California Long Term Capital Gains: Why Your Tax Bill Is Probably Higher Than You Think

California Long Term Capital Gains: Why Your Tax Bill Is Probably Higher Than You Think

You just sold your house in San Jose or maybe finally cashed out those Nvidia RSUs you’ve been sitting on for a decade. It feels great. Then you remember the tax man. Most people in the U.S. get a bit of a "thank you" from the IRS for holding assets for more than a year—a lower tax rate that tops out at 20%. But California? California doesn’t care about your patience.

Honestly, the biggest shock for newcomers or even long-time residents is realizing that California long term capital gains are taxed exactly the same as the money you earn from a grueling 60-hour work week. There is no "long-term" discount here. If you made $100,000 in salary or $100,000 selling Bitcoin you held for five years, Sacramento views that money through the exact same lens.

It’s brutal.

The Myth of the 15% Rate

We’ve all heard the federal rules. If you hold an asset for more than 366 days, you’re usually looking at a 15% or 20% federal capital gains rate. It’s a nice incentive to invest. But when you’re filing your 540 form with the Franchise Tax Board (FTB), that distinction vanishes.

California treats all capital gains as ordinary income.

This means your gains get piled right on top of your wages, interest, and business income. If that total pushes you into the state's highest brackets, you aren't paying a "low" investment rate. You’re paying up to 13.3%. When you combine the top federal rate of 20%, the 3.8% Net Investment Income Tax (NIIT), and California’s 13.3%, you could be handing over nearly 40% of your profit. That is a massive chunk of change that surprises even savvy investors.

The 13.3% figure isn't even the whole story for everyone. It includes the 1% Mental Health Services Act tax that kicks in once your taxable income crosses the $1 million mark. So, if you have a massive liquidity event—like a startup exit or selling a commercial building—you are essentially a partner with the state of California, and they are a very expensive partner.

How the Brackets Actually Hit Your Wallet

California has a progressive tax system. It’s not a flat tax. Some people think, "Oh, I’m in California, I’m paying 13%." Not necessarily. The rates start low, around 1%, and climb up through 2%, 4%, 6%, 8%, 9.3%, 10.3%, 11.3%, and finally that top tier.

Most middle-class families in the state find themselves in the 9.3% bracket.

🔗 Read more: The Stock Market Since Trump: What Most People Get Wrong

Think about that. If you're a married couple making $150,000 together and you sell some stock for a $50,000 gain, you aren't just paying the feds. You're giving the FTB nearly $4,600. It adds up. Fast.

The Residency Trap

I’ve seen people try to get clever. They think they can sell their assets while "vacationing" in Nevada or Florida to avoid the California long term capital gains hit. The FTB is legendary for its tenacity in residency audits. If you still have a house here, a driver's license here, or even a local gym membership, they will argue you’re a resident.

They use something called the "closest connection test." They look at where your doctors are, where you vote, and where your primary bank accounts are located. You can't just flip a switch and stop being a California taxpayer because it’s a Tuesday and you’re at a beach house in Tahoe (the Nevada side).

Real World Example: The Tech Worker's Dilemma

Let’s look at a hypothetical—but very common—scenario. Sarah works for a SaaS company in San Francisco. She’s been there since the early days. Her base salary is $180,000. This year, her company went public, and she sold a block of shares for a $500,000 gain.

She held the shares for three years, so she qualifies for federal long-term rates.

  1. Federal Tax: She pays 20% on most of that gain plus the NIIT.
  2. California Tax: The $500,000 is added to her $180,000 salary. Her total income is now $680,000.
  3. The Result: A huge portion of that $500,000 gain is taxed at 10.3% and 11.3% by the state.

Sarah might have been expecting a 15% total tax bill because she read a general finance blog. Instead, her effective rate is closer to 33% when you combine everything. She’s looking at a state tax bill alone of roughly $60,000 just on the stock sale.

Is There Any Way Out?

You aren't totally defenseless, but you have to be proactive. You can't fix this on April 14th.

Tax-Loss Harvesting
This is the most common move. If you have "dogs" in your portfolio—stocks that are down—you sell them to offset the gains. California allows you to use capital losses to offset capital gains, just like the feds do. If your losses exceed your gains, you can only deduct $3,000 against your ordinary income per year. The rest carries forward to future years. It’s a slow burn, but it works.

