You’ve probably seen the TikToks or the late-night History Channel specials. Someone usually leans into the camera, looking all intense, and claims that "the church" or some shadowy group of guys in robes purged the "real" truth by deleting certain chapters from your Sunday morning pew Bible. It makes for a great conspiracy theory. It sounds like a Dan Brown novel. But the reality of books of the Bible taken out is actually a lot more about messy history, ancient printing costs, and heated theological debates than it is about a secret Illuminati-style bonfire.
Most people today open a standard Protestant Bible and see 66 books. If you’re Catholic, you’ve got 73. If you’re Ethiopian Orthodox, you’re looking at 81. So, who’s right? Did someone actually "take out" the good stuff, or were these books just left in the waiting room of history?
The Council of Nicea Myth
Let’s kill the biggest rumor first.
There is a massive misconception that the Council of Nicea in 325 AD was the place where a bunch of bishops voted on which books were in and which were out. Honestly? That didn't happen. Nicea was mostly about the nature of Jesus and the Arian controversy. They weren't sitting there with a giant "Approved" stamp for the New Testament. The process of deciding which books made the cut—what scholars call "canonization"—was a slow, organic, and sometimes annoying process that took centuries.
It wasn't a single meeting. It was a consensus.
Early Christians used various texts for decades. Some liked the Shepherd of Hermas. Others were big fans of the Epistle of Barnabas. Over time, the stuff that didn't feel authentic or didn't align with the oral traditions handed down from the apostles started to gather dust. It’s like how certain songs become "classics" while others are forgotten. Nobody banned the forgotten songs; people just stopped playing them.
The Apocrypha and the Great Protestant Split
When people talk about books of the Bible taken out, they are usually referring to the Deuterocanon, also known as the Apocrypha. These are books like Tobit, Judith, 1 and 2 Maccabees, Wisdom of Solomon, Sirach, and Baruch.
If you grew up Catholic or Orthodox, these are just... the Bible. No big deal.
✨ Don't miss: Weather Forecast Calumet MI: What Most People Get Wrong About Keweenaw Winters
But if you’re Protestant, they’re gone.
Why? Martin Luther.
During the Reformation in the 16th century, Luther was looking at the Hebrew Bible. He noticed that the Jewish community didn't include these specific books in their official Tanakh. Luther decided that if the Jewish people didn't consider them part of the Hebrew scriptures, then Christians shouldn't either. He didn't just delete them overnight, though. For a long time, Protestant Bibles—including the original 1611 King James Version—actually included the Apocrypha. They were just tucked into a separate section between the Old and New Testaments.
They weren't "taken out" for theological reasons alone. It was also about money.
In the 1800s, Bible societies realized they could print Bibles much cheaper if they just cut those middle pages. It saved on paper and shipping. Basically, the "lost" books of your Bible might have just been a victim of 19th-century cost-cutting measures.
What are these books actually about?
- 1 & 2 Maccabees: These are basically historical war stories. If you’ve ever wondered where the story of Hanukkah comes from, it’s here. It’s about the Jewish revolt against the Greek empire.
- Tobit: This one is wild. It’s got a giant fish, a demon named Asmodeus who kills husbands on their wedding night, and a blind guy getting his sight back with fish gall. It reads like a folk tale.
- Judith: A story about a widow who decapitates an invading general. It's metal.
- Sirach (Ecclesiasticus): This is basically more Proverbs. It’s full of "do this, don't do that" advice for daily life.
The Gnostic Gospels: The Stuff That Was Actually Banned
Now, if you want to talk about books that were actually rejected, we have to talk about the Gnostic Gospels. This is the stuff of The Da Vinci Code. These include the Gospel of Thomas, the Gospel of Mary, and the Gospel of Judas.
These weren't "taken out" because they were never really "in" to begin with.
🔗 Read more: January 14, 2026: Why This Wednesday Actually Matters More Than You Think
Most of these were written much later than the four standard Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John). While the standard Gospels were likely written between 60 and 90 AD, the Gnostic texts started popping up in the mid-2nd century or later.
They were weird. Really weird.
In the Infancy Gospel of Thomas, a young Jesus uses his powers to strike other kids dead for bumping into him or turns clay birds into real ones to show off. The mainstream early church leaders, like Irenaeus of Lyons, looked at these and said, "Yeah, no." They felt these texts didn't match the character of Jesus or the teachings of the people who actually knew him.
The discovery of the Nag Hammadi library in Egypt in 1945 gave us a huge look into these texts. They are fascinating from a historical perspective. They show a version of early Christianity that was obsessed with "secret knowledge" (gnosis) and viewed the physical world as evil. But for the early church, they were considered heretical fan fiction.
Does the missing stuff change anything?
Honestly, it depends on who you ask.
If you’re a scholar like Bart Ehrman, you might argue that the exclusion of these books narrowed the scope of what Christianity could have been. You might feel like we lost some of the diversity of the early movement.
On the other hand, if you talk to someone like Dr. Michael Kruger, an expert on the canon, he’d tell you that the books we have are the only ones that actually have the "DNA" of the original apostolic circle.
💡 You might also like: Black Red Wing Shoes: Why the Heritage Flex Still Wins in 2026
The "lost" books don't usually contain some secret map to a buried treasure or a code that breaks the universe. They mostly contain:
- Extra historical context for the 400 years between the Old and New Testaments.
- Wild, legendary stories about biblical figures.
- Philosophical musings that were a bit too "out there" for the early bishops.
How to find them today
You don't need a secret password to read these. You don't have to go to the Vatican archives.
If you want to read the books of the Bible taken out, just go buy a Catholic Bible or an NRSV with Apocrypha. Or, search for the "Early Christian Writings" website. It’s all public domain.
Steps to explore the "missing" texts:
- Start with 1 Maccabees. It’s the most historically grounded and provides a huge bridge between the two Testaments. It explains why the Jews in Jesus’ time were so desperate for a military Messiah to kick out the Romans.
- Check out the Wisdom of Solomon. It has some beautiful poetry that actually sounds very similar to things written by Paul in the New Testament.
- Read the Gospel of Thomas with a grain of salt. It’s a "sayings" gospel—no story, just quotes. Some of it sounds like Jesus; some of it sounds like a Greek philosopher who’s had too much wine.
- Compare translations. See how the Eastern Orthodox Bible differs from the Protestant one. The "extra" books in the Orthodox tradition, like 3 Maccabees or Psalm 151, offer even more flavor.
The history of the Bible is a story of curation. It’s about what people found valuable enough to copy by hand, over and over again, on expensive animal skins. The books that were "taken out" or left behind give us a window into what the early world was debating, what they feared, and what they ultimately decided to define as their truth.
To get the full picture, you should probably look at the books that were "taken out." Not because they’re a secret, but because they provide the messy, human context that makes the "official" books make a lot more sense. Reading the Apocrypha helps you understand the world Jesus actually walked in—a world of rebellion, martyrdom, and complex Jewish identity that the standard 66 books don't always fully illustrate on their own.
Next time you hear someone say the Bible was "edited" by a king or a pope, remember the printers in the 1800s trying to save a buck. Sometimes the "conspiracy" is just economics.
For a deeper look into the historical timeline, research the "Council of Carthage" (397 AD), which is where the New Testament list we use today was essentially finalized for the West. You can also look into the "Septuagint," the Greek translation of the Old Testament that the early Christians used—it's the reason why those "extra" books were in circulation in the first place. Understanding the Septuagint is the real key to knowing why some Bibles are thicker than others.