In the NBA, narratives have a way of sticking like gum on a sneaker. You’d think that after two seasons of Brandon Miller proving he's the real deal for the Charlotte Hornets, we’d be talking strictly about his high-flying slashes or that smooth 84 rating he just pulled in NBA 2K26. But nope. Mention "Brandon Miller Malika Andrews" in any hoops forum, and you’re instantly transported back to that tense June night in 2023.
It was a vibe shift heard 'round the world.
One minute, Miller is hugging his family, rocking a suit, and realizing his dream as the number two overall pick. The next, Malika Andrews is on the ESPN desk, pivoting from his wingspan to his involvement in a fatal shooting during his time at Alabama. Some called it journalism. Others called it a hit job. Honestly, the fallout from that one segment is still shaping how fans view sports media today.
The Interview That Launched a Thousand Tweets
What actually happened? People remember it as a "gotcha" moment, but the reality is a bit more nuanced—and a lot more awkward. Andrews didn’t just bring it up; she went deep into the legal cloud that had followed Miller throughout his college career. To be clear, Miller was never charged with a crime. Police testified that he transported a gun to the scene of a shooting that killed 23-year-old Jamea Jonae Harris, but his attorneys maintained he had no idea what was about to go down.
When Andrews hit the airwaves on draft night, she stayed on that topic. She asked about the "baggage" and the "investigation."
📖 Related: Bethany Hamilton and the Shark: What Really Happened That Morning
Fans lost it.
The backlash wasn't just about the facts; it was about the timing. You’ve got a 20-year-old kid at the pinnacle of his life, and the broadcast lead is reading from a police blotter. Critics argued that the Hornets had clearly done their homework—they wouldn't have staked a multi-million dollar franchise future on him otherwise. So, why rehash it then?
Why the Malika Andrews Criticism Stuck
This wasn't an isolated incident for Andrews. That's why the Brandon Miller situation blew up the way it did. Hoops fans have a long memory. They pointed to how she handled the Ime Udoka scandal or her reporting on Adreian Payne.
There’s this persistent narrative online—one that Andrews has explicitly called "unkind" and "untrue"—that she treats Black athletes differently than their white counterparts. When Josh Giddey faced allegations involving a minor, many users on X (formerly Twitter) kept a timer running to see how long it would take for her to mention it on NBA Today. The perceived delay compared to the instant interrogation of Miller fueled a fire that still hasn't quite gone out.
👉 See also: Simona Halep and the Reality of Tennis Player Breast Reduction
Brandon Miller’s Response: Silence is Golden
How did Miller handle it? Like a pro, mostly. He didn't fire back with a spicy tweet or a cryptic Instagram story. He went to Charlotte and started hooping.
Fast forward to 2026, and he's averaging nearly 20 points a game. He's a centerpiece. He’s the guy who’s supposed to save basketball in the Queen City. By just being good—consistently, quietly good—he’s forced the conversation to shift back to the hardwood.
But the media tension is still there. Every time Miller sits down for an ESPN interview, the comments section is a war zone. People look for the slightest hint of frostiness between him and Andrews. It’s become a case study in "Social Media vs. Professional Reality."
The Evolving Media Landscape in 2026
It's 2026 now, and Malika Andrews is still a powerhouse at ESPN. She just signed a massive extension and is even branching out into hosting tennis at the Australian Open. She’s versatile. She’s polished. But she’s also a lightning rod.
✨ Don't miss: NFL Pick 'em Predictions: Why You're Probably Overthinking the Divisional Round
The "Brandon Miller incident" taught us a few things:
- The "Draft Night" Rule: Fans expect draft night to be a celebration, not a courtroom. When those two worlds collide, the messenger usually gets shot.
- Context Matters: In the eyes of the public, the legal outcome (no charges) should have dictated the volume of the coverage.
- The Power of the Clip: That 60-second clip of her discussing his past lives forever on YouTube, often stripped of the context that ESPN producers likely mandated the talking points.
Honestly, it’s kinda fascinating. We live in an era where you can be the best host in the business, but one specific interview can define your reputation for years.
Moving Forward
If you're looking for a "reconciliation" moment, don't hold your breath. This isn't a movie. They are two professionals in the same orbit. Miller is busy trying to drag the Hornets into a deep playoff run, and Andrews is busy leading the coverage of a league that never sleeps.
The real lesson here? For athletes, your past is never truly "past" as long as there's a microphone nearby. And for journalists, the line between "reporting the news" and "ruining the moment" is paper-thin.
If you want to understand the current state of the NBA, look at Miller's stat sheet. He’s healthy, he’s starting, and he’s thriving. His knee contusion earlier this month was a scare, but he’s back. The noise from 2023 is just that—noise.
Next Steps:
If you're tracking Miller's progress this season, keep an eye on his shooting efficiency during back-to-back games, as the Hornets have been managing his minutes carefully. You should also watch the upcoming NBA Today segments; the way ESPN frames his All-Star candidacy will tell you everything you need to know about where their relationship stands today.