💡 You might also like: Target Town Hall Live: What Really Happens Behind the Scenes

Qualified Small Business Stock (QSBS)
Here is a "gotcha" that breaks people's hearts. Federally, Section 1202 allows you to exclude up to 100% of gains from certain small business stocks held for five years. It’s an incredible wealth-building tool.

California does not recognize the federal QSBS exclusion.

Let me say that again. Even if you pay $0 in federal tax on your startup exit, you will likely owe the full freight to California. This has been a point of massive contention in the Silicon Valley ecosystem for years, but the law hasn't budged.

Installment Sales
If you’re selling a business or real estate, you don't have to take all the money at once. By spreading the payments over several years, you might keep your total annual income in lower brackets. Instead of hitting the 13.3% cliff in year one, you might stay in the 9.3% range for five years.

It requires a lot of trust in the buyer, though. If they stop paying in year three, you've got a different kind of problem.

The Primary Residence Exclusion: A Small Mercy

There is one area where California plays nice: your home.

California generally follows federal law (Internal Revenue Code Section 121) regarding the sale of a primary residence. If you’ve lived in your house for at least two of the last five years, you can exclude up to $250,000 (single) or $500,000 (married filing jointly) of the gain from your income.

In a state where a "starter home" in Palo Alto costs $3 million, that $500,000 exclusion gets eaten up pretty fast. If you bought your house for $500,000 twenty years ago and sell it for $2.5 million today, you’re still looking at a $1.5 million taxable gain.

📖 Related: Les Wexner Net Worth: What the Billions Really Look Like in 2026

And yes, California will tax that $1.5 million as ordinary income.

Charities and Opportunity Zones

If you’re feeling philanthropic, a Donor-Advised Fund (DAF) can be a lifesaver. By donating appreciated stock directly to a DAF, you avoid the capital gains tax entirely and get a deduction on your income tax. It's a double win, provided you were planning on giving to charity anyway.

Then there are Opportunity Zones. These were created by the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. While they offer massive federal deferrals and exclusions for investing in distressed communities, California is one of the few states that does not conform to these rules. If you invest in an Opportunity Zone, you might defer your federal taxes, but you’ll be cutting a check to the FTB right away.

Why Does California Do This?

It comes down to volatility.

California’s budget is incredibly dependent on the top 1% of earners. When the stock market is booming and IPOs are popping, the state treasury overflows with cash. When the market crashes, the state budget goes into a tailspin. By taxing capital gains as ordinary income, the state maximizes its take during the "up" years.

It's a "boom and bust" cycle that defines California's fiscal policy. While other states like Texas or Florida use zero income tax to lure investors, California bets on its weather, industry, and culture to keep people paying the premium.

Strategic Moves for the Current Year

If you are looking at a major gain this year, you need to huddle with a CPA who actually understands California's specific quirks. Don't rely on software alone; it often misses the nuance of state-specific adjustments.

  • Check your basis: Make sure you are accounting for every cent of investment into a property or business. Improvements to real estate can significantly lower your taxable gain.
  • Timing matters: If you know your income will be lower next year (maybe you're retiring), waiting until January 1st to sell that asset could save you thousands in percentage points.
  • Charitable Remainder Trusts (CRTs): For very large gains, a CRT can allow you to sell an asset without paying immediate tax, providing you with an income stream for life and a future donation to charity.

California is a beautiful place to live and a fantastic place to build a business, but the "success tax" is real. Understanding that California long term capital gains are just "regular income" in the eyes of the law is the first step toward not getting blindsided when April rolls around.

Actionable Steps for Tax Season

  1. Calculate your "Real" Bracket: Don't just look at the federal 15%. Add your projected state bracket (likely 9.3% or higher) to your federal obligations to see your true net profit.
  2. Review Historical Losses: Go through your past three years of tax returns. Many people have "carryover losses" they forgot about that can be used to wipe out current gains.
  3. Document Everything: If you're selling a home, dig up those receipts for the kitchen remodel from 2012. Every dollar added to your "cost basis" is a dollar California can't tax.
  4. Fund Your Retirement Accounts: While it won't change the capital gains rate itself, contributing to a 401(k) or traditional IRA lowers your overall taxable income, which might keep you in a lower state tax bracket overall.

Tax planning in California isn't about finding a "secret" loophole. There aren't many left. It's about math, timing, and making sure you don't give the state a penny more than the law actually requires.