amendment says "no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President."
If you’ve already been elected twice, are you "ineligible" to hold the office, or just "ineligible" to be elected to it? Most experts think the courts would shut this down in a heartbeat. They argue the intent of the 22nd Amendment was to keep people out of the Oval Office after two terms, period. But until someone actually tries it, it remains one of those "what if" scenarios that keeps law professors awake at night.
Why We Don't See Third Terms Globally
The U.S. is actually somewhat strict compared to the rest of the world, but also more relaxed than some.
- Mexico and South Korea: You get one term. That’s it. One and done.
- The UK and Germany: There are no term limits for the Head of Government (Prime Minister/Chancellor). Angela Merkel served for 16 years.
- Russia and China: These countries famously removed or bypassed their limits recently, allowing leaders to stay essentially for life.
The U.S. model is a "middle ground" designed to ensure stability while forcing fresh blood into the system every eight years.
👉 See also: Electoral College Interactive Map: What Most People Get Wrong
Can the 22nd Amendment be Repealed?
Yes, but it's incredibly hard. To change it, you'd need a two-thirds vote in both the House and the Senate, and then three-fourths of the states (38 out of 50) would have to agree. In today’s hyper-polarized world, getting 38 states to agree on what color the sky is would be a challenge, let alone a massive shift in executive power.
Various presidents have actually grumbled about the 22nd Amendment. Ronald Reagan famously thought it was a bad idea because it made the president a "lame duck" in their second term, meaning people stop listening to them because they know they’re leaving soon. Bill Clinton also suggested it should be changed to allow for non-consecutive terms.
What You Should Actually Take Away
Basically, unless you are a Vice President stepping in halfway through a term, you aren't getting more than eight years. The system is rigged—intentionally—to prevent anyone from becoming "indispensable."
If you're following the news and see someone claiming a president can just "ignore" the limit, they’re usually ignoring the massive legal wall that is the 22nd Amendment. It’s not just a guideline; it’s a foundational part of the Constitution that has been upheld for over 70 years.
Your Next Steps:
- Check the Calendar: If you're wondering about a specific current or former president, look at their "elected" count. If they have the number 2 next to their name, they are finished under current law.
- Read the 12th Amendment: If you want to dive deeper into the "VP loophole" debate, look at how the 12th Amendment defines eligibility.
- Look at State Laws: Interestingly, some states have their own term limits for governors that are even stricter or more relaxed than the federal ones. Compare your state’s rules to the 22nd Amendment to see how local power is checked.