It sounds like a plot point from a political thriller or a frantic West Wing script. You’ve got a popular former two-term president—let's say Barack Obama or George W. Bush—and their party is looking for a massive boost. They decide to put the former commander-in-chief on the bottom of the ticket. Can they do it? Basically, can a former president run as a vice president, or does the Constitution shut the door on that dream team?
The answer isn't a simple yes or no. Honestly, it’s one of the biggest "maybe" zones in American law. It’s a collision between two different parts of the Constitution that weren't written at the same time. On one side, you have the 12th Amendment. On the other, the 22nd Amendment. They sorta stare each other down like a legal Mexican standoff.
The 22nd Amendment: The "Two-Term" Rule
Most people know this one. It was passed after Franklin D. Roosevelt won four elections. The country decided that was probably too much power for one person. The text is pretty specific. It says: "No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice."
Notice that word: elected. It doesn’t say a person can’t be president. It says they can’t be elected to it. This distinction is where the lawyers start getting paid the big bucks. If you've already served two terms, you definitely cannot run for president again. That door is locked, bolted, and the key is at the bottom of the Potomac. But the amendment is weirdly silent on the vice presidency.
The 12th Amendment: The Eligibility Glitch
Here is where things get messy. The 12th Amendment, which was ratified way back in 1804, handles how we elect the president and VP. The very last sentence is the kicker. It says: "But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States."
If you read that quickly, you'd think, "Okay, if you can't be president, you can't be VP. Case closed." But legal scholars like Dan T. Coenen and Bruce Peabody argue it’s not that simple.
💡 You might also like: Robert Hanssen: What Most People Get Wrong About the FBI's Most Damaging Spy
The argument is that "constitutionally ineligible" refers only to the original requirements in Article II:
- You must be at least 35 years old.
- You must be a natural-born citizen.
- You must have lived in the U.S. for at least 14 years.
Since a former president like Bill Clinton or Barack Obama still meets those three requirements, some argue they are still "eligible" to hold the office—they just aren't allowed to be elected to it again because of the 22nd Amendment.
The "Backdoor" Presidency Scenario
Imagine a world where a former two-term president runs as VP and wins. Then, the sitting president resigns or, well, something worse happens. Does the former president take over?
If the 22nd Amendment only bans being elected to the presidency, then succeeding to the office from the vice presidency might be a perfectly legal loophole. You weren't elected president; you were elected vice president and then moved up.
It sounds sneaky. It is sneaky. But is it unconstitutional?
📖 Related: Why the Recent Snowfall Western New York State Emergency Was Different
Critics say this logic ignores the spirit of the law. They argue the 12th Amendment's "eligibility" clause should naturally include the new restrictions added by the 22nd Amendment. If you can't be elected president, they say, you are effectively "ineligible" for the office, period.
What About the Electoral College?
There's another weird hurdle most people forget about. It's in the 12th Amendment too. It says that electors cannot vote for a President and a Vice President who both live in the same state as the elector.
This happened in 2000. Dick Cheney had to quickly change his residency from Texas back to Wyoming so he could be on the ticket with George W. Bush, who was also from Texas. If a former president wanted to run as VP for someone from their own home state, one of them would have to pack their bags and move. Imagine the paperwork.
Has Anyone Ever Tried This?
Not really. We’ve seen former presidents return to public service in other ways. William Howard Taft became Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. Andrew Johnson actually went back and got elected to the Senate.
But no one has tested the VP loophole. It’s political dynamite. The moment a party tried it, the other side would file a lawsuit that would head straight to the Supreme Court. The justices would have to decide if "eligible to the office" means "eligible to be elected" or "eligible to serve."
👉 See also: Nate Silver Trump Approval Rating: Why the 2026 Numbers Look So Different
The Practical Reality
Politics is usually about optics. Even if it were 100% legal, it might be a tough sell. Would a former president really want to be the "second-in-command"? Would the actual presidential candidate want a "shadow president" sitting in the room during every meeting?
The ego involved is massive. Most former presidents are happy to give speeches, write memoirs, and build libraries. Stepping back into the grind of being a VP—attending funerals and breaking ties in the Senate—isn't usually high on the bucket list.
Key Takeaways for the Curious:
- The 22nd Amendment only bans being elected to the presidency more than twice.
- The 12th Amendment says VPs must be eligible to be President.
- The Loophole: Scholars disagree on whether "eligible" includes the term-limit ban.
- The Court: This has never been tested and would likely require a Supreme Court ruling to settle.
If you’re tracking this for a future election, keep an eye on constitutional law blogs or the National Constitution Center’s analysis. The consensus right now is that while the text might allow it, the political and legal risks are so high that no major party has been willing to roll the dice on it yet.
To dig deeper into this, you should look up the original debates from 1947 when the 22nd Amendment was being drafted. See if the lawmakers back then even considered the vice presidency. Most experts say they didn't, which is exactly why we have this mystery today.