If you’ve ever sat through the two-and-a-half-hour emotional endurance test that is the Breaking the Waves film, you know that "watching" isn't really the right word for it. It’s more like being submerged. You’re drowning in the grey, misty atmosphere of the Scottish Highlands, feeling every jagged rock and cold gust of wind. It’s been decades since Lars von Trier dropped this bomb on the 1996 Cannes Film Festival, and honestly, the cinema world still hasn't quite recovered from the impact.
It’s a brutal movie.
There’s no getting around that. But why does it still feel so visceral in 2026? Most films from the mid-nineties feel like time capsules—relics of a specific aesthetic or a defunct way of thinking. Yet, the story of Bess McNeill and her agonizing, self-sacrificial love for Jan Nyman feels as raw today as it did when Emily Watson first looked directly into the camera lens and broke the fourth wall—and our hearts.
The Dogme 95 DNA and the Chaos of the Camera
To understand why the Breaking the Waves film looks so jittery and "real," you have to look at von Trier’s headspace at the time. He was just starting to mess around with the Dogme 95 manifesto. Now, technically, this movie doesn't follow all those strict "vows of chastity"—it uses chapter headings with painted landscapes and pop music, which is a big no-no for pure Dogme. But the spirit is there.
Robby Müller, the legendary cinematographer who worked with Wenders and Jarmusch, shot this on 35mm. But here’s the kicker: they transferred it to video and then back to film to get that grainy, almost "ugly" look. It’s handheld. It’s shaky. It feels like you’re a ghost standing in the room, voyeuristically watching a private breakdown.
It’s messy. Life is messy. Von Trier wanted to strip away the glossy artifice of Hollywood. He succeeded so well that some people actually felt physically ill in the theater. The lack of a traditional score during the scenes makes the silence heavy. When the music does kick in—think David Bowie’s "Life on Mars" or T. Rex—it feels like a gasp of air after being underwater.
💡 You might also like: Ashley My 600 Pound Life Now: What Really Happened to the Show’s Most Memorable Ashleys
Emily Watson and the Performance That Shouldn't Have Worked
Let’s be real: Bess is a difficult character. On paper, she’s "simple-minded" or perhaps neurodivergent, living in a suffocatingly religious community in the 1970s. She marries Jan, an oil rig worker played by Stellan Skarsgård. He gets paralyzed in an accident. Then things get weird. He asks her to have sex with other men and tell him about it. He thinks it’ll keep him alive. She believes him because she thinks she has a direct line to God.
Most actresses would have played this with a sort of "saintly" glow or a Hollywood version of mental illness. Emily Watson didn't do that. She was a total unknown at the time, and she gave a performance that felt like an open wound.
Why the "Bess" Archetype is Controversial
- The Martyrdom: Some critics, especially feminist scholars in the late 90s, hated this movie. They saw it as a "misogynistic fantasy" of a woman being destroyed for a man’s benefit.
- The Agency Issue: Does Bess have a choice? Or is she a victim of her own brain and Jan’s manipulative trauma?
- The Spiritual Angle: Is she crazy, or is she actually a saint? The film refuses to give you an easy answer until that final, impossible shot of the bells.
Von Trier has this reputation for being a provocateur, but in the Breaking the Waves film, he seems genuinely obsessed with the idea of "The Good Woman." It’s the first in his "Golden Heart Trilogy" (followed by The Idiots and Dancer in the Dark). He wanted to see how much a pure soul could take before the world crushed it. It turns out, the answer is "a lot."
That Ending: Miracle or Delusion?
We have to talk about the bells.
If you haven't seen it, stop reading. Go watch it. Come back in three hours when you’ve stopped crying.
📖 Related: Album Hopes and Fears: Why We Obsess Over Music That Doesn't Exist Yet
The ending of the Breaking the Waves film is one of the most debated sequences in modern cinema. Bess dies. She’s buried at sea because the church elders think she’s a sinner. Then, Jan—miraculously walking again—hears bells ringing in the sky. Not church bells. Celestial bells.
Is it a literal miracle?
Von Trier, an atheist who converted to Catholicism and then basically fell out with it, creates a "divine" ending in a world that feels completely godless. It’s a middle finger to the rigid, cruel religion of the village. It suggests that Bess was right all along. Love, even when it looks like madness or degradation, has a power that transcends the physical world.
The Technical Brilliance of the Chapter Breaks
One thing people forget is how beautiful the chapter breaks are. They were created by artist Per Kirkeby. These are static, wide-angle shots of the Scottish landscape, digitally manipulated to look like paintings.
They serve a purpose. They give you a break.
👉 See also: The Name of This Band Is Talking Heads: Why This Live Album Still Beats the Studio Records
The main movie is so claustrophobic and intense that these ten-second intervals of Procol Harum or Elton John playing over a misty valley are the only reason you don't have a panic attack. It’s a brilliant pacing tool. It reminds you that while Bess is suffering, the world is still vast and indifferent.
The Lasting Legacy of the Breaking the Waves Film
You can see the ripples of this movie in everything from Manchester by the Sea to the works of the Safdie Brothers. It proved that you could make a "spiritual" film without it being corny or "faith-based" in the traditional sense. It’s a secular film about the possibility of the sacred.
It also changed how we view Stellan Skarsgård. Before this, he was a Swedish star, but this put him on the global map as someone who could handle immense vulnerability. His chemistry with Watson is the only thing that makes the plot believable. If you didn't believe they loved each other, the rest of the movie would just be a series of cruel stunts.
How to Approach a Rewatch
If you’re diving back into the Breaking the Waves film, or seeing it for the first time, don't look at it as a standard narrative. Look at it as a fable.
- Ignore the logic of the village. The Scottish elders are intentionally two-dimensional. They represent the "Law," while Bess represents "Grace."
- Watch the eyes. Emily Watson does more with her pupils than most actors do with their whole bodies.
- Prepare for the sound design. The wind is a character. The sound of the oil rig is a character.
- Research the "Golden Heart" story. Von Trier was inspired by a children’s book he read as a kid about a girl who gives everything away until she has nothing left. It explains the "why" behind the cruelty.
The Breaking the Waves film isn't an easy watch, and it shouldn't be. It’s a movie that demands you have an opinion. You might leave it feeling angry at von Trier, or you might leave it feeling like you’ve had a religious experience. Either way, you won't forget it.
To truly appreciate the film's impact, track down the Criterion Collection version. The 4K restoration preserves that specific, gritty texture that Robby Müller intended, ensuring the visual "noise" doesn't get lost in digital compression. After finishing the film, read the original Dogme 95 manifesto to see exactly where von Trier was trying to break the rules he helped create. Understanding the technical rebellion makes the emotional rebellion of the characters hit even harder.