You’ve probably seen the numbers floating around. In some corners of the internet, people throw out figures like "62" or "70" when talking about the Australian Aboriginal average iq. It’s one of those statistics that gets weaponized in arguments without much context. But honestly, if you actually look at the history of how these numbers were gathered, the story is way more complicated—and a lot more interesting—than just a single digits-on-a-page score.
Measurement is tricky. When we talk about "intelligence," we usually mean how well someone can solve the specific types of puzzles found in Western IQ tests. But what happens when you take a test designed for a kid in a Sydney suburb and give it to someone whose entire world is built on different survival skills, languages, and social structures? You get a mess. That’s basically where we are today: trying to untangle real cognitive ability from the noise of cultural bias and social disadvantage.
The Problem with the Numbers
Early researchers like Stanley Porteus in the 1920s and later Richard Lynn have been cited for decades regarding low average scores. Lynn, specifically, is often the source of that "62" figure. However, many modern psychologists and sociologists point out that these studies often ignored the baseline reality of the people being tested. Many of the participants were dealing with extreme poverty, lack of formal Western schooling, and, in many cases, weren't even fluent in the language the test was written in.
Think about it this way. If I dropped you in the middle of the Western Desert and asked you to track a perentie lizard or navigate hundreds of miles using only songlines and star maps, your "survival IQ" would probably look pretty dismal to the locals.
The gap isn't just about what's in the brain; it’s about what’s in the environment. Studies have shown that when Aboriginal children are raised in the same educational and socioeconomic conditions as non-Indigenous children, those "average" gaps start to shrink or disappear. It's not a mystery. It’s nutrition, ear health (like the high rates of otitis media in remote communities that affect learning), and access to a classroom that speaks your language.
✨ Don't miss: Am I Gay Buzzfeed Quizzes and the Quest for Identity Online
Cognitive Strengths Nobody Talks About
While mainstream media obsesses over the "g factor" (general intelligence), researchers like Judith Kearins found something fascinating when they looked at specific skills. In her famous 1976 study, Kearins discovered that Aboriginal children from semi-traditional backgrounds actually outperformed white Australian children on visual-spatial memory tasks.
Specifically, when asked to memorize the placement of objects on a grid, the Aboriginal kids were significantly more accurate. They didn't just remember "where things were"; they remembered the tiny details of the objects themselves. They used a visual strategy, whereas the white children tried to use a verbal strategy (like "the rock is next to the stick").
- Visual-spatial memory: Significantly higher in many Indigenous groups.
- Pattern recognition: Often sharper due to cultural emphasis on tracking and land navigation.
- Memory for detail: High performance in non-verbal contexts.
This suggests that the human brain adapts to what it needs. If your culture values the ability to remember the exact curve of a sand dune to find water, your brain gets really good at that. A standard IQ test that asks you to define the word "analogy" or solve a Western logic puzzle isn't going to pick up on that specialized brilliance.
Health, Poverty, and the "Brain Gap"
We can't talk about the Australian Aboriginal average iq without talking about the "Stolen Generations" and the systemic issues that followed. Intergenerational trauma isn't just a buzzword; it has physiological effects. Chronic stress and high cortisol levels in mothers can affect fetal brain development.
🔗 Read more: Easy recipes dinner for two: Why you are probably overcomplicating date night
Then there's the physical stuff. Malnutrition and infectious diseases in early childhood—especially in the first 1,000 days—can literally change brain volume. A study by J. Klekamp and colleagues showed that while some brain regions were smaller in Aboriginal samples, these differences were largely attributed to childhood malnutrition and environmental factors rather than genetics.
Basically, if you don't give a plant enough water, it doesn't grow to its full height. That doesn't mean the seed was "bad"; it means the soil was dry.
Culture-Fair Testing: Is it Possible?
Psychologists have tried to create "culture-fair" tests, like the Raven’s Progressive Matrices, which use shapes and patterns instead of words. Even then, the results are skewed. Why? Because the very act of sitting in a quiet room, with a stopwatch, performing a useless task for a stranger, is a Western cultural construct.
In many Aboriginal cultures, "intelligence" is social. It’s about how you relate to others, your knowledge of kinship, and your ability to fulfill obligations to the land. Sitting alone and trying to beat a clock feels, to some, quite strange or even rude.
💡 You might also like: How is gum made? The sticky truth about what you are actually chewing
Moving Past the Static Average
Focusing on a single number is a trap. It ignores the incredible diversity within the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population—people living in high-rise apartments in Melbourne have vastly different experiences and "test-taking" skills than those in the Kimberley.
Recent data from the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) shows that as educational attainment rises, the "cognitive gap" measured by standard metrics continues to close. It’s a slow process because it requires fixing 200 years of social disparity, but the trend is clear.
Actionable Insights for a Better Perspective
If you’re looking to understand this topic beyond the headlines, here are some ways to approach the data:
- Check the Source: If a website quotes an IQ of 62, see if they are referencing Richard Lynn. If they are, recognize that his work is widely criticized for failing to account for the "Flynn Effect" (the rise in IQ scores over time as environments improve).
- Look at Specifics: Instead of "General IQ," look for studies on "Specific Cognitive Abilities." You'll find a much more nuanced picture of Indigenous strengths.
- Acknowledge the Environmental Load: Consider factors like "Otitis Media" (glue ear), which affects up to 90% of children in some remote communities and significantly hampers their ability to process verbal information in school.
- Value "Wayfinding" Intelligence: Recognize that different environments demand different cognitive toolkits. Western IQ tests are just one toolkit, not the only one.
The reality of the Australian Aboriginal average iq isn't found in a dusty 1970s textbook. It’s found in the lived experience of people who have survived in one of the harshest environments on Earth for 65,000 years. That’s a level of "intelligence" that no paper-and-pencil test can fully capture.
To get a clearer picture of cognitive health in Australia, researchers are now moving toward "culturally informed" assessments like the RUDAS (Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale), which minimize the impact of education and language. These tools provide a much fairer look at how the brain is actually functioning without penalizing someone for not being a "Western-style" student.