When you think back to 1997, your brain probably goes straight to a few specific things. Maybe it’s the tragic death of Princess Diana, the release of Titanic, or the rise of the Spice Girls. But in the middle of all that cultural noise, the political machinery in Washington was humming along under the leadership of Bill Clinton.
He was the guy.
Actually, it was a pretty massive year for him. He had just won his second term, beating Bob Dole in the 1996 election, and 1997 marked the start of his "sophomore" era in the White House. It wasn't just a placeholder year. It was the year of the Balanced Budget Act. It was the year Madeleine Albright became the first female Secretary of State.
If you're asking who was the president in 1997, you're really asking about the peak of the 90s boom. It was a weird, optimistic, yet deeply divided time. Clinton was at the center of it all, playing his saxophone and navigating a GOP-led Congress that basically wanted to dismantle his entire agenda.
The Year of the Great Compromise
Honestly, 1997 was arguably Clinton's most productive year because he actually learned how to play ball with Newt Gingrich. It’s hard to imagine now, in our era of total political gridlock, but the President and the Speaker of the House actually sat down and hammered out a deal.
They signed the Balanced Budget Act of 1997.
This was huge. It was the first time since 1969 that the federal government was on a path to a surplus. People forget how obsessed the 90s were with the deficit. Clinton, a Democrat, was doing things that traditional conservatives loved, like cutting capital gains taxes, while also protecting things like the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP).
It was "Triangulation" in action.
The idea was simple: move to the center, steal the Republicans' best ideas, and make them your own. It worked. The economy was absolutely screaming. Unemployment was dropping, and the tech bubble was just starting to inflate into something massive. You could feel the energy. If you were looking for a job in 1997, things felt pretty good.
Breaking the Glass Ceiling
We have to talk about Madeleine Albright. In early 1997, she was sworn in as Secretary of State. This wasn't just a standard political appointment; it was a shift in the American consciousness. She was tough, she was brilliant, and she was the first woman to ever hold that post.
She paved the way.
Clinton’s foreign policy in 1997 was focused heavily on NATO expansion. He wanted to bring Poland, Hungary, and the Czech Republic into the fold. It was a move to solidify the post-Cold War order, and Albright was the primary architect. While some critics argued this would unnecessarily provoke Russia—a debate that is obviously still raging today—at the time, it felt like the natural progression of a world that had "won" history.
The Scandal That Hadn't Quite Exploded
If you were living through 1997, you knew the name Paula Jones. You probably didn't know the name Monica Lewinsky yet. That’s the interesting thing about looking back at who was the president in 1997.
The storm was brewing, but the sky was still blue.
💡 You might also like: Weather Radar Central NY: Why Your App Is Always Five Minutes Behind the Storm
In May 1997, the Supreme Court ruled in Clinton v. Jones that a sitting president could be sued for actions unrelated to their official duties. This was a massive legal blow. It meant the sexual harassment lawsuit filed by Paula Jones could move forward. This legal green light is eventually what led to the deposition where Clinton was asked about his relationship with a certain White House intern.
But for most of '97? He was still the "Comeback Kid." His approval ratings were soaring. He was the guy who had survived the 1994 "Republican Revolution" and come out on top. He seemed untouchable.
The Culture of the Clinton Era
Life in 1997 felt different because the President felt like a part of the pop culture. He was on MTV. He was joked about on Saturday Night Live in a way that felt almost affectionate compared to the vitriol of today.
When we ask who was the president in 1997, we’re also asking about the vibe of the country. We were obsessed with the future. The "Bridge to the 21st Century" was Clinton's big campaign slogan, and in 1997, it felt like we were actually crossing it. NASA’s Mars Pathfinder landed on the Red Planet that July. We were looking up and looking forward.
A Global Perspective: Who Else Was Leading?
To understand Clinton’s 1997, you have to look at his "political soulmate" across the pond: Tony Blair.
In May 1997, Blair and the Labour Party won a landslide victory in the UK. This was the birth of "The Third Way." Both leaders were trying to find a middle ground between old-school socialism and cut-throat capitalism. They were young, charismatic, and incredibly media-savvy.
- Tony Blair: Prime Minister of the UK (started May 1997)
- Boris Yeltsin: President of Russia (dealing with health issues and a collapsing economy)
- Jiang Zemin: General Secretary of the Chinese Communist Party (witnessing the handover of Hong Kong)
- Helmut Kohl: Chancellor of Germany (the titan of European integration)
The world was changing fast. The British handover of Hong Kong to China in the summer of 1997 felt like the end of an era. It was the literal sunset of the British Empire. Clinton watched from the sidelines, maintaining a policy of "constructive engagement" with China, hoping that trade would eventually lead to democratic reform.
In hindsight, that might have been a bit optimistic.
The Economy of 1997: Goldilocks and the Tech Boom
Economists often call the late 90s the "Goldilocks Economy." Not too hot, not too cold. Just right.
In 1997, the GDP grew by about 4.5%. That is a staggering number by modern standards. Inflation was low. The stock market was doing things that made people feel like geniuses. The Dow Jones Industrial Average closed above 7,000 for the first time in February, then cleared 8,000 in July.
It was a frenzy.
Everyone was starting to talk about this thing called the "World Wide Web." Companies like Amazon (which went public in May 1997) were starting to change how we thought about commerce. Clinton and Vice President Al Gore were huge proponents of the "Information Superhighway." They signed the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997, which included the creation of the Roth IRA and the $500-per-child tax credit.
🔗 Read more: Pistol Pete and Sex Money Murda: The Reality Behind the Bronx Legends
These were tangible wins for the middle class.
Why 1997 Still Matters Today
It's easy to dismiss 1997 as just a year of peace and prosperity before the chaos of the 2000s, but the seeds of our current world were sown then.
The Kyoto Protocol was adopted in December 1997. It was the first major international agreement to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. While the U.S. Senate never ratified it, the framework for the modern climate change debate was established right then, under the Clinton administration.
We also saw the beginning of the end for Big Tobacco. The Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement started gaining steam in 1997. It was a year where the government started asserting itself against massive corporate interests in a way that felt new and aggressive.
Misconceptions About the 1997 Presidency
People often think the impeachment happened in 1997. It didn't. That was 1998 and 1999.
In 1997, Clinton was actually quite popular with Republicans in the "flyover states" because of his stance on welfare reform and crime. He wasn't the polarizing figure he would later become. He was a guy who knew how to talk to people. He was the "First Black President," as Toni Morrison famously (and controversially) wrote in The New Yorker, referring to his upbringing and his cultural connections.
But there were cracks.
The Asian Financial Crisis began in July 1997. It started in Thailand and spread like wildfire. While it didn't tank the U.S. economy immediately, it was a warning shot. It showed just how interconnected the world had become. Clinton’s Treasury Secretary, Robert Rubin, had to scramble to contain the damage. It was a reminder that even in a time of surplus, the "New Economy" was fragile.
Taking Action: How to Study the 1997 Era
If you're a history buff or just someone trying to understand how we got to where we are now, don't just look at the headlines.
- Read the 1997 State of the Union Address. It’s a masterclass in centrist politics. Clinton lays out a vision that sounds almost unrecognizable compared to today's partisan rhetoric.
- Look at the 1997 Budget Deal. Research the specifics of how a Democrat and a Republican House Speaker actually agreed on something. It’s a lost art.
- Watch C-SPAN Archives. No, seriously. Seeing the debates over NATO expansion or the chemical weapons treaty provides immense context for the geopolitical tensions we see in the 2020s.
The president in 1997 was a man of contradictions. He was a policy wonk who loved the spotlight. He was a fiscal conservative who protected social safety nets. He was a leader who was remarkably effective even as his personal life was beginning to derail his legacy.
🔗 Read more: Why the Age of New Pope Leo Matters More Than You Think
Understanding Bill Clinton in 1997 isn't just about a name on a list of presidents. It's about understanding the last moment of American unipolarity—that brief window where the Cold War was over, the War on Terror hadn't started, and the budget was actually balanced.
It was a hell of a year.
To get a deeper sense of the era, check out the digital archives at the William J. Clinton Presidential Library. They have digitized thousands of documents from 1997, including internal memos regarding the Balanced Budget Act and the Dayton Agreement. Exploring these primary sources is the best way to move past the nostalgic "90s vibes" and see the actual grit of the governance that defined the decade. Don't just rely on Wikipedia; look at the actual handwriting on the memos. That’s where the real history lives.