It started with a few screenshots on TikTok. Then, the internet exploded. If you’ve been anywhere near the commentary side of YouTube or TikTok lately, you know the name. Brooke Schofield, the co-host of the massive Cancelled podcast alongside Tana Mongeau, went from being the internet's "relatable best friend" to the center of a PR nightmare almost overnight.
People keep asking: was brooke schofield cancelled for real, or was it just another blip in the influencer news cycle? Honestly, it depends on who you ask. For some, it was a long-overdue reckoning. For others, it was the beginning of the end for one of the most popular podcasts in the world.
The Tweets That Changed Everything
We have to talk about the 2024 "exposure" that started the fire. It wasn't just one bad joke. It was a whole archive. Dozens of tweets from 2012 to 2016 resurfaced, and they weren't pretty. We’re talking about Brooke using homophobic slurs, making fatphobic comments, and, most controversially, defending George Zimmerman after the killing of Trayvon Martin.
On July 14, 2013, Brooke tweeted that if Zimmerman had shot a white guy, it "wouldn't even be a story." She called it "self-defense" rather than a crime of racism.
Reading those words in 2024 felt like a gut punch to her fanbase. Brooke had built a brand on being the "sane" one next to Tana’s chaos. Seeing her younger self mirror the exact opposite of that "progressive girlie" image was a massive shock to the system. She was 17 to 20 years old when most of these were posted. Does that excuse it? Most fans said no.
Tana Mongeau’s Solo Episode and the Fallout
The drama reached a boiling point when Episode 94 of Cancelled dropped. Tana was alone on the couch. That visual said everything.
🔗 Read more: Evil Kermit: Why We Still Can’t Stop Listening to our Inner Saboteur
Tana didn't hold back. She called the tweets "fucked up" and "horrific." She made it clear that as a white woman, she had no right to forgive Brooke on behalf of the Black community. It was a weird moment for long-time viewers. Tana herself has a history of racial controversies, so seeing her take the moral high ground felt... complicated.
But the business move was clear. Brooke was out. At least for a while.
The podcast took a hiatus. Sponsors started looking at the exit signs. Brooke uploaded a tearful apology on TikTok, blaming her "right-wing conservative" upbringing and her grandparents’ influence. She claimed she didn't know better because she was raised in a Fox News bubble.
"I thought I was anti-racist... I just didn't realize I was part of the problem."
That quote from her August 4 apology really divided people. Some saw it as a genuine "deconstruction" of her past. Others saw it as a classic influencer "blame the parents" tactic.
💡 You might also like: Emily Piggford Movies and TV Shows: Why You Recognize That Face
Is the Podcast Actually Ending?
Fast forward to mid-2025. The dust supposedly settled, Brooke returned to the show, and they went back on tour. But something changed. The vibe was off.
In July 2025, Episode 126 titled "the truth about Cancelled ending" sent shockwaves through the fandom. Tana and Brooke sat down and basically admitted they were burnt out. Tana mentioned "creative differences" and a desire to reclaim her own channel. Brooke seemed genuinely shocked by some of Tana's comments about potentially deleting old episodes.
By September 2025, Episode 130 was officially titled "THE END OF THE CANCELLED PODCAST." They looked back on four years of chaos. They cried. They thanked the fans. But the subtext was loud: the brooke schofield cancelled era had fundamentally fractured the foundation of their partnership.
What Most People Get Wrong About the Cancellation
People think she was "cancelled" just for the tweets. That’s only half the story. The real "cancellation" happened because of the shift in her audience's trust.
When Brooke blew up for her 16-part series about her ex Clinton Kane, she became the "IT" girl. She was the hero of the story. When the tweets came out, that hero narrative died. You can’t be the "relatable queen" while there's evidence of you defending a man who killed an unarmed teenager.
📖 Related: Elaine Cassidy Movies and TV Shows: Why This Irish Icon Is Still Everywhere
Also, the engagement to her fiancé, Miles, added more fuel. Rumors about his own past started circulating, and Brooke found herself in a perpetual state of "defending" rather than "creating." It’s exhausting for a creator, and it’s even more exhausting for a fan to watch.
What Happens Next?
So, where does Brooke go from here? The podcast is over. The "Cancelled" brand is effectively retired.
If you’re a creator or just someone following this saga, there are a few real-world takeaways from the brooke schofield cancelled timeline:
- The Internet is Forever: Deleted tweets aren't actually gone. Someone, somewhere, has a screenshot. If you’re building a public platform, you have to address your past before someone else does it for you.
- Apologies Need Action: Brooke’s first apology failed because it was all about her feelings and her upbringing. Her second apology, where she explicitly addressed Black fans and donated to the Trayvon Martin Foundation, was much better received.
- Brands Are Fragile: Cancelled was a multi-million dollar business. It took one week of resurfaced posts to put the whole thing on ice.
- Friendship and Business Don't Always Mix: Tana and Brooke are friends, but when a brand is built on "being real," a scandal makes the "realness" feel performative.
The end of the podcast marks the start of a new chapter for both. Tana is likely moving toward more solo content or collaborations with people like Trisha Paytas. Brooke? She’s likely focusing on her personal life and perhaps a pivot into a more "lifestyle" niche away from the shadow of Tana’s brand.
To stay informed on the actual facts of this situation, it is best to watch the final episodes of the podcast directly rather than relying solely on TikTok clips, which often strip away the nuance of their 80-minute conversations. Monitoring the Trayvon Martin Foundation's public reports on donor partnerships can also provide insight into whether the promised financial reparations from the podcast proceeds were fulfilled.