You’ve seen the yellow ballroom dress. You know the blue suit. For most of us, those specific Beauty and the Beast images are burned into our retinas thanks to the 1991 Disney classic. It’s the default setting. But if you actually dig into the visual history of this story, things get weird. Fast.
Honestly, the "Beast" hasn't always been a fuzzy, misunderstood buffalo-man. Depending on which century’s art you’re looking at, he’s been a pig, a monkey, a "great green worm," and even a giant walrus with tusks.
Visual storytelling in fairy tales is never just about being "pretty." It’s about what a specific culture found scary or attractive at that exact moment in time. When we look at the evolution of these images, we aren't just looking at art—we're looking at how the definition of a "monster" has shifted from a literal animal to a psychological state.
The Beast Was Once a Boar (and a Walrus?)
Long before pixels or celluloid, we had the "Golden Age" of illustration. This was the era of the late 19th and early 20th centuries when printers finally figured out how to do high-quality color. Artists like Walter Crane and Edmund Dulac were the celebrities of their day.
Crane’s 1874 version is a trip. His Beast isn't a tragic hero; he’s basically a dapper wild boar in a tailcoat. He wears a monocle. In one of the most famous plates, he and Beauty are just sitting on a sofa having tea. It’s sort of absurd. Crane was obsessed with the "Aesthetic Movement," so for him, the image was about flat colors and bold lines. He actually believed children preferred seeing things in profile without too much 3D depth.
Then you have Eleanor Vere Boyle in 1875. Her images are genuinely unsettling. She ditched the "lion" look and drew a Beast that looks like a cross between a walrus and a sabre-toothed tiger. He’s got these massive tusks and flippers. It’s not "cute-ugly." It’s "actually-terrifying-maritime-nightmare."
✨ Don't miss: Why October London Make Me Wanna Is the Soul Revival We Actually Needed
Why the look keeps changing
- 18th Century: The Beast was often just a "generic" animal, focusing on his lack of wit (the French word bête implies being both a beast and "dumb").
- Victorian Era: Images focused on "civility." Putting the Beast in a suit was a visual metaphor for the animalistic nature of man being tamed by society.
- Modern Day: We’ve moved toward the "Hot Beast" trope, where the monster is basically a bodybuilder with a skin condition.
The Surrealism of Jean Cocteau
If you want to understand where the magic in Beauty and the Beast images really comes from, you have to talk about Jean Cocteau’s 1946 film. This is the bridge between the old books and the Disney era.
Cocteau didn't have CGI. He used shadows and practical effects that still look better than most modern Marvel movies. He had human arms growing out of the walls holding candelabras. Mirrors acted as portals. The Beast (played by Jean Marais) wore a costume that took five hours to apply every single day.
The most striking images from this film are the ones that focus on the eyes. Marais’ Beast has these incredibly soulful, tortured eyes that contrast with his predatory fangs. It’s the first time we really see the internal struggle visually. Fun fact: the 1991 Disney animators basically stole the "magic mirror" and "living objects" concepts directly from Cocteau's visual playbook.
The Disney Influence: More Than Just a Yellow Dress
When Disney took a crack at this in the late 80s, they were actually failing. The first few versions were too dark, too literal, and didn't have the "spark." It wasn't until they leaned into the Rococo and Baroque art styles of 18th-century France that the imagery clicked.
The castle isn't just a building; it’s a character. The animators traveled to the Loire Valley in France to study real chateaus. If you look closely at the background paintings in the film, you’ll see "Easter eggs" of real masterpieces. There’s a version of Vermeer’s Girl with a Pearl Earring on the wall. The famous tapestry in the background of the dinner scene is a flipped version of Fragonard’s The Swing.
🔗 Read more: How to Watch The Wolf and the Lion Without Getting Lost in the Wild
The "Frankenstein" Beast
The Disney Beast's design is actually a mashup of several animals. It’s not just one thing.
- Mane of a lion
- Beard and head shape of a buffalo
- Tusks of a wild boar
- Brow of a gorilla
- Legs and tail of a wolf
- Body of a bear
The only thing that remained human? The eyes. Animators knew that if the eyes were animalistic, the audience would never fall in love with him.
What Most People Miss: The Hidden Symbolism
There is a specific image that appears in almost every version of the story: the Rose. In the original 1740 novella by Gabrielle-Suzanne Barbot de Villeneuve, the rose is the catalyst for the entire tragedy.
In visual art, the rose represents "Vanitas"—the idea that beauty is fleeting and death is inevitable. When you see images of the Beast cowering over a wilting rose, it’s a countdown clock. It represents his fading humanity.
Another big one is the Hand. Art historian Lauren Kilroy-Ewbank has pointed out how Disney’s animators were likely influenced by the sculptor Auguste Rodin. Look at the Beast’s hands during the transformation scene. They are huge, expressive, and tortured. They move from claws to human hands in a way that mimics Rodin’s famous "The Burghers of Calais" sculptures. It’s a level of artistic depth you don't expect from a "cartoon."
💡 You might also like: Is Lincoln Lawyer Coming Back? Mickey Haller's Next Move Explained
How to Source Real Beauty and the Beast Imagery
If you’re looking for authentic historical images rather than just screenshots from the movies, you need to know where to look. Most of the high-quality 19th-century illustrations are now in the public domain.
- The British Library: Holds incredible scans of the Walter Crane and H.J. Ford editions.
- The Met Museum: They recently had an exhibition called "Inspiring Walt Disney" that shows the direct links between 18th-century French porcelain and the film’s characters.
- SurLaLune Fairy Tales: This is basically the "Old Testament" of fairy tale sites. They have galleries of almost every major illustrator who ever touched the story.
Actionable Steps for Art Lovers
If you want to appreciate the visual history of this story beyond the surface level, start by comparing the Beast's face across different eras. Look at a 1910 Edmund Dulac illustration next to a still from the 2017 live-action movie. Notice how the older versions lean into the "alien" and "mysterious," while modern versions try to make the Beast look like a "handsome monster."
For those interested in the art history side, track down a copy of Beauty and the Beast: From Victorian Fairy Tales to Contemporary Art by Betsy Hearne. It breaks down how the "gaze" in these images has shifted from the Beast watching Beauty to the audience watching both of them.
Stop looking for the "definitive" version. There isn't one. The beauty of these images is that they are a mirror. They show us what we are currently afraid of—and what we think is worth saving. Keep exploring the archives of the 1800s; you’ll find that the "original" Beast was way more creative (and weirder) than anything Hollywood has come up with lately.