It is a strange, heavy thing to talk about the autopsy photos of Kennedy. Honestly, most people who look for them aren't just being macabre; they are looking for a key to a door that has been locked for over sixty years. Since that Friday in Dallas, those images have been the center of a storm that never really quieted down. They aren't just medical records. To many, they are the "smoking gun" or the "final proof," depending on which side of the grassy knoll you stand on.
Basically, the story of these photos is a mess of Navy photographers, Secret Service hand-offs, and a very protective Kennedy family. You’ve probably seen the grainy, black-and-white versions floating around the darker corners of the internet. But what is actually in the National Archives? And why did the doctors who took them end up disagreeing with what the pictures supposedly show?
The Chaos at Bethesda
The autopsy didn't happen in Dallas. It happened at the Bethesda Naval Hospital in Maryland, and it started late—around 8:00 PM on November 22, 1963. Imagine the room: crowded, tense, and crawling with high-ranking military brass who probably shouldn't have been there.
John Stringer was the main photographer. He was a Navy man, and he spent the night clicking away with a Speed Graphic camera. Beside him was Floyd Riebe, an assistant who was also taking shots. They took color transparencies, black-and-white negatives, and even some 4x5 inch film. But here is where it gets weird.
If you look at the official inventory later, things don't add up. Stringer later testified to the Assassination Records Review Board (ARRB) in the 1990s that some of the photos he remembered taking—specifically of the inside of the chest cavity—weren't in the official collection.
"I know I took more than that," is a sentiment that echoes through almost every interview with the medical staff present that night.
Why the Photos Contradict the Doctors
This is the part that fuels the fire. Dr. James Humes and Dr. "J" Thornton Boswell were the lead pathologists. They weren't forensic pathologists, by the way. They were general pathologists. That distinction matters because forensic guys are trained to track bullet paths in a way hospital doctors just aren't.
✨ Don't miss: Who Has Trump Pardoned So Far: What Really Happened with the 47th President's List
The biggest fight is over the back of the head.
In the official autopsy photos of Kennedy held by the government, the back of the President's head looks relatively intact, save for a small entry wound. But if you read the reports from the doctors at Parkland Hospital in Dallas—the ones who actually tried to save his life—they described a "large, gaping hole" in the back of the head.
This discrepancy is why people get so obsessed with these images. If the back of the head was blown out, the shot had to come from the front. If the photo shows the back of the head intact, the shot came from behind.
The Question of Alteration
Did someone "fix" the photos? It sounds like a movie plot, but serious researchers have spent decades on this.
- The Scalp Pull: Some theorists argue that the scalp was pulled over a larger wound to hide it for the camera.
- The "Missing" Brain: Kennedy’s brain was removed for further study, but it eventually went missing from the National Archives. Without the physical evidence, the photos are all we have, and they are notoriously hard to interpret.
- The Perspective Shift: In some shots, it's genuinely hard to tell which way is up. The lighting is harsh, and the angles are tight.
Where Are the Photos Now?
They aren't on a public gallery on a government website. Not exactly.
Most of the autopsy photos of Kennedy are kept in a climate-controlled vault at the National Archives in College Park, Maryland. Access is extremely restricted. For decades, you basically needed the permission of the Kennedy family to see them. Even now, while many documents have been declassified under various acts, the actual graphic medical photos are often withheld from general public viewing out of respect for the family's privacy.
🔗 Read more: Why the 2013 Moore Oklahoma Tornado Changed Everything We Knew About Survival
However, in March 2025, a massive wave of JFK records was released following a directive to finally clear out the "withheld" files. This included thousands of pages from the FBI and CIA. While these releases gave us more context about Lee Harvey Oswald and intelligence operations, they didn't magically resolve the conflicts in the medical evidence.
The images that are public are usually the ones leaked years ago or published in the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) report in the late 70s. Those versions are often third or fourth-generation copies. They’re blurry. They’re "kinda" clear but just fuzzy enough to let you see whatever you want to see.
What the Experts Say (and Don't Say)
The HSCA brought in a panel of forensic experts to look at the original negatives. Their verdict? The photos were authentic and showed no signs of being "doctored" in the traditional sense. They concluded that the wounds shown were consistent with two shots from behind.
But then you have someone like Dr. Cyril Wecht, a legendary forensic pathologist who was the lone dissenter. He’s spent a lifetime arguing that the autopsy photos of Kennedy and the X-rays simply don't align with the "Single Bullet Theory."
He points out that the X-rays show a "dusting" of lead fragments near the top of the skull, which he argues is more consistent with a different type of ammunition or a different angle than what the Warren Commission claimed.
The Human Side of the Record
We get so caught up in the "conspiracy" that we forget these are photos of a human being.
💡 You might also like: Ethics in the News: What Most People Get Wrong
The Secret Service took the film from Stringer almost immediately after the autopsy. It wasn't developed in a normal lab; it was processed under high security. For years, the Kennedy family, particularly Robert Kennedy, fought to keep these images out of the public eye. They didn't want their husband and brother's most vulnerable, broken moment turned into a tabloid sensation.
You can respect that privacy while also acknowledging that the secrecy created a vacuum. And in that vacuum, doubt grew.
Actionable Insights for Researchers
If you are trying to make sense of the autopsy photos of Kennedy yourself, you have to be careful about your sources. Most of what you see on social media has been cropped or "enhanced" with AI, which can actually create details that weren't in the original film.
- Check the ARRB Records: The Assassination Records Review Board's final report is the best place to read the actual testimonies of the photographers. They go into detail about the film types used and the "missing" frames.
- Compare with the X-Rays: The photos alone are misleading. You have to look at them alongside the skull X-rays (which are also public in copy form). The X-rays show the internal damage that the skin and hair might be hiding.
- Study the "Face Sheet": Look for "Commission Exhibit 397." This is the diagram Dr. Boswell drew during the autopsy. Interestingly, he marked the back wound much lower than where the final report placed it.
- Use the National Archives Catalog: Don't rely on "leak" sites. Go to the National Archives JFK Collection and search for the digitized medical descriptions. Even if the photos aren't all viewable, the descriptions of them are.
The truth is, the autopsy photos of Kennedy might never provide a "eureka" moment. They are a snapshot of a chaotic night where science, politics, and grief collided. They tell a story of a botched medical procedure as much as they tell a story of a murder.
If you want to understand the assassination, don't just look at the wounds. Look at the chain of custody. Look at who held the camera, who took the film, and who decided what we were allowed to see. That is where the real history is hidden.
Next Steps for Deep Research:
You can start by cross-referencing the Bethesda Autopsy Descriptive List with the Parkland Hospital Medical Notes. This will show you exactly where the "Dallas doctors" and the "Maryland doctors" disagreed on the physical size of the head wound. Following the paper trail of the "missing" 4x5 color transparencies in the ARRB testimony is also a great way to understand the gaps in the official record